Summary of "TUS sürecim ve Önerilerim"
Main ideas & lessons (what the speaker conveys)
1) Choosing where to specialize matters more than just passing
The speaker argues that choosing the correct institution/track is more important than passing the exam itself. A wrong choice can waste the entire effort invested in preparing.
2) Their overall TUS retake story (timeline + results)
The speaker presents an updated account of their process—what worked and what they would warn others against.
- First attempt (2023)
- Accepted in ENT (Kulak).
- After resignation
- Resigned after a long time.
- Had about 4 months left until the March TUS exam.
- Second attempt (March 2025)
- Retook after ~2 years.
- Scored 74 (their retake performance).
- Chose Dermatology.
3) How they prepared in the short 4-month window (core methodology)
A) Building resources from scratch
Because they had previously given away their books:
- They bought books anew (mostly from scratch).
- They filled notes/understanding by reading the text first.
- They later supplemented pharmacology gaps by listening to lectures.
Resource strategy
- They initially tried TUSEM materials (for shorter books due to time constraints), but weren’t satisfied.
- They switched to TUSATA-based resources for both basic and clinical sciences.
- They preferred TUSATA because:
- They felt more “under control.”
- The books seemed more manageable/flowing (they didn’t find the “long summaries + question endings” structure in the editions they bought).
B) Starting with “morale-boost” subjects: Surgery → Internal Medicine
They began with General Surgery because they believed it would help morale after resignation.
- They performed very well quickly:
- After one read (excluding quirks from practice tests), they were getting “almost all” questions correct in general surgery.
Then they moved to Internal Medicine, but noticed:
- Internal medicine required far more time than surgery.
- Practice performance was around 12–13 correct out of 25.
Key realization
- They couldn’t efficiently keep returning to surgery repeatedly.
- Internal medicine would require ~10x the repetition/time compared to what they could manage.
C) Using practice-question series to diagnose weaknesses
They recommend and used a structured progression through question sets:
- Bought 24-test series and Pretus series.
Suggested sequence
- Buy/solve from the end (most up-to-date / most relevant for their purposes).
- Solve plan: 7 → 6 → 5 → down to 1.
Why they liked the 24-test series
- It’s lesson-by-lesson.
- It shows score changes per subject (increases/decreases clearly).
D) Placing basic sciences strategically (Physics/Pathology) rather than in the “standard order”
They usually think the logical order would be physiology → internal medicine, etc., but they adjusted based on preference:
- They disliked basic sciences and wanted to stay closer to the clinic.
Their flow (as described)
- After internal medicine, they did physiology + pathology to get basics out of the way.
Why internal medicine connects well
- “Once you know the clinical presentation,” learning the mechanism fits naturally.
Alternative order
- Physiology first → pathology → internal medicine
Modular approach They liked a “modular” method:
- Study the same system across subjects in sequence—e.g., cardiology:
- cardiology in internal medicine
- cardiology in physiology
- cardiology in pathology
This helps because concepts repeat in a short time and “flow faster,” which matters because:
- TUS is a race against time.
E) “Topic-to-topic” rapid switching during question solving (fresh knowledge)
They recommend switching from one topic to closely related question sets without waiting too long:
- After finishing a topic, immediately solve questions from that topic.
Why it works
- Knowledge stays “fresh,” boosting morale.
- Often you can skip reading explanations if the question was straightforward and recently learned.
When to read explanations Read explanations if:
- you missed it
- you are not fully sure
- you had doubts
Skip explanations if you’re:
- 100% sure
- and the question is easy.
F) E-learning + completing question sets quickly
In the final ~2 months before the March exam:
- They shifted mostly to e-learning.
- Once lessons ended, they had also finished all exam question sets.
They claim they didn’t rely much on textbooks at this stage because:
- they solved so many practice tests.
4) What they say NOT to do (common mistakes / warnings)
- Don’t cling to habits that slow you down
- e.g., don’t skip pages until you fully understand every part.
- Don’t treat it like an “intelligence test”
- The exam requires tactics.
- If something isn’t working with your style, switch tactics instead of being stubborn.
- Don’t try to learn everything
- Their biggest prior mistake was aiming to learn everything rather than targeting what yields points.
- Focus on:
- learning enough to reliably answer easy/medium questions
- then refining details
- Don’t waste time on content that won’t help
- For pediatrics, some topics are mostly rote (e.g., vaccine schedules).
- They initially didn’t read them—but practice tests showed those sections mattered, so they adapted.
5) Their “marking system” for practice tests (detailed method)
They describe a system to reduce time spent rereading explanations.
After answering each question:
- If you’re 100% sure → mark with a checkmark
- so you won’t read the explanation later
- If you’re ~50% sure / guessed slightly → mark with a question mark
- If you’re unsure → mark with a minus sign
- their interpretation: you likely don’t know the subject
Key emphasis
- If marked as unknown, you should read the topic in the textbook too.
- Simply stating the question isn’t enough—you need real learning.
6) Managing the last months for the next target (March → August)
After March
- Their rank dropped in the “M…” process (about 600 → 1600).
- They believe even a ~5% score change can drastically affect outcomes.
They adjusted:
- Took a break period (dancing/show activities).
- But they warn: don’t take too many breaks between attempts, because it sets you back.
Their August strategy (fine-tuning for top performance)
Because they were already “top 1000,” they focused on:
- Quick review
- Their practice scores had dropped, so they did rapid review:
- “glancing over what you already know”
- only upgrading weaker areas
- Principle: if it feels identical every time, you’re not learning—refresh intelligently.
- Their practice scores had dropped, so they did rapid review:
- Full practice tests again
- to complete the second phase.
- More question books
- especially case-based materials.
They also discuss increasing difficulty selectively:
- secure easy/medium points first to reach top 1000
- then tackle harder challenges to move beyond
7) Critique of case studies (Professor Atilla materials)
They used extra “case study” resources from Professor Atilla (including):
- internal medicine/pediatrics case-question style books
- a final review with questions (“The Whole Thing” per the subtitle)
They found:
- case studies were very difficult, even for someone scoring 74
- therefore, they advise not going too deep there
They did like one of the final-review question books.
8) General lifestyle/study advice (especially for working in mornings)
Daily routine / environment
- If possible, aim to be a morning worker
- they wake up early
- struggle to study at night
- Try to delay heavy eating until after breakfast timing.
- Structure work so you can use the “whole free day” efficiently.
Meals and health
- Avoid overeating (studying can become sedentary):
- less movement → joint/muscle weakening → weight gain
- Avoid foods with a high glycemic index
- can cause blood sugar spikes/drops
- may lead to shakiness during study
- Study from home if feasible:
- impacts food quality, cost, and time (including commuting/getting ready)
- If not, other study spaces are acceptable (they studied at cafes/libraries earlier due to home conditions).
Break habits (phone distraction)
- Don’t take long breaks.
- If using your phone during breaks, it can damage the next session by:
- replaying images in your head
- making you feel not rested
- Instead, meet basics:
- toilet
- water
- light stretching
9) How to decide what to study without overbuying videos
They argue videos aren’t automatically necessary:
- instructors highlight the important parts (e.g., bold text)
- during first reading:
- you can skip non-bold parts (but read quickly if needed)
Core effectiveness rule
- The most important indicator is what appears in practice questions.
Cost-effective suggestion
- Only buy the video lesson you truly need, rather than everything.
Category
Educational
Share this summary
Is the summary off?
If you think the summary is inaccurate, you can reprocess it with the latest model.