Summary of "SOSIALISASI PELAKSANAAN SPI TAHUN 2025 DAN TINDAK LANJUT HASIL SPI 2024"

The webinar focuses on the implementation of the Integrity Assessment Survey (SPI) for 2025 and the follow-up actions based on the 2024 SPI results. SPI serves as a critical anti-corruption instrument that not only measures integrity levels within ministries, institutions, and local governments but also identifies corruption vulnerabilities and provides actionable recommendations for improvement. The event highlights the strategic role of SPI in supporting Indonesia’s bureaucratic reform and the national vision toward Indonesia Emas 2045.

Main Financial Strategies, Market Analyses, and Business Trends:

SPI as an Anti-Corruption and Integrity Tool: SPI measures the national integrity index and identifies corruption risks, complementing global corruption perception indices. It supports bureaucratic reform by embedding integrity in governance culture, thus preventing budget leaks and improving public service quality.
Integration with Bureaucratic Reform: SPI results are integrated into bureaucratic reform assessments, particularly as a key indicator (with a 10% weight) for clean and corruption-free governance. The reform agenda emphasizes character building, transparency, conflict of interest management, and leadership that inspires cultural change.
Data-Driven Governance and Policy Making: SPI encourages the use of credible and valid data to formulate policies and monitor improvements. Collaboration among ministries, local governments, and oversight bodies is essential to build a sustainable corruption prevention ecosystem.
Focus on Sustainable and Measurable Improvements: Emphasis on continuous follow-up, monitoring, and evaluation of action plans based on SPI findings to ensure real transformation in governance and public service delivery.

Methodology and Step-by-Step Guide for SPI Implementation and Follow-up:

Preparation Phase (April - May): - Socialization and commitment signing by heads of ministries/institutions and local governments. - Submission of participant forms and population data updates.
Data Collection Phase (May - July): - Collection and updating of internal and external respondent data (employees, service users, vendors). - Use of multi-stage sampling methods, especially for large institutions. - Survey conducted primarily online via QR codes, emails, and WhatsApp.
Survey Implementation (July - October): - Data collection through online questionnaires targeting internal employees, external service users, and experts. - Focus on assessing anti-corruption systems, human resource management, budget management, service delivery, and conflict of interest.
Data Processing and Quality Control (November - December): - Data validation, correction factor application (based on corruption prevalence and survey integrity). - Field verification for anomalies or suspicious data. - Final results announced on International Anti-Corruption Day (December 9).
Follow-up Action Plan Development (January - April next year): - Ministries and local governments identify root causes of low scores and corruption risks. - Conduct internal discussions and stakeholder FGDs to refine recommendations. - Draft and submit detailed, actionable follow-up plans.
Implementation and Monitoring (May - December next year): - Execute follow-up plans with periodic progress reporting (quarterly/semester). - Upload progress and supporting evidence via the online monitoring platform (jaga.id). - Continuous evaluation and mentoring by KPK and other supervisory bodies.
Cycle Continuation: - SPI measurement conducted biennially to allow time for follow-up and improvement actions. - Monitoring and evaluation in the off years to track progress.

Key Points and Recommendations:

SPI is more than a measurement tool; it is a moral and managerial compass guiding governance improvement.
Leadership plays a crucial role in fostering a culture of integrity and driving bureaucratic reform beyond procedural compliance.
Collaboration between central and regional governments is essential for effective corruption prevention and governance transformation.
Integrity must be embedded in policies, procedures, and organizational culture to build public trust and improve service delivery.
Data transparency and honesty in survey implementation are critical to ensure accurate and fair results.
Action plans must be concrete, context-specific, and implemented earnestly, not just formalities.
The correction factor adjusts SPI scores based on corruption prevalence and survey integrity, ensuring fairness and accountability.
Challenges such as organizational restructuring require flexible approaches to measurement and follow-up.

Presenters and Sources:

Mr. Setyo Budianto – Chairman of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK)
Mrs. Rini Widianti – Minister of State Apparatus Empowerment and Bureaucratic Reform (KemenPAN RB)
Mr. Bima Arya Sugiarto – Deputy Minister of Home Affairs
Mrs. Aida Ratna – Director of KPK Monitoring
Mr