Video summary

Ibanez Talman TMB30 Short Scale Bass - Budget Shorty Comes Up a Bit Short - LowEndLobster Review

Main summary

Key takeaways

Product Review

Product Reviewed

Ibanez Talman TMB30 short-scale bass — a budget “Talman” model (noted as one of the cheapest short-scale basses from a mainstream brand).


Key Features Mentioned

Form / Appearance

  • Talman shape, described as a blend of a Jaguar and a less-Paul-ish look
  • Available in vintage off-white, black, and mint green

Pickups / Controls (PJ Layout)

  • Ibanez Dynamics P: split-coil P pickup
  • Ibanez Dynamics J: single-coil J pickup
  • Passive electronics (explicitly no active preamp)
    • Contrasts with full-scale Talman models that the reviewer claims use a 2-band active preamp
  • Controls: Volume / Volume / Tone
  • Tone knob behavior:
    • The reviewer says it acts almost like an on/off switch
    • Around 50%, sound is nearly the same as 100%
    • The reviewer mainly demonstrates tone fully open vs fully closed

Neck / Playability

  • 20-fret maple neck
  • “Joba” fingerboard
  • 41 mm nut width
  • D-shaped, “fatter” neck profile
  • 9.5” radius (more vintage-style than some flatter radii on certain Soundgear models)

Hardware

  • High-quality bridge for the price
  • String-height saddle adjustments with features described as limiting side-to-side movement
  • Paddle headstock (large; described as love/hate)
  • Large, heavy Ibanez tuners
  • Neck dive is a known Talman issue and is confirmed on this unit

Build / Weight

  • Made in Indonesia
  • Passive back: no battery box / no control cavity
  • Approx. 8 lb for the reviewed unit
    • Light enough “for a short scale,” but neck-heavy balance still causes issues

Accessories / What’s Included

  • No case included
    • Budget pricing: “you don’t get any sort of case or anything”

Sound / Performance Observations

Overall Tonal Character

  • Pickups described as leaning bright and high output

Tone Knob Behavior (Major Criticism)

  • With tone at 50%, sound is said to be almost identical to 100%
  • The reviewer mainly compares fully open vs fully closed

P Pickup (Split-Coil P)

  • Very powerful and rich
  • With tone all the way down:
    • described as a nice fat vintage tone (where it “shines”)
  • Picking/slapping works well with higher output
  • Lowering pickup height is described as not easy (or pickups resisted adjustment)

J Pickup (Single-Coil J)

  • With tone open:
    • bright and “messy”
  • With tone down:
    • sounds better than open, but still not preferred
  • Hum/noise expectations:
    • single-coil hum likely in noisy environments (and mentioned)

Both Pickups Together

  • With tone open:
    • “not too bad” when picked
  • With tone down:
    • again tied to the idea that tone down gets fatter

User Experience / Ergonomics

  • Poor balance: significant neck dive both with and without a strap
  • Heavy hardware impact:
    • heavy tuners + large headstock reportedly “pull out my shirt”
  • Body comfort:
    • body shape is “decently comfortable,” but the weighty neck reduces enjoyment
  • Suggested use case:
    • positioned as a short-scale beginner option, though the reviewer argues better choices exist

Price and Comparisons

Price

  • About $229
    • described as unusually low for mainstream short-scale options

Comparisons Mentioned

  • The reviewer plans to compare it later to a stock Harley Benton Mustang
  • Also compared to pricing of:
    • Squier Bronco
    • Harley Benton Mustangs

Market Context

  • Reviewer claims the under-$500 short-scale market is very hot
  • This model is said to not stand out enough

Pros (From the Review)

  • Good hardware / bridge quality for the price
  • 20-fret neck + vintage-style 9.5” radius
  • High-output split-P pickup with usable fat vintage tone when tone is turned down
  • Decent short-scale weight (~8 lb), though balance is still poor
  • Passive simplicity (no battery box)

Cons (From the Review)

  • Major neck dive (“serious” and persistent even with a strap)
  • Tone knob acts like an on/off switch (50% doesn’t meaningfully change tone)
  • Overall tone overly bright
    • especially with the J pickup and/or tone open
  • J pickup hum / noisy single-coil issues mentioned
  • Ergonomics suffer due to balance
  • Budget misses the mark on component choices
  • No case included

Ratings

  • Overall rating: 2 claws out of 5

Unique Points / Summary of Distinct Claims

  1. Very budget-friendly mainstream short-scale (among Ibanez’s cheapest short scales).
  2. PJ set: split-P + single-J, passive.
  3. Passive design contrasts with full-scale Talman models allegedly having active 2-band preamps.
  4. Tone control behaves basically on/off; 50% ≈ 100%.
  5. P pickup is powerful/rich and best as fat vintage tone with tone fully down.
  6. J pickup sounds bright/messy with tone open; likely hum/noisy in real environments.
  7. Both pickups are “not too bad” with tone open (when picked), while tone down generally improves character.
  8. Bridge/saddle area described as surprisingly premium for the price.
  9. Neck specs: 20-fret maple, 41 mm nut, D-shaped profile, 9.5” radius.
  10. Large paddle headstock + heavy tuners contribute to severe neck dive.
  11. Made in Indonesia; passive back with no cavities/battery box.
  12. Weight around 8 lb.
  13. Strap doesn’t fix neck dive (balance still pulls down).
  14. Price about $229; compared against Squier Bronco and Harley Benton Mustang pricing.
  15. No case included.
  16. Reviewer suggests there are better short-scale options under $500; this one doesn’t deliver enough.

Speakers / Separate Views

  • Single primary speaker: (Lobster / LowEndLobster)
    • All major pros/cons, sound demos, balance testing, and the final numeric rating come from this reviewer.

Concise Verdict / Recommendation

Not recommended as a top-value budget short-scale despite nice bridge/build details and a strong split-P pickup. The reviewer’s biggest deal-breakers are severe neck dive and a tone knob that doesn’t function smoothly, resulting in an overall overly bright and awkward playing experience.

Rating: 2/5 claws.

Rate this summary

Your feedback will help improve summaries.

Improve this summary

Reprocess with a stronger model when the summary feels incomplete or inaccurate.

Pro

Translate summary in another language

Pro

Ask questions to this video

Chat for follow-up questions, clarifications, and source-backed answers.

Coming soon

Share this summary

Original video