Summary of "Kısaca Battlefield 6"
Summary of Kısaca Battlefield 6
Overview
The video provides a detailed critique of Battlefield 6, focusing on its gameplay, modes, design decisions, and overall player experience. The creator intentionally delayed the review to gather extended gameplay experience and observe post-launch changes, which unfortunately confirmed many of his concerns.
Storyline
- Battlefield 6 includes a story mode designed for 4-player co-op.
- The story mode is described as one of the worst, featuring empty characters, a weak villain, and long, boring missions.
- AI teammates perform poorly, suggesting the mode was rushed or poorly implemented.
- The reviewer rates the story mode 0/10.
Gameplay Highlights
- Core gameplay and combat mechanics are fun and satisfying.
- Destruction effects (e.g., blowing up tanks and buildings) remain impressive.
- Gameplay quality is a significant improvement over Battlefield 2042.
- However, many other elements severely detract from the experience.
Key Criticisms & Issues
Maps
- Maps are mostly small and cramped, contrary to Battlefield’s traditional large-scale maps.
- Out of 9 maps, only 2 are large, and one is a reused Battlefield 3 map.
- Small map design reduces the classic Battlefield feel and gameplay pacing.
Weapon System (Open Weapon vs. Class-Restricted)
- Traditionally, Battlefield locked weapons to specific classes (e.g., snipers only use sniper rifles).
- Battlefield 6 introduces an “open weapon” system where any class can use any weapon, breaking this tradition.
- This change is driven by monetization goals, allowing more weapon skins to be sold.
- The “close weapon” (traditional) mode is hidden and difficult to find in the menu, pushing players toward open weapon mode.
- Developers publicly claimed players preferred open weapon mode based on beta data, but this was seen as manipulation.
Character Customization & Realism
- The game forces players to use female characters on the NATO side in certain classes, with no option to choose male characters.
- This decision is criticized for ruining immersion and realism.
- The official support team seemed unaware of these restrictions, indicating poor internal knowledge of the game.
- The reviewer laments the trend of games becoming overly focused on political correctness or “Netflix-style” content.
User Interface & Server Browsing
- The game interface is confusing and poorly designed.
- Finding game modes or servers is difficult compared to older Battlefield games.
- The server browser is minimal and lacks customization options.
- There are no traditional community-run servers with custom rules, which historically helped keep Battlefield games alive long-term.
- This lack of server freedom is seen as a deliberate move to kill Battlefield 6’s longevity and force players into future titles.
Skins & Monetization
- Despite initial promises of realism, colorful and flashy skins were introduced just weeks after release.
- This shift disappoints players who want a serious war atmosphere.
- The reviewer fears the game will become increasingly casual and less immersive over time due to these cosmetic changes.
Portal Mode
- Portal mode allows players to create and share custom maps.
- However, developers have banned certain types of content (e.g., iconic maps from other games), severely limiting creativity.
- As a result, Portal mode is considered empty and unlikely to produce meaningful content.
Battle Royale Mode
- Planned but not yet released at the time of the video.
- The reviewer expresses skepticism and frustration, implying it may not improve the game’s appeal.
Strategies or Tips
- No explicit gameplay strategies or tips are provided.
- The reviewer encourages players who want a better Battlefield experience to stick with older titles like Battlefield 4.
- He invites viewers to join him on Battlefield 4’s Shanghai server, highlighting the better gameplay and community there.
Final Thoughts
- Battlefield 6 has solid core gameplay but is heavily undermined by poor design decisions, monetization strategies, and a lack of respect for the series’ traditions.
- The game seems targeted at a younger, more casual audience (e.g., TikTok generation), alienating longtime fans.
- The reviewer has lost faith in Battlefield 6 and plans to return to older Battlefield games instead.
Featured Gamer / Source
- The video is a personal review and critique by the YouTuber who made the video (name not specified in subtitles).
- Mentions references to official DICE (the developer) communications and community feedback.
Summary: Battlefield 6 offers fun gameplay but is marred by small maps, a controversial weapon system, forced character choices, poor UI, limited server options, and a shift away from realism. The reviewer strongly recommends sticking to older Battlefield titles for a better experience.
Category
Gaming
