Summary of "Ranking 10 BEST Tiny Lenses UNDER $100!"
Product being reviewed
The video reviews and ranks 10 “tiny / pancake” lenses under $100, focusing on which are actually worth buying. The host uses a tier system (A, B, C) and gives an overall “prestigious” recommendation at the end.
Key points (features / what’s notable)
- All lenses are priced under $100, with one brief exception that’s “on sale” to fit the range.
- Emphasis is on:
- Small form factor (“pancake” style)
- Image quality (sharpness, vignetting, flares)
- Ease of use (handling, covers, fixed apertures, autofocus vs manual)
- Multiple lenses have fixed apertures (e.g., f/8 or f/10), which limits low-light performance and often requires higher ISO.
Ranked lenses with pros/cons and tier placement
1) 7Artisans 35mm f/5.6 — $99 — A tier
Pros
- Very well-built; “almost entirely metal.”
- Includes a free pouch.
- Focus dial has a useful rotating lens cover mechanism.
- Sharp center detail; good performance for the price.
- Mild corner vignetting, easily fixable in Lightroom.
Cons
- Aperture is only f/5.6 (not extremely wide).
- Host finds the front cover design visually creepy (subjective).
2) “Oreo cookie” plastic lens cap lens (labeled 32mm f/10) — ~$19 (variants around $76 for multiple colors) — seat / worst tier
Pros
- Fun novelty; no controls—just put on and shoot.
- Images match the stated specs (around 32mm f/10).
Cons
- Cheap plastic look/quality: soft, hazy “toy lens” rendering.
- Likely to be stored away; host predicts it won’t be used often.
- No meaningful photographic performance advantage.
3) Funleader 18mm f/8 Pro — $105 list, ~$89 on sale — B tier
Pros
- Metal construction.
- Comes with a nice zip-up semi-hard case.
- Very wide 18mm full-frame view; good for landscapes/architecture.
- Center sharpness is “pretty good.”
Cons
- Aperture locked at f/8 → not great in low light.
- Focus ring is slightly recessed and fiddly.
- Very dark, distracting vignette at edges; hard to remove in Lightroom.
4) Asahi 10mm f/8 Mark I “pancake fisheye” — < $80 — A tier
Pros
- Metal, textured focus ring; easy to locate by touch.
- Comes with a UV filter already attached.
- Allows creative filter stacking.
- Sharp enough; corners vignette but fairly easy to fix in post.
- On full frame (without crop) can show a circular fisheye effect.
Cons
- Fixed f/8 limits low-light usability.
- On full frame without crop, the fisheye effect can be exaggerated; with crop it’s more controlled.
5) TTArtisan 25mm f/2 (APSC) — ~$64 — S tier
Pros
- Metal build.
- Clicked manual aperture ring.
- Max aperture f/2 → strong background blur; good for low light.
- Very sharp even at f/2.
- On crop, becomes ~37.5mm FF look, making it versatile (street, travel, portraits, landscapes).
Cons
- On full frame you must use crop mode; otherwise heavy edge vignette.
6) SG Image 18mm f/6.3 — $48 — A tier
Pros
- Very thin, small, metal construction.
- Includes a lens element cover.
- Tactile focus lever; snaps closed/open properly (host liked this improvement vs others).
- Minimum focus distance ~20 cm (best in the group).
- Can accept 49mm screw-on filters via lens hood threading.
- Sharpness is “pretty good.”
- Vignetting is heavy but performance is still decent for the price.
Cons
- Very heavy vignetting at corners.
7) 3D-printed 28mm f/10 stereoscopic dual-lens — just over $19 — bin / very low
Pros
- Enables stereoscopic-style animated gifts by capturing two slightly different angles.
- Extremely cheap.
Cons
- Limited focus range (only useful for relatively far subjects).
- Large overlap/ghosting area in the center reduces motion/quality even after editing.
- Host finds it underwhelming overall.
8) Panasonic Lumix GM1 anecdote lens: same 3D-printed 28mm f/10 (tested on full frame, Sony A7C II) — B tier (contextual)
Pros (in context)
- Works “not terrible” with the right camera pairing (implied travel practicality).
- Center sharpness “isn’t all that bad” even on full frame.
Cons
- Corners vignette extremely badly and is “almost impossible” to fix.
- Best suited to crop sensor cameras.
- Host recommends the SG 18mm instead for similarly tiny size/weight and similar specs.
(This segment reiterates the same stereoscopic-ish 3D-printed lens but discusses camera pairing and why it lands in B tier.)
9) Pocket Dispo 3D-printed lens (disposable-film-derived look) — ~$50 — C tier
Pros
- Intended as a creative look / filter-like effect.
- Uses lens elements removed from used disposable film cameras, in a 3D-printed housing.
- Photos match the disposable-camera aesthetic (as intended).
Cons
- Too expensive for the quality; a similar item can be $19 and uses basically the same “disposable” concept, but with one lens.
- Limited use case; not a serious main lens.
10) VRO 28mm f/4.5 pancake — $99 — S tier (best overall)
Pros
- Smallest/lightest in the lineup; full-frame compatible.
- Fully autofocus.
- Fast aperture f/4.5 (fixed).
- Only manual control is a front lever for opening/closing the lens cover—no manual focus ring.
- Autofocus is “quick and accurate.”
- Sharp edge-to-edge; minor issues like flaring in side lighting and some vignetting.
- Great for candid photography; “total joy to use.”
Cons
- Relies entirely on AF (no manual focus).
- Minor flaring and vignetting.
Comparisons made
Within-list comparisons
- The Asahi 10mm gets credit for usable filter stacking.
- The Funleader 18mm is criticized mainly for vignetting and fiddliness, despite higher price.
- The SG 18mm is recommended over the 28mm 3D-printed lens due to similar tiny size but better practicality.
- Pocket Dispo is compared to a $19 disposable-style option as better value.
Camera format comparisons
- Some lenses are effectively APSC-only in practice:
- TTArtisan 25mm requires crop mode on full frame.
- The 28mm 3D-printed lens performs much better on crop sensors.
- Full-frame compatibility is praised for:
- 7Artisans 35mm
- Funleader 18mm
- Asahi 10mm (for circular fisheye when uncropped)
- Especially VRO 28mm f/4.5
Unique user experience notes (non-image-quality)
- Lens cover mechanisms vary:
- 7Artisans uses a twisting cover mechanism (useful but visually odd to the host).
- Funleader lacks that kind of cover.
- SG Image cover and focus lever are described as well-designed and reliable (snaps prevent accidental semi-open).
- VRO uses a simple lever-only cover system and has no manual focus.
Pros vs Cons summary (overall themes)
Most praised
- High sharpness for price.
- Strong build quality (metal).
- Practical usability (especially autofocus and handling).
Most criticized
- Vignetting (sometimes extreme and hard to correct).
- Fixed small apertures (f/8, f/10, f/6.3), limiting low-light flexibility.
- Novelty/creative lenses that are limited in use or require heavy editing.
Speakers
- Only the main host (“Tom”) is present in the subtitles. No other speaker’s distinct viewpoint appears aside from references to other channels/reviews.
Numerical values / pricing mentioned
- 7Artisans 35mm f/5.6: $99
- Oreo cookie lens: ~$19 (32mm f/10); mentions 25mm f/10 version; multi-color sets around $76
- Funleader 18mm f/8 Pro: $105 list, ~$89 sale
- Asahi 10mm f/8 Mark I: < $80
- TTArtisan 25mm f/2: ~$64
- SG Image 18mm f/6.3: $48
- 3D-printed stereoscopic dual-lens 28mm f/10: just over $19
- Pocket Dispo disposable-style lens: ~$50; comparable alternative $19
- VRO 28mm f/4.5: $99
- SG Image minimum focus distance: ~20 cm
- Tier labels mentioned: A / B / C, plus “bin”/seat for worst picks.
Concise verdict / recommendation
- Best overall pick: VRO 28mm f/4.5 pancake ($99) — full-frame, fully autofocus, sharp edge-to-edge, small/light, and easy to use.
- Best value / strongest all-rounder for low light: TTArtisan 25mm f/2 (APSC, ~ $64) — very sharp at f/2 and versatile, but requires crop mode on full frame.
- Avoid / only novelty: cookie plastic lens and the 3D-printed stereoscopic dual-lens are mostly gimmicks; Pocket Dispo is a special-effects tool rather than a daily lens.
Category
Product Review
Share this summary
Is the summary off?
If you think the summary is inaccurate, you can reprocess it with the latest model.
Preparing reprocess...