Summary of Printz v. United States Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

Summary of Printz v. United States Case Brief

Main Ideas and Concepts:

Methodology and Key Points:

Speakers/Sources Featured:

This case is significant for its implications on federalism and the limits of congressional power over state officials.

Notable Quotes

01:34 — « The court held that under the 10th Amendment's anti-commandeering principle, Congress may not compel state officials to administer a federal regulatory program. »
02:20 — « Scalia noted that the act upset the careful balance of power between the federal government and the states. »
02:36 — « Additionally, the court held that the Brady Act violated the constitutional separation of powers principle because the power to execute the laws is provided to the president and federal executive branch officials only. »
03:11 — « As a result, the court held that the Brady Act's employment of state officers to conduct background searches was unconstitutional. »
04:34 — « Printz versus United States was a monumental federalism case memorable for its narrow interpretation of federal power and its staunch protection of state autonomy from federal incursion. »

Category

Educational

Video