Summary of Amit Shah की एजेंसी दिलवायेगी Pragya Singh Thakur को फाँसी? । Ashok Wankhede । #ashokkumarpandey

Video Summary

The video features a detailed discussion on two major current issues: the recent Pahalgam Attack in Kashmir and the sudden demand by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) for the death penalty for former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur in the Malegaon Blast Case.

Key Points:

  1. Pahalgam Attack and Kashmir Situation:
    • The hosts condemn the narrative pushed by mainstream media that frames the Pahalgam Attack as a Hindu-Muslim conflict, calling it a divisive narrative promoted by Pakistan and its sympathizers.
    • Eyewitness accounts reveal that despite some terrorists targeting people based on religion, many local Kashmiris, irrespective of religion, helped the wounded and tried to save lives.
    • The discussion highlights the lack of adequate security and intelligence failure leading to the attack, questioning why security forces, including the Army and paramilitary, were absent despite prior intelligence inputs.
    • The cancellation of a Prime Minister’s program in the area before the attack raises suspicions about foreknowledge.
    • The hosts emphasize the unity and hospitality of Kashmiris and denounce attempts to create communal rifts.
    • They also mention the Kashmiri Pandit community’s concerns and note that the attackers of Kashmiri Pandits remain unidentified, warning against spreading hatred.
  2. Pragya Singh Thakur and Malegaon Blast Case:
    • Pragya Singh Thakur, a former BJP MP, has been accused in the 2008 Malegaon Blast Case in which a motorcycle linked to her was used in the attack near a mosque during Ramadan, killing six and injuring many.
    • Despite the case ongoing for 17 years and Pragya’s political career (including her tenure as MP), the NIA had previously appeared to weaken the case or find no solid proof against her and co-accused Colonel Prasad Purohit and others.
    • Suddenly, the NIA has submitted a 1500-page charge sheet demanding the death penalty for Pragya and others, marking a significant reversal.
    • The final court verdict is awaited on May 8, with the judge noting 323 witnesses and 32 who changed statements under pressure.
    • The hosts speculate about internal political tussles influencing this U-turn, possibly involving the Home Ministry led by Amit Shah, the PMO, the RSS, and national security advisor Ajit Doval.
    • They discuss the political implications of this development within BJP and RSS dynamics, including power struggles and influence over party leadership.
    • The hosts criticize the media for largely ignoring this major news and urge viewers to be aware of the political games behind the scenes.
  3. Broader Themes and Criticism:
    • The discussion condemns labeling terrorism based on religion (Hindu terrorism, Muslim terrorism) as cheap and divisive.
    • They stress that terrorism is terrorism regardless of faith and criticize those who exploit communal identities for political gains.
    • The video questions the effectiveness and sincerity of India’s security and intelligence apparatus, especially in handling terrorism threats.
    • The hosts call for introspection within India rather than blaming Pakistan alone, emphasizing national unity and truth.
    • They warn against media and political narratives that sow communal discord, which aligns with the interests of Pakistan.

Presenters/Contributors:

The conversation blends investigative commentary, political analysis, and critique of media and government handling of sensitive issues related to terrorism, communal harmony, and internal political conflicts.

Notable Quotes

— 03:14 — « Pakistan wants to ensure that there are Hindus and Muslims in this country so that this country can run and Pakistan can enjoy. This is the narration of Pakistan, which other agents of Pakistan are supporting by saying that this is a fight between Hindus and Muslims. A terrorist is a terrorist. »
— 12:39 — « I am completely against such cheap words like Hindu terrorism, Muslim terrorism. I do not believe at all that Muslim terrorism should be called on the basis of some people and similarly Hindu terrorism should be called on the basis of some people. »
— 19:54 — « Today they are demanding death penalty. It means that the charge sheet that has been filed, of 1500 pages, will contain those things which the NIA was suppressing and had to bail out. This is a matter of give and take. »
— 23:31 — « Ashok ji often jokingly tells us that Indian Muslims come to Kashmir only for pilgrimage, they do not come to visit at all. »
— 24:20 — « Those who are making it Hindu Muslim inside the country are actually speaking the Mann ki Baat of their Pakistani handlers, whether you want to listen to your Mann ki Baat, listen to Sir's Mann ki Baat or listen to the Pakistani handler's Mann ki Baat or listen to us, it is you who will decide. »

Category

News and Commentary

Summarize another video

Video