Summary of How to judge debates - Sharmila Parmanand

Main Ideas and Concepts

• Importance of Judging Standards:
  • Standardized judging practices are crucial for fair competition.
  • Participants deserve to know what to expect from judges, which helps in defending judging decisions.
• Criteria for Winning Debates:
  • The winning team is the one that persuades an average reasonable voter through logical and relevant Arguments.
  • Judges should assess Arguments based on their logical coherence and relevance rather than personal biases.
• Fairness in Debating Rules:
  • Certain rules exist to maintain fairness, such as the timing of revealing models and extensions.
  • Teams must adhere to these rules to ensure a level playing field.
• Understanding the Motion and Definitions:
  • The "house" in a motion can refer to various actors, and teams must debate at the level of generality specified in the motion.
  • Definitions must be reasonable interpretations of the motion; unfair Definitions can be challenged.
• Clashes and Burdens:
  • Both teams have equal burdens to prove their cases.
  • The opposition must show that their alternative is better or less harmful than the proposition’s policy.
• Extensions and New Material:
  • Closing teams can gain credit for new contributions, but these must be distinct from the opening team's Arguments.
  • New material introduced in summary speeches is generally not allowed, with specific exceptions.
• Judging Process:
  • Good judging focuses on the quality of Arguments rather than merely counting rule violations.
  • Judges should engage with the Arguments presented and evaluate their importance and relevance in the debate.
• Comparing Teams:
  • Assessing teams on the same bench is easier than comparing diagonally.
  • Closing teams should be evaluated based on their ability to respond to the opening team's Arguments.
• Panel Discussions:
  • Panel Discussions should focus on collaborative decision-making rather than competition.
  • Chairs should facilitate productive discussions and ensure all teams are fairly evaluated.

Methodology and Instructions

• Judging Criteria:
  • Evaluate based on logical and relevant Arguments.
  • Use a standardized set of judging guidelines for fairness.
• Assessing Definitions:
  • Determine if Definitions are reasonable interpretations.
  • Challenge Definitions only if they distort the motion’s meaning.
• Evaluating Arguments:
  • Compare the quality of Arguments made by both teams.
  • Look for extensions and new contributions from closing teams.
• Handling Disagreements in Panels:
  • Start discussions by summarizing initial thoughts and areas of agreement.
  • Focus on disagreements and clarify any confusion about what was said during the debate.

Speakers

• Sharmila Parmanand (Main Speaker)

Notable Quotes

— 02:09 — « Today, the weather was ok. »

— 03:02 — « Dog treats are the greatest invention ever. »

Category

Educational

Video