Summary of "Ferdinand Schockenhoff - Capgemini Invent - Product development 2030+"
Product development 2030+
(Ferdinand Schockenhoff, Senior Manager, Digital Engineering & R&D, Capgemini Invent)
Context
- Speaker: Ferdinand Schockenhoff (introduced by Jan).
- Focus: Automotive-centered examples presented as transferable to other industries.
- Goal: Make product development faster, cheaper, higher-quality and multi-functional through AI and digitization.
Key trends motivating change
- Increasing time-to-market and cost pressure.
- Growing software content and electrification in products.
- New competitors and business models.
- Current engineering work is often manual (Office tools, phone calls) and not machine-actionable — agents cannot operate unless development artifacts are digitized and standardized.
High-level model for AI-driven product development
-
Systems engineering foundation
- Model effect chains: capture functional and physical interactions between components and roles (who talks to whom).
- Digitize these models so they are explicit rather than implicit in engineers’ heads.
-
Add simulations and structured data
- Describe component or black-box behavior via simulations, databases and workflows.
- Ensure each part has defined inputs/outputs and physical boundaries.
-
Deploy AI agents on top
- Only after steps 1–2 can autonomous agents (multi-agent systems) meaningfully design, integrate and make decisions.
- Example: a battery-geometry agent + vehicle-integration agent + cost/approval agent working together.
Implementation approach — combined foundation + use-case driven
Do foundational modernization in parallel with concrete AI use cases.
-
Standards & methods
- Use consistent modeling languages/methods across effect chains (e.g., SysML-type approaches).
-
IT platforms
- Prefer standardized, scalable platforms that provide data continuity and an integrated UX over one-off tools.
-
Structured data
- Choose a function- or system-oriented end-to-end data architecture and enforce it.
-
Organizational alignment
- Rethink responsibilities and create roles that enable automated/agent-driven steps.
Practical guide — steps for use-case implementation
-
Process selection
- Identify high-impact, high-automation, repeatable engineering tasks (avoid “nice-to-have” chatbots).
-
Define clear end-to-end boundaries
- Specify explicit start and end points for the automated task.
-
Data check
- Confirm available input data and required outputs (e.g., CAD positions, engineering BOM → collision-free geometry + interference report).
-
Stepwise decomposition
- Break the process into subprocesses/tasks; implement each as an agent where sensible.
-
Enablement
- Train and onboard engineers and process owners; adjust organization and governance.
-
Scale
- Chain agents into multi-agent systems; reuse and recycle agents across use cases.
Example use case: Battery geometry clearance check
- Inputs: data models (positions), engineering BOM.
- Agent tasks:
- Run geometry/clearance checks.
- Generate interference report.
- Pass results to integration, cost, and approval agents.
- Output: collision-free geometry validated for manufacturing.
AI Factory / Platform concepts
- Build foundational tooling: platforms, sandboxes, infrastructure, and libraries of reusable agents/components.
- Embed governance, legal, compliance, and AI regulation into the strategy.
- Invest in upskilling across product development so agents are actually used and produce business impact.
“Agentic AI is arriving quickly; organizations that delay risk falling behind.”
Main recommendations / messages
- Combine foundational modernization with quick, high-impact use cases to demonstrate value and steer transformation.
- Focus on the processes engineers actually perform (value‑stream oriented).
- Without digitization and structured data, AI agents cannot be effective.
- Act fast to capture advantage from emerging agentic AI capabilities.
Main speakers / sources
- Ferdinand Schockenhoff — Senior Manager, Digital Engineering & R&D, Capgemini Invent
- Moderator / introducer: Jan (name not given in transcript)
- Organization referenced: Capgemini Invent
Category
Technology
Share this summary
Is the summary off?
If you think the summary is inaccurate, you can reprocess it with the latest model.
Preparing reprocess...