Summary of "Do Not Trap in the Hype! (Here is Ai Tool Realities)"

This video provides an in-depth review and ranking of over 22 viral AI tools used over the last two years, focusing on their real-world earning potential. The evaluation is based on three key factors:

Cost: Affordability and return on investment (ROI) potential.
User Experience (UX): Usability and ease of use.
Market Acceptability: Versatility, customization, and commercial viability of the AI tool's output.

The tools are categorized as Super (high earning potential), Average, or Bad based on these factors.

Key AI Tools Reviewed and Their Evaluations

N8N (Agent Builder)
- Purpose: AI workflow/agent builder mainly for backend automation and productivity.
- Strength: Highly customizable AI agents for stock trading, content automation, etc.
- Challenges: Requires coding knowledge and frontend hosting for commercial use; enterprise pricing undisclosed.
- Rating: Cost (3/5), UX (3/5), Market (4/5) → Good category
Perplexity
- Purpose: Research and productivity AI tool.
- Insight: Not designed for direct earning; more suited for research assistance.
- Rating: Cost (3/5), UX (5/5), Market (5/5) → Bad category (due to niche focus)
Notebook LM
- Purpose: Personalized research tool and AI podcast builder supporting 50+ languages.
- Use: Content creators use it for research to generate income indirectly.
- Rating: Cost (5/5), UX (good), Market (good) → Average category
MidJourney
- Purpose: Industry-standard AI image generation for creative content (posters, storyboards, animations).
- Features: Recently added a web interface and video generation model.
- Widely used by creators and ad agencies.
- Rating: Cost (5/5), UX (4-5/5), Market (5/5) → Super category
Runway ML
- Purpose: Industry leader in AI video generation with advanced features like reference-based character consistency.
- Use: Trailers, short films, advertising.
- Limitations: Occasional lag and inconsistency.
- Rating: Cost (4/5), UX (4/5), Market (5/5) → Super category
Cling
- Purpose: VFX-heavy AI video generation tool.
- Strength: Better detail in effects, popular for social media content.
- Issues: Inconsistent results, costly credit system.
- Rating: Cost (3/5), UX (4/5), Market (4/5) → Good category
Vivo3
- Purpose: Advanced AI video model, not fully accessible in India.
- Costly and requires VPN for access; integrated via APIs in some services.
- Rating: Cost (2/5), UX (4/5), Market (average) → Average category
11Labs
- Purpose: Voice cloning and automated content generation.
- Widely used by content creators, talent agencies, and publishers.
- High cost but excellent UX and market acceptance.
- Rating: Cost (5/5), UX (5/5), Market (5/5) → Super category
Cursor AI
- Purpose: Coding assistant AI.
- Benefits: Increases coder productivity, used by founders for app development.
- Rating: Cost (5/5), UX (4/5), Market (5/5) → Super category
Lovable AI
- Purpose: Coding AI, more for prototyping.
- Issues: Messy code output, security concerns.
- Rating: Cost (4/5), UX (4/5), Market (3/5) → Average category
Hagues Field AI
- Purpose: AI for trending VFX effects.
- Limitations: Poor consistency with custom prompts; mainly entertainment use.
- Rating: Cost (4/5), UX (2/5), Market (3/5) → Bad category
Pika Art
- Purpose: Effect-heavy AI tool for social media content.
- High cost and low market acceptance for commercial advertising.
- Rating: Cost (4/5), UX (good), Market (2/5) → Average category
Canva Magic Studio
- Purpose: Beginner-friendly graphic design and AI content creation.
- Integrates Vivo3 for video; balances speed over quality vs. Photoshop.
- Rating: Cost (4/5), UX (4/5), Market (4/5) → Good category