Summary of "Simple, Non-Commercial, Open Source Notes"
Goal and criteria
The creator wanted a Notion replacement with strict constraints:
- Free, non-commercial, and open source.
- Plain-text storage (notes remain usable as simple text files).
- Local / self‑hosted (no cloud vendor lock‑in).
- Optional per‑note encryption.
- Fast and simple — avoid sprawling “second brain” feature bloat.
- Syncable by any tool and addressable via version control.
Key design preference: notes should remain usable as plain text (viewable on many devices), syncable by whatever tool you choose, and manageable via VCS.
Why Notion was rejected
- Privacy concerns: cloud storage, model-training exposure, ad profiling.
- Poor performance: slow UI and database views, long page loads.
- Feature bloat: too many unnecessary “second brain” features.
Quick exclusions (didn’t meet plain‑text / non‑commercial / philosophical criteria)
The creator excluded these tools early:
- Obsidian, OneNote, Evernote, Roam, LogSeq, Typora, Boost Note, Standard Notes, Simplenote, Notable (no longer open), Mem.ai, Notes Nook, Google Keep.
- Non-plain-text or SQLite-backed apps: CherryTree, Laverna, Tomboy NG, TiddlyWiki, Joplin, Trilium.
- Dendron: admired for hierarchical flat-file naming but effectively ceased development during the creator’s search.
Shortlist and runners‑up
Runners‑up (met criteria but not chosen as the favorite):
- Zettlr (sometimes written Zettler?): a polished Markdown editor with GUI tables and a pretty editor; sometimes exhibits overly “fancy” UI behaviors.
- VNote: Markdown editor with separate edit/read modes; issues with read-mode and link-following in some environments.
- NB: a single bash‑script notes manager (terminal-friendly, supports linking/encryption/images); skipped because editor plugins already covered the same ground.
Main recommendations — reviews, features, pros & cons
1) Zim (desktop wiki)
Concept: hierarchical wiki-style notes where each folder is also a note; flat-file storage with a simple internal syntax.
Pros:
- Ultra‑simple and lightweight.
- Hierarchical organization (folders-as-notes).
- Snappy rich-text editor and useful plugins (tags, tables, tasks, journal, encryption).
- Minimal by default.
Cons:
- Custom syntax (not Markdown).
- Table plugin lacks tab-to-next-cell convenience.
- Default theme is unattractive; GTK theming on Windows may require manual tweaks.
Recommended for users who want a minimal, no‑frills note-taking app and dislike feature bloat.
2) QOwnNotes (native Markdown desktop app)
Concept: native double‑pane Markdown editor with strong Nextcloud integration.
Pros:
- Fast editor with real Markdown preview.
- No surprise JS behavior; native UI.
- Highly customizable UI (panels can be hidden).
- Hierarchical tags and convenient encrypted-notes feature.
- Built‑in Nextcloud sync with file version history.
- Theme options and per-editor font zoom (Ctrl + mouse wheel).
- Easy “open in file manager” convenience.
Cons:
- Markdown split‑view quirks: no inline images in the editor (images show in preview only).
- Some limitations are inherent to the Markdown split-view paradigm.
Recommended as the creator’s favorite “works exactly as expected” app for typical users wanting Markdown + sync.
3) Emacs + Org Mode (with Doom Emacs / Org‑roam)
Concept: heavyweight, extensible editor with org-mode — a plain‑text system for notes, tasks, agendas, and code execution.
Pros:
- Org-mode is extremely powerful: headings, folding, TODOs, agenda/scheduling.
- Outstanding plain‑text tables and in‑document code evaluation (“programmable spreadsheet”).
- Backlinks via org-roam and unique ID links (robust to renames/moves).
- GUI and terminal parity: same setup can run locally or over SSH.
- Massive automation and programmability.
Cons:
- High complexity and configuration overhead.
- Occasional breaking changes and heavy updates.
- Can be sluggish on lower‑spec machines and phones.
- Steep learning curve for non-developers.
Recommended for power users who want unlimited text-native features and automation.
4) Neovim / Vim + plugins (e.g., Neorg, vimwiki)
Concept: lightweight modal text editor with a rich plugin ecosystem for note-taking.
Pros:
- Fast, distraction‑free, and highly customizable.
- Great for turning text files into organized, linkable notes.
- Author uses hierarchical numeric filenames effectively.
Cons:
- High setup and maintenance cost (choosing/configuring plugins).
- Ecosystem churn (Lua vs Vimscript, package manager migrations).
- Plugins are more fragmented and immature compared to org-mode’s unified system.
Recommended for users who enjoy tinkering, want a minimalist fast editor, and accept ongoing configuration work.
Other editors / minimalists mentioned
- Cocoon: modal editor focused on doing one thing well; small wiki & table plugin — Unix-philosophy lean.
- Helix: similar to Cocoon but with more developer features; plugin story still immature.
- neatVI, Viz and similar tiny editors: extreme minimalism for “suckless”/hipster workflows.
Notable technical themes and advice
- Plain‑text and hierarchy: the author prefers hierarchical file naming (inspired by Dendron) so files self-organize and remain portable.
- Encryption: preference for per‑note encryption rather than only full‑disk encryption; QOwnNotes and various plugins support this.
- Sync/versioning: local‑first workflows using Nextcloud or git-based syncing are emphasized; ability to view/restore version history is a plus.
- Trade‑offs: simplicity and low maintenance (Zim, QOwnNotes) versus power/customizability (Emacs, Neovim).
- Productivity treadmill warning: avoid endless tweaking — pick a tool and use it.
Practical takeaways / recommendations
- Minimal, non-technical, stable solution: Zim.
- Simple Markdown with built‑in sync and encryption that “just works”: QOwnNotes.
- Maximal programmability and plain‑text power: Emacs + Org Mode (+ org‑roam).
- Minimal, fast, highly tweakable editor for config‑enthusiasts: Neovim + Neorg/vimwiki (expect maintenance).
- Extreme minimalists / Unix purists: explore Cocoon, Helix, or tiny vi clones.
Main speaker / sources
- Speaker: an unnamed YouTuber/reviewer presenting a personal search and evaluation of open‑source note apps.
- Primary projects and tools referenced: Notion, Dendron, Zettlr, VNote, NB (bash notes), Zim, QOwnNotes, Emacs, Doom Emacs, Org Mode, Org‑roam, Neovim/Vim, Neorg, NVChad, Cocoon, Helix, neatVI, Viz, Nextcloud, and various note apps (Obsidian, LogSeq, Joplin, Trilium, etc.).
Category
Technology
Share this summary
Is the summary off?
If you think the summary is inaccurate, you can reprocess it with the latest model.
Preparing reprocess...