Summary of "The Basics of the 1-1-1 trade!"
Finance-focused summary (strategy + performance + risk)
Performance / market comparison
-
Account performance (strategy account shown)
- Started year: $42,000
- Current P&L: +$3,758 (+8.94%)
- Timeline referenced: “over three months” → averaging ~3%/month
- Implied projection: ~36% annual return
- Management claim: strategy can make ~20%+ annually as a goal
-
Benchmark: SPY (S&P 500 ETF)
- Started year around $475
- Quoted current level around $520–$524.7 (auto-subtitle variance)
- Claimed SPY performance: about +9.5%
- Claim: strategy is slightly behind in bull markets, but holds up in down markets
-
Historical regime comparison (claims)
- 2022: Market -20%, strategy +24%
- 2023: Market +24%, strategy +20%
-
Core “why it works” claim
- In a down market, the strategy purportedly maintains gains (e.g., “if the market had been down 9%, I would still be up 9%”).
Portfolio / risk framework described (Greeks / allocation)
The presenter frames portfolio direction and option income via Greeks and buying power:
-
Delta
- Example: Delta = 62 interpreted as having directional exposure “equivalent of 62 shares of SPY”
- Meaning stated: bullish bias when positive
-
Theta (income rate)
- Example: Theta = 64 “theoretically should make $64/day”
- Recent results cited: about $750 in a week
- $750 / 7 ≈ $107/day (claimed outperformance vs theoretical)
-
Buying power / collateral
- Example: buying power $13,000 (stated as 28% of net liq)
- Rule mentioned: can use up to 50% of buying power when conditions are met
-
Conditions to allow more exposure
- Price above the 200-day moving average
- 10 exponential weekly moving average (EMA) above 20 (weekly trend filter)
- When conditions satisfied, the strategy says it is “really under-allocated” while still executing
-
Goal / recommendation tone (disclaimer-like statements included)
- Target return: minimum 20% annual return
- Speaker emphasis: “I don’t care what the market does… if I do 36% I’ve done well.”
- “Fun money” warning:
- Says not to use retirement money
- Use ~10%
- Consider matching/broad index investing otherwise
The “1-1-1 trade” methodology (explicit structure)
Ticker / instrument context
- Primary trading instrument shown: ES = E-mini S&P 500 futures
- Also references micro-sized variant MES for smaller accounts
- Benchmark referenced: SPY
Trade composition (two variants: 1-1-1 and 1-1-2)
-
“1-1-1” (primary focus)
- 1 out-of-the-money put debit spread (“put debit spread”)
- 1 out-of-the-money naked put (sold)
- Both are out-of-the-money; the naked put provides premium, and the debit spread provides downside “insurance” / shape.
-
“1-1-2” variant
- 1 put debit spread
- 2 out-of-the-money naked puts
- Mentions an ideal 1:1 ratio of naked puts to put debit spreads
Key parameter choices
-
Expiration / DTE
- Prefer selling ~120 days out (around four months)
- Example used: around 126 DTE
-
Put selection by Delta
- Sell a 10 Delta put
- Presenter equates “10 Delta” with roughly 10% probability of expiring in-the-money
- Stated objective: about 90% probability of staying out-of-the-money
Example trade details (numbers provided)
-
Underlying reference
- Underlying ES price shown around ~5335
-
Put strike chosen
- Strike: 4700, described as “10 Delta” (for naked put component)
-
Naked put (example)
- Premium received: $1,538
- Profit probability claimed: 92% probability of profit
- Theta cited: $20.59/day
- Break-even mentioned:
- Theoretical break-even around ~4675 (subtitle approximation)
- “Max profit”:
- $1,537–$1,538 (premium amount; stays similar if price rises)
- “Max loss”:
- Theoretical tail risk if ES goes to zero
- Presenter’s broker collateral belief: max loss roughly tied to ~$9,400 collateral
- P&L behavior explained:
- Profit fairly stable if price rises and time passes (theta decay)
- Early losses possible if price drops quickly, but can recover by expiration as time decay resumes
-
Put debit spread (“insurance”) example
- Bought option described as “25% probability ITM”
- Sold the other leg 50 points below the bought strike
- Combined payoff described as a “whale-shaped” hump:
- Helps when price drops
- Aims to maintain profit characteristics while extending downside break-even
-
Combined break-even / risk after adding spread
- Downside break-even stated around ~4620–4628
-
Claimed outcome characteristics
- Described as:
- A “bearish trade” that “phenomenally well” in bullish environments
- Generates premium/income if price expires inside the favorable range (premium-based outcome, phrased as making the premium “regardless of how far the market goes up”)
- Described as:
How trades are layered and repeated
-
Execution cadence
- Do one trade every week
-
Scaling via “tranche size”
- If tranche size = 2 → do 2-2-2
- If tranche size = 3 → do 3-3-3
-
Portfolio stacking
- Aim to have ~15 of these trades on
- “Rent and repeat”:
- After closing naked put for profit, open a new one to keep the stack maintained
-
Management timeline
- Naked puts started around 120 days
- Closed around when DTE reaches 30 to 21 days (avoid “gamma risk” in the last ~21 days)
Risk management rules / cautions (step-like)
Naked put management
-
Close naked puts when
- They reach ~95% profit, OR
- Remaining time is ~30 to 21 days (avoid gamma risk)
-
Loss control / allowed stop
- Close at a loss equal to 2x the initial credit received
- Example logic: sold for $1, if it costs $3 to buy back → $2 loss = 2x
- Example cited: close if losses become very large (broker/capital constraints discussed)
- Close at a loss equal to 2x the initial credit received
-
“30 Delta breach” rule
- If the sold put’s delta rises to ~30 Delta or higher (implying much higher probability of finishing ITM):
- either close and accept loss, or
- mark as “Problem Child” and manage with monitoring
- If the sold put’s delta rises to ~30 Delta or higher (implying much higher probability of finishing ITM):
Roll / extend-duration procedure (explicit steps)
When the naked put goes against the position too quickly:
- Close the losing naked put (example described)
- Roll out in time (extend duration)
- Close and reopen when it becomes “worse” (e.g., from ~10 Delta to ~30 Delta)
- Open a new put in a farther expiration (example moves by ~30-day increments)
- Ensure credits cover debits
- Rolling is emphasized as “collects an additional credit,” aiming for credits received ≥ debits paid over the sequence
- Continue rolling if the market keeps moving against
- Example mentions rolling to expirations in a multi-year sequence (e.g., 205, 330, 449, 540 days)
- Critical constraint
- Rolling requires available buying power/cash
- Presenter warns you can’t “sell unlimited notional”
- Temporary losses may occur, so collateral must remain on the sidelines
Disclosures / cautions included in subtitles
- Advises against using retirement money; describes strategy as “fun money”
- Suggests:
- Use about 10% of retirement money
- If matching exists, do employer match / broad index investing (mentions VOO? / “bo” unclear, and SPY as a hold-and-forget S&P 500 idea)
- Add bonds later in retirement (general personal finance guidance)
- No explicit “not financial advice” phrase was observed in the provided subtitles, but there is explicit caution about not using retirement funds.
Tickers / instruments mentioned
- SPY — S&P 500 ETF benchmark
- ES — E-mini S&P 500 futures (main trading instrument shown)
- MES — micro E-mini S&P 500 futures (alternative for smaller accounts)
- No other specific equities/ETFs/bonds/commodities were explicitly named.
Key numbers explicitly cited
-
Account:
- $42,000 starting
- +$3,758 (+8.94%) YTD
- ~3%/month
- Projected ~36% annual
-
SPY levels:
- ~$475 start
- ~$520–$524.7 current
- Claimed ~+9.5%
-
Greeks example:
- Delta 62, Theta 64
- ~$750 in a week → ~$107/day
-
Buying power / exposure:
- Buying power $13,000 (28% of net liq)
- Exposure limit stated as up to 50% (under trend filters)
-
Trade example:
- ES around ~5335
- Naked put strike 4700 (10 Delta)
- Premium received $1,538
- Profit probability claimed 92%
- Daily theta $20.59/day
- Break-even examples shown: ~4675 (naked put) and ~4620–4628 (combined)
-
Management:
- Close at 95% profit or when DTE reaches 30–21 days
- Loss threshold: 2x initial credit
- Roll examples include deltas 10 Delta → 30 Delta and moving to expirations in ~30-day steps
Presenters / sources
- Presenter: Bobby (referenced multiple times)
- Mentioned class/program name: “University of West Georgia class”
- A Zoom link for live trading is referenced, but no external publication/source is named.
Category
Finance
Share this summary
Is the summary off?
If you think the summary is inaccurate, you can reprocess it with the latest model.