Summary of "Harry Deacon | We Should NOT Support No Platforming (2/8) | Oxford Union"

Debate Summary

In this debate at the Oxford Union, Harry Deacon argues against the practice of "no platforming," which involves preventing individuals with controversial views from speaking publicly. He asserts that this practice is dangerous for several reasons:

Encouraging Discourse: Deacon emphasizes that platforms for discussion enable critical discourse, allowing controversial views to be challenged rather than suppressed. He argues that engaging with these views can lead to shifts in public opinion and understanding, using historical examples to illustrate how exposure to debate can change minds.
Trust in Audiences: He criticizes no platforming as patronizing, suggesting it implies that audiences cannot handle provocative ideas. Deacon believes that students and the public should be trusted to engage with different viewpoints and develop their critical thinking skills.
Precedent for Free Speech Limitations: Deacon warns that no platforming sets a dangerous precedent for limiting Free Speech. He argues that once certain views are censored, it opens the door for further restrictions on speech, potentially targeting a wider range of opinions beyond just the controversial.

Deacon concludes by highlighting the historical significance of the Oxford Union as a bastion of Free Speech and encourages members to engage in the conversation rather than shut it down.