Summary of "Про креативы без иллюзий: поиск идей, тесты и производство с AI"
Speakers
- Dima — host, founder of Along.
- Tatyana Shestakova — Head of Creative Production & Marketing Operations at a major Health & Fitness brand; angel investor and advisor in AI/creative startups.
Main themes
- Creative strategy for startups and new apps
- Testing and iteration frameworks (what to test, how many creatives, budgets, cadence)
- AI-assisted production pipelines and tooling
- When to use paid channels vs organic; validating product–market fit with ads
- Creator / UGC vs AI-generated talent debate
- Forecasts for 2026 (agents, personalization, creative roles)
Practical guidelines and workflows
1. Idea discovery / concept sourcing
- Do social research: Reddit, TikTok, X, forums, search trends (Google/other engines) to learn language, pain points, and search volume.
- Dissect competitors’ creatives — identify messages, visuals, and iterations they made; do not copy 1:1.
- Build a reference library (Figma, Notion, FeedBoard or similar) to collect organic content, inspiration, and reusable components.
- Combine disparate inspirations (like LEGO): mix visuals, copy and formats to create fresh concepts.
- Revisit old formats/cyclical trends — some ad styles resurface successfully.
2. Testing approach, volumes, and budgets
- Start with 5–6 different concepts; if constrained, a minimum of 3.
- For each concept create ~3–5 variations.
- Let the platform (e.g., Meta) prioritize creatives within concept bundles to surface winners.
- Budget guidance:
- $50–$100 per creative minimum for proper testing.
- $10k+ total testing budget gives more reliable early signals.
- Cadence and expectations:
- Weekly testing cycles if budget allows.
- Aim for ~20% of tests to “pass” (show promise); keep 2–3% as full winners for scale.
- Keep creative testing spend a small share of campaign spend: ~10% advisable; 20–30% acceptable early.
3. Iteration playbook (what to change first)
- Minimize variables when iterating: change messaging while keeping visuals constant (or change visuals and keep messaging) to isolate drivers.
- After isolating the working element, iterate on identity, voice, early seconds (first 3s), or add avatars/social hooks.
- Avoid trivial changes (e.g., button color) — they rarely move the needle under modern platform algorithms.
- Document the process: idea → test → iterate → document → new batch.
4. Production automation (AI-assisted pipelines)
- Rule of thumb: automate mass iterations and pre-processing; human assembly/refinement remains needed for high quality.
- Typical pipeline:
- Generate references.
- Batch-generate visuals/videos via multiple models.
- Pre-process outputs.
- Human edit/assemble final creatives (editors or tools like CapCut).
- Tools and roles mentioned (names may differ in transcripts):
- Wavy UI / VUI — pipeline orchestration & multi-model generation.
- “Nanban” / “Nanbanana” — identity/visual generation models.
- Hicksfield — platforms for combining models, creating avatars and motion control.
- Video SDKs / agents — generate video creatives; some offer SDKs for integration.
- Perplexity — trend/semantic parsing and social research automation.
- FeedBoard — store organic video/static inspiration.
- Figma, Notion — shared knowledge base and reference libraries.
- CapCut — editing.
- Use good prompts to produce many visual variants quickly; reserve humans for final curation.
5. Creators: AI-generated vs real people
- Performance depends more on message, relevance, format, and targeting than on whether talent is AI or human.
- Use AI for low-cost identity/appearance testing; once a winning persona is found, hire real creators (UGC) to match that profile for authenticity and scale.
- Expect a resurgence of handcrafted UGC and mixed-media aesthetics — human authenticity will be valued.
- In identity-sensitive verticals (e.g., health & fitness), matching model to audience (race, gender, age, body type) matters a lot.
6. Channels, policy, and creative differences
- Google / YouTube Shorts: prefer voiceover, subtitles, product demos; users expect human/demo elements.
- TikTok: organic style, platform-specific patterns; reach is unpredictable and often delivers lower long-term conversion/subscription quality.
- Meta: more systematizable (audience optimization); creative diversity is key to resilience.
- Always check platform policies (especially for health and fintech) to avoid disapprovals or account action.
- Organic “TikTok farms” can drive reach and installs but often produce low-quality traffic, refunds, or App Store penalties — treat organic viral tactics as experimental supplements, not replacements for controlled paid testing.
7. Validating demand & MVP approach
- Test demand with ads driving to funnels (web funnels, one-page sites, Stripe checkout, analytics) — no need for fake App Store pages.
- Use no-code / rapid builds to create fast MVPs and test conversion before building full product.
- Use top-of-funnel metrics and funnel completion events to decide whether to invest in product development.
- Be mindful of fraud, refunds and platform responses if traffic quality is poor.
8. Risks and operational notes
- Intellectual property: direct copying of competitor creatives can trigger complaints, suspensions or bans. Avoid copying 1:1.
- Negotiate with creators; don’t accept first quoted price.
- Store and document everything: playbooks, test results, creative knowledge base.
- Expect winners to burn out (creative fatigue) — continuous iteration is necessary.
Forecasts & strategic outlook for 2026
- More AI agents will manage production and performance marketing; creative marketers who orchestrate agents will be core roles.
- Production costs will continue to fall, enabling more tests and deeper personalization at scale.
- Personalization and identity-driven creatives will become more important — expect more AI-driven avatar/identity testing plus selective humanization (UGC).
- Growth of creative automation & SDKs that can produce entire video creatives on demand; human curation and quality control remain critical.
Actionable guides / how-to items
- Competitor creative dissection: study message, visual, iterations; use competitor language but create distinct visuals.
- Test matrix template: 3–6 concepts × 3–5 variations per concept; weekly cycles; $50–$100 per creative minimum.
- Iteration playbook: isolate variable (message vs visual) → iterate identity → add social hook / first 3s tweak → document.
- Automated creative pipeline: scrape references (Perplexity / subreddit parsing) → generate variations (multi-model pipeline) → human edit/assemble → upload.
- MVP validation via ads: run ads to web funnels / one-pagers, track funnel metrics, then build product if signals are positive.
Key practical numbers / benchmarks
- Concepts to start: 5–6 (minimum 3 if constrained).
- Variations per concept: 3–5.
- Spend per creative test: $50–$100 minimum; $100+ recommended when scaling winners.
- Expected pass rate: ~20% showing promise; 2–3% scalable winners.
- Creative testing budget as % of campaign budget: start ~10%; 20–30% acceptable early.
Final practical tips
- Don’t copy creatives 1:1; dissect and speak the user’s language.
- Store references centrally (Figma / Notion / FeedBoard) and formalize a playbook.
- Use AI to accelerate iterations and test identities; convert best-performing AI personas to real creators for authenticity.
- Prefer controlled paid experiments (Meta, Google Search/YouTube, ASO) for reliable validation; use TikTok/organic as supplementary channels but expect lower-quality conversions.
- Protect against IP risk and negotiate with creators.
Sources / main speakers
- Dima — host, founder of Along.
- Tatyana Shestakova — Head of Creative Production & Marketing Operations (major Health & Fitness brand); angel investor and advisor.
Category
Technology
Share this summary
Is the summary off?
If you think the summary is inaccurate, you can reprocess it with the latest model.
Preparing reprocess...