Summary of "Стратегии англосферы в условиях кризиса меняющегося миропорядка | Олег Яновский"

Analysis of the Anglosphere’s Strategic Adaptations

Presented by Oleg Yanovsky (MGIMO)

The video features Oleg Yanovsky from MGIMO presenting an analysis of the Anglosphere’s strategic adaptations amid the ongoing crisis and transformation of the global order, focusing primarily on Great Britain’s evolving role and strategy in 2025-2026.

Key Themes and Concepts

Yanovsky highlights several emerging concepts shaping the near future (2026):

Conceptual Frameworks: Three key terms define current trends:
- Geoeconomics
- Gray zone conflicts
- Defense of technology (referred to as venture militarization)

These reflect ongoing developments in logistics, autarky, sabotage, and the rise of large-scale projects in space, the Arctic, and technology—likened to a “Manhattan Project 2.0” involving AI and advanced tech.

Monroe Doctrine Revisited: Contemporary US and UK strategic thinking about zones of interest has shifted away from traditional territorial concepts. Instead, it focuses on a broad spectrum of resources—material, network, spatial, and technological. While the Monroe Doctrine is rhetorically invoked, it does not fully explain current policies.

Great Britain’s Strategic Transformation

Decline of the State Model: Britain no longer functions as a traditional state with vertical power structures. Power is now exercised horizontally through a network of politicians, bureaucrats, intelligence agencies, aristocratic families, and financial elites centered around the City of London.
Erosion of State Institutions: Formal state institutions are deliberately weakened or dismantled, replaced by non-state forms of power and institutional networks. This represents a return to a pre-modern governance model focused on survival and adaptation rather than conventional statehood.
British Power Network: The so-called “Executive Core” governs through an informal network combining political, intelligence, economic, and aristocratic actors. The City of London operates as an offshore financial hub, sustaining this network by servicing debt and avoiding traditional production or population engagement.

Ukraine as a Strategic Hub

Ukraine is not a geopolitical priority in itself but serves as a central operational hub for the British-American alliance’s transnational network.
The conflict is used to justify institutional reorganization, militarization, and long-term confrontation strategies.
Britain has shifted from a “global Britain” risk management approach to preparing for high-intensity conflict, using war as a catalyst for institutional and budgetary mobilization.
The UK leads NATO coordination in northern and eastern Europe, patronizing northern Eastern Europe despite financial constraints, relying heavily on organizational resources.
The UK has institutionalized indefinite financial support for Ukraine, committing £3 billion annually, signaling a long-term engagement.

Militarization and Intelligence

New intelligence and counterintelligence structures are emerging in the UK, including:
- A unified military intelligence service
- A military counterintelligence agency (a novel development)
Russia is explicitly identified as a permanent threat and primary intelligence target, repeatedly mentioned in official strategic documents.
MI5 now prioritizes counterintelligence against Russia and even the US, marking a shift away from terrorism and migration as primary concerns.
Britain’s military reserves increasingly consist of top corporate and technology specialists integrated into military intelligence roles, indicating a focus on hybrid warfare and long-term covert operations.

Financial and Industrial Integration

The City of London has ceased to be a neutral financial center and is now integrated into the national security architecture, focusing on defense and resilience through venture capital and high-tech investments.
The creation of the Defence and Resilience Group within City UK represents a coalition of banks, insurers, and defense contractors aiming to:
- Unlock private capital for defense
- Reduce regulatory barriers
- Expand defense exports (targeting $10 billion)
British defense procurement increasingly involves American tech companies such as Palantir and Anduril, with the UK serving as a gateway for these firms into Europe and Ukraine.
The financial bloc plays a central role in sustaining militarization and strategic reorientation.

Arctic and Northern Europe

The UK leads the Joint Expeditionary Force, coordinating military and sabotage activities in the Arctic and northern Europe.
Efforts focus on protecting critical digital infrastructure, such as undersea cables.
Preventive measures aim to limit Russian presence and influence in the Arctic and surrounding regions.

UK-US Relations

The “special relationship” is characterized as transactional and somewhat subordinate:
- The US provides funding
- The UK exploits these resources for its strategic interests
Despite occasional US disillusionment with British actions, the US remains reliant on the UK to manage European and Middle Eastern commitments.

Conclusion

Yanovsky’s report outlines a comprehensive view of the Anglosphere’s strategic recalibration centered on:

Britain’s transformation into a networked power structure focused on long-term confrontation with Russia
Institutional militarization and integration of financial and technological sectors into defense
Ukraine as a pivotal operational hub
The Arctic and northern Europe as emerging strategic theaters
A persistent but complex and transactional UK-US alliance