Video summary

How to Trade the 111 Strategy - Complete Guide to the 111 Trade

Main summary

Key takeaways

Finance

Overview: The “111 Strategy” (Original Gangster / OG)

The video explains the “111 strategy” (also called the Original Gangster / OG trade), an options-based, systematic income + semi-hedge strategy. The payoff is built around:

  • A put debit spread (long put spread)
  • A further-out short put to shape a defined upside/downside profile

The speaker emphasizes:

  • Mechanical rules
  • Limited monitoring
  • Portfolio and risk sizing

Instruments / Underlyings Mentioned

Options / indices / ETFs / futures

  • SPX (S&P 500 index)
  • SPY (S&P 500 ETF)
  • ES (E-mini S&P 500 futures)
  • MES (Micro E-mini S&P 500 futures)
  • QQQ (Nasdaq 100 ETF)
  • Futures mentioned generally (besides ES/MES)
  • Oil (used as an example for a futures version)

Single-name tech examples (as illustrations)

  • Amazon (AMZN)
  • Tesla (TSLA)
  • Microsoft (MSFT)
  • Google / Alphabet (GOOG)

Core Payoff Construction (How the “111 Trade” Works)

The strategy combines three elements:

  1. Buy an out-of-the-money put debit spread
  2. Sell an additional farther-out out-of-the-money put
  3. Choose strikes so that the sold put premium finances the debit spread, resulting in a defined net payoff (often framed as net credit overall)

Purpose

  • Primarily income generation via option premium
  • Acts as a “semi-hedge” (not a full hedge), because in the “trap” scenario the trade can profit more than the initial credit.
  • If price falls far enough, assignment risk may cause you to buy the underlying at a discount, framed as a wheeling / owning-stock pathway.

Methodology: Step-by-Step Framework

As presented:

  1. Select underlying

    • The speaker prefers large index/futures: SPX/ES/SPY/MES/QQQ.
  2. Choose days to expiration (DTE)

    • Typically 45–60 DTE
    • Speaker preference: around ~60 DTE
    • Original version used: around ~45 DTE
  3. Build the put debit spread

    • Use out-of-the-money strikes
    • (Width/debit examples appear below.)
  4. Finance with a farther OTM short put

    • The sold put strike is far enough OTM that the premium helps achieve:
      • positive net credit overall
      • a “trap” zone where maximum profit becomes possible
  5. Manage exits mechanically

    • Stop loss at ~1× max profit (described as “One X the max profit”)
    • Assignment / wheeling is treated as an alternative planned outcome
    • Exit guidance depends on whether price is in:
      • tail
      • trap
      • or beyond a “point of no return” (far-risk area)
  6. Portfolio and risk sizing rules

    • Risk ≤ 2% of portfolio value per trade
    • Allocation ≤ 30% of total portfolio to this strategy (or any one strategy)

Key Targets, Ratios, and Performance Claims

Return & timeframe goals

  • Stated goal: ~6% monthly incoming roughly every ~60 days
  • Re-stated: “three percent a month”
  • Framed annualized: ~36% per year
  • DTE references:
    • 45 DTE used in some calculations/examples
    • 60–65 days referenced in rationale (and in oil examples)

“Tail” vs “Trap” Outcomes (Profit Multipliers)

The strategy can profit in two main ways:

  1. Tail

    • Options expire worthless
    • You keep the initial credit
  2. Trap

    • Price moves into the region associated with the spread
    • You reach maximum profit

How max profit is framed

  • Trap max profit includes:
    • Keeping the initial credit
    • Capturing the width of the debit spread
  • Speaker claims potential “four times or more” the initial credit (depends on setup)

Numeric Examples (As Given)

Example A: ES (futures) illustrative trade math

Structure example

  • Debit spread: 4310 / 4260
    • About ~50 wide
    • About ~$10 debit
  • Short put farther OTM (financing credit)
    • Example around ~4110–4150
    • So net credit is ~$10

Multipliers / dollars

  • Tail profit: stated as ~$500 on a ~$10 credit
    • Using ES 50 multiplier
  • Trap max profit: stated as:
    • Debit width ($50) × multiplier (200 mentioned) + $500
    • Total: $3000 max profit
  • Max loss: also described as $3000 (defined-risk framing)

Buying power / risk sizing

  • Example buying power: ~$6400
  • If it expires in tail: described as about ~8% in 45 DTE

Assignment / “point of no return” concern

  • Example concern passing a level around ~4100
  • Mentioned as roughly ~300 points drop (example context: market near ~4400)
  • Speaker emphasizes a slow decline is desired to “build” the trap gradually.

Example B: SPY (ETF) performance framing

  • Similar structure on SPY
  • Described as less attractive, mainly due to buying power/return differences
  • Rough estimate mentioned:
    • About ~2% return on buying power over ~45 days
    • Earlier mention: around ~1.5%
  • Not framed as “fantastic” versus futures.

Example C: “Optimal 111” strike selection heuristic

A claimed “optimal” configuration:

  • Put debit spread width: 25–30 points
  • Debit / spread cost: ~$6
  • Short put credit: ~$11 (farther OTM)
  • DTE comparison:
    • “Closer to 60 days” vs “30 wide” notes
    • Speaker suggests 60 DTE helps reduce gamma effects and improves safety/credit while keeping ROI similar
  • Historical claim:
    • No losing trades in 2020–2021 using this method
    • Then moved to 112 in 2022

Example D: TSLA options strike example

Speaker describes a thinner version on TSLA:

  • Debit spread: buy/sell around ~210 / 205
    • About ~$1
  • Sell farther put around ~180
    • About ~$2

Approximate results:

  • ~$130 winner
  • Margin roughly ~$5300
  • ~2.5% return in ~60 days

Notes on outcome framing:

  • If TSLA drops into trap range, you could effectively “buy at a discount” (assignment framed positively)
  • If it stays up, you take smaller tail profit.

Example E: Oil (futures) with explicit ROI framing

Illustrative oil setup:

  • “Safety” zone around $60
  • Tail:
    • Winner: ~$350
    • Tail return: ~8% in ~65 days if oil stays higher / moves higher
  • Trap:
    • If oil drops into trap:
      • “Dead in the middle of the trap” yields about ~$2350 on ~$4700 margin
      • Claimed as ~50% return

Greeks / Risk Notes Emphasized

  • Delta

    • Starts slightly positive
    • If underlying rises, delta can become more negative (speaker says this can still be favorable)
  • Theta

    • Positive theta initially
    • Time decay benefits as the short puts lose value
  • Vega

    • If implied volatility rises significantly, put prices increase
    • Speaker notes it’s not helpful; you should be aware
  • Gamma

    • If underlying rises, delta falls quicker (good)
    • If underlying drops, delta can increase quickly (could be bad)

Disclosures / Cautions

  • No explicit “not financial advice” disclaimer appears in the provided subtitles.
  • However, the speaker repeatedly stresses:
    • Mechanical rules
    • Defined max loss and stop-loss logic
    • Sizing constraints:
      • ≤ 2% risk per trade
      • ≤ 30% allocation
    • Assignment risk if the market drops far enough

Key Recommendations / Explicit Actions

  • Prefer large underlyings (index futures like ES/MES) for stronger economics
  • Use around ~60 DTE (or original ~45 DTE)
  • Tune strikes to create:
    • a tail where you keep credit
    • a trap where you can reach max profit
  • Apply strict sizing:
    • Risk ≤ 2% per trade
    • ≤ 30% portfolio allocation to this strategy
  • Manage exits mechanically:
    • stop-loss relative to max profit
    • treat assignment as part of the plan (wheel/owning underlying)

Presenter / Source

  • Subtitles appear to come from a single presenter (name not shown).
  • Source referenced: “How to Trade the 111 Strategy - Complete Guide to the 111 Trade” (channel name not specified in the excerpt).

Rate this summary

Your feedback will help improve summaries.

Improve this summary

Reprocess with a stronger model when the summary feels incomplete or inaccurate.

Pro

Translate summary in another language

Pro

Ask questions to this video

Chat for follow-up questions, clarifications, and source-backed answers.

Coming soon

Share this summary

Original video