FILM TERBAIK & TERSAMPAH DI 2025 | Podcast Ngelantur Bareng Ep. 1

Quick recap — Ngelantur Bareng Ep. 1

A lively, messy, and funny pilot from the new Bin Sky Studio. Timo (host) launches the channel, assembles a ragtag crew, and they spend most of the episode arguing about the best and most disappointing films of 2025 — all while weathering classic live-show chaos.

What the episode is about

• Timo opens the new podcast channel and introduces the crew (jokingly called the “Four Horseman”).
• The group celebrates their new filming space, Bin Sky Studio in Kemang.
• Classic live-show mishaps occur: a thumbnail typo and 20 minutes of audio that didn’t record — which leads to on-air improvisation and laughter.
• The main focus is a spirited debate about notable films of 2025: favourites, surprises, and big letdowns.

Highlights, jokes, and standout moments

• The introductions become a running gag: a recruitment skit, the “Four Horseman” nickname, teasing about who’s a weeb, and playful descriptions of each member’s style (hoodies, used laptops, masks).
• Studio shoutout: Bin Sky Studio presented as a new cultural hangout and a point of pride for the crew.
• Technical comedy: jokes about the thumbnail typo and losing 20 minutes of audio — then celebration of improvising through the mess.
• Genre/awards hot takes: a lively conversation about how awards (Oscars) treat international films and accusations that Hollywood can snub Asian titles.
• Horror breakdown: a major disagreement between visual/visceral horror and editing/sound-driven horror. The film “Weapons” (as referenced in chat) is praised for using sound and editing over cheap jump-scares.
• Comedy and banter dotted through the critique segments — e.g., jokes about mothers, truck crashes, and “Galactus being pranked.”

“Four Horseman” — a recurring joke that captures the show’s playful, chaotic energy.

Notable film discussions

• Horror
  • Split between fans of visual, visceral horror and supporters of sound/editing-driven scares.
  • Praise for smart use of long takes and dream-logic pacing; some hosts remain divided over effectiveness.
• Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein
  • Admired for its humanist take and poetic approach to the monster.
  • Some felt Victor’s arc and pacing left them emotionally distant — good craft but uneven connection.
• Local Indonesian film (referred to as “Gema” / social-media attention story)
  • Praised for its cringe-addiction depiction and bittersweet tone.
  • Criticized for a convenient climax and resolution driven by a mother’s intervention rather than the protagonist’s personal growth.
• “28 Years Later” (as discussed)
  • Lauded for bold genre-swapping, an unsettling cult twist, and audacious tonal shifts — hosts enjoyed the absurdity and commitment.

Biggest disappointments of 2025 (as called out)

• Tron-style sequel (referred to as “Tron Ares”): called bland or ugly by some hosts.
• Jurassic World Reborn: accused of milking the franchise, weird creature design, heavy product placement, and failing to deliver the promised hook.
• Fantastic Four (MCU entry): split reactions — trailers promised retro-futuristic scale, but many felt the film landed as lightweight family drama with a disappointing payoff (Galactus in particular).

Ratings, wrap, and next steps

• Each host rounds up personal “best of 2025” picks and lists of most disappointing films (answers vary).
• The episode ends teasing future segments where hosts will compete over who has the most “sinful” taste in movies.

Tone and energy

Casual, chaotic, and full of banter — the episode mixes genuine film-nerd analysis (cinematography, sound design, symbolism) with irreverent jokes and on-air pratfalls. Energetic and promising as a noisy, fun pilot.

People in the episode

• Timo TVO (host, Ngelantur Indonesia)
• Rendra / Rendavers
• Ziza (Zizaren)
• Hasan (“Hasan is cooking” — the youngest, self-described weeb)

That’s the gist — a noisy, fun pilot full of hot takes, studio pride, and promise for more movie rambling ahead.