Summary of "FILM TERBAIK & TERSAMPAH DI 2025 | Podcast Ngelantur Bareng Ep. 1"

Quick recap — Ngelantur Bareng Ep. 1

A lively, messy, and funny pilot from the new Bin Sky Studio. Timo (host) launches the channel, assembles a ragtag crew, and they spend most of the episode arguing about the best and most disappointing films of 2025 — all while weathering classic live-show chaos.

What the episode is about

Timo opens the new podcast channel and introduces the crew (jokingly called the “Four Horseman”).
The group celebrates their new filming space, Bin Sky Studio in Kemang.
Classic live-show mishaps occur: a thumbnail typo and 20 minutes of audio that didn’t record — which leads to on-air improvisation and laughter.
The main focus is a spirited debate about notable films of 2025: favourites, surprises, and big letdowns.

Highlights, jokes, and standout moments

The introductions become a running gag: a recruitment skit, the “Four Horseman” nickname, teasing about who’s a weeb, and playful descriptions of each member’s style (hoodies, used laptops, masks).
Studio shoutout: Bin Sky Studio presented as a new cultural hangout and a point of pride for the crew.
Technical comedy: jokes about the thumbnail typo and losing 20 minutes of audio — then celebration of improvising through the mess.
Genre/awards hot takes: a lively conversation about how awards (Oscars) treat international films and accusations that Hollywood can snub Asian titles.
Horror breakdown: a major disagreement between visual/visceral horror and editing/sound-driven horror. The film “Weapons” (as referenced in chat) is praised for using sound and editing over cheap jump-scares.
Comedy and banter dotted through the critique segments — e.g., jokes about mothers, truck crashes, and “Galactus being pranked.”

“Four Horseman” — a recurring joke that captures the show’s playful, chaotic energy.

Notable film discussions

Horror
- Split between fans of visual, visceral horror and supporters of sound/editing-driven scares.
- Praise for smart use of long takes and dream-logic pacing; some hosts remain divided over effectiveness.
Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein
- Admired for its humanist take and poetic approach to the monster.
- Some felt Victor’s arc and pacing left them emotionally distant — good craft but uneven connection.
Local Indonesian film (referred to as “Gema” / social-media attention story)
- Praised for its cringe-addiction depiction and bittersweet tone.
- Criticized for a convenient climax and resolution driven by a mother’s intervention rather than the protagonist’s personal growth.
“28 Years Later” (as discussed)
- Lauded for bold genre-swapping, an unsettling cult twist, and audacious tonal shifts — hosts enjoyed the absurdity and commitment.

Biggest disappointments of 2025 (as called out)

Tron-style sequel (referred to as “Tron Ares”): called bland or ugly by some hosts.
Jurassic World Reborn: accused of milking the franchise, weird creature design, heavy product placement, and failing to deliver the promised hook.
Fantastic Four (MCU entry): split reactions — trailers promised retro-futuristic scale, but many felt the film landed as lightweight family drama with a disappointing payoff (Galactus in particular).

Ratings, wrap, and next steps

Each host rounds up personal “best of 2025” picks and lists of most disappointing films (answers vary).
The episode ends teasing future segments where hosts will compete over who has the most “sinful” taste in movies.

Tone and energy

Casual, chaotic, and full of banter — the episode mixes genuine film-nerd analysis (cinematography, sound design, symbolism) with irreverent jokes and on-air pratfalls. Energetic and promising as a noisy, fun pilot.