Video Summary - พัดลม 2 ชั้น 7 ใบพัด Xiaomi Fan 2 มันเทพและล้ำกว่าปกติยังไง?

Product Being Reviewed

Xiaomi “Fan 2” (2 ชั้น / 7 ใบพัด) with a double-layer blade design (7-blade outer layer, inner reduced to 5 blades). The stand has adjustable height for indoor use, using UV-resistant ABS material (claimed).

Key Features Mentioned

Double-layer blade design

Not two separate propellers, but a 2-layered blade structure:
- Outer layer: 7 blades
- Inner layer: reduced to 5 blades
The design is claimed to influence air expelled / airflow behavior compared to a normal blade arrangement.

Build / materials

Made with ABS plastic
UV resistant (color should not fade easily)
Doesn’t yellow easily (per Xiaomi claims)

Height & positioning

Adjustable height with two fixed positions: 64 cm and 100 cm
Tilt / rotation and cable neck:
- Tilt range mentioned around 30° to 140° (manual/pivot adjustment)
- Cable/neck rotation up to 140°
App-enabled angle adjustment:
- Can turn on automatically when configured (via app)

Control & automation

4 physical buttons:
- Power
- Mode switching
- Intensity adjustment
- Timer / indicator-related controls
Mi Home app compatibility, enabling:
- On/off
- Speed/intensity
- Timer
- Angle control
- Indicator light off
Intensity levels: up to 100 levels (via app)

Wind modes

Direct Beat: steady airflow
Natural Beach: simulated natural variation (alternating gentle/intense)

Timer

Auto-off timer: 2–8 hours

Motor / efficiency

Uses an inverter motor (described as very small)
Efficiency claim mentioned: fan may last up to a maximum of 15 days (as described in subtitles)

User Experience / Performance Results (vs Hatari)

Airflow / wind speed test

Xiaomi:
- At 1 meter: ~2.7 m/s
- At 3 meters: ~1.0 m/s
Hatari (comparison fan):
- At 1 meter: over 3 m/s
- At 3 meters: ~1.4 m/s
Narrator takeaway: the Xiaomi fan feels more comfortable at the test spot, attributed to airflow distribution/volume differences (not speed alone).

Power consumption (electricity cost estimate)

Xiaomi:
- Strongest “normal mode” at level 4: ~12 W per hour
- Estimated cost: ~1.20 baht/day
Hatari:
- Highest setting at level 3: ~54 W
- Estimated cost: ~6 baht/day
Conclusion: Xiaomi is significantly more energy-efficient in the described test.

Noise level

Xiaomi: ~55 dB
Hatari: ~57 dB
Difference is small, though the narrator suggests Xiaomi feels slightly quieter.

Oscillation / direction / coverage

From overhead comparison:
- Xiaomi shows a wider angle / insertion coverage than Hatari.

Pros Mentioned

Very quiet / barely audible motor (good for sleeping)
Energy efficient (lower wattage and lower estimated daily cost)
Smart control via Mi Home app
- Up to 100 levels, angle and timer
- Can turn indicator light off
Minimalist aesthetic (white design looks good in a room)
Wider airflow angle than the compared Hatari (based on overhead view)

Cons Mentioned / Concerns

Airflow may not feel as “powerful at distance” as Hatari:
- Hatari performs better at 3 meters in the measured numbers.
“100-level” speed adjustment is hard to notice:
- Differences feel indistinguishable when settings are very close.
Height adjustment limitation:
- Xiaomi offers only two fixed heights (64 cm / 1 m) compared to Hatari’s more flexible adjustment.
Price concern:
- Not clearly listed in the subtitle “menu”
- Described range: over 2,000 baht to nearly 3,000 baht
- Narrator compares it to other cheaper fans (including a Hatari model under 1,000 baht mentioned)

Verdict / Recommendation (Concise)

Recommended for users who prioritize:

Quiet operation
Lower electricity use
Smart app control

If your priority is stronger high-distance airflow, the compared Hatari performed better at 3 meters, so Xiaomi may be less ideal for that specific use case—though it still delivers a more comfortable airflow feel according to the narrator.

Unique Points List (Distinct Mentions)

Xiaomi “Fan 2” reviewed with double-layer 7-blade design
Clarification: not two propellers, but 2-layer blade structure (outer 7, inner 5)
Airflow expelled differs vs normal fan blade arrangement
Fan weight about 3.2 kg (light/easy to move)
Indoor use mentioned; outdoor suitability depends on UV resistance
Material: ABS plastic, UV resistant, doesn’t yellow easily
Minimalist white design praised
Height: two fixed heights (64 cm and 1 m)
Angle adjustment described (tilt/cable rotation up to 140°, narrow to wide around 30–140°)
Physical control: 4 buttons
Mi Home app compatibility required/central to advanced functions
App features: on/off, speed up to 100 levels, timer, angle control, indicator light off
Timer: 2–8 hours
Wind modes: Direct Beat and Natural Beach
“100-level” differences are hard to feel in practice
Motion/angle control: fan can turn on automatically when app sets angle (and turn off when precise set is needed)
Test vs Hatari at 1 m and 3 m
Comfort comparison: Xiaomi feels more comfortable at the narrator’s spot
Power comparison: 12 W (Xiaomi) vs 54 W (Hatari)
Estimated daily cost: ~1.20 baht/day (Xiaomi) vs ~6 baht/day (Hatari)
Noise: 55 dB (Xiaomi) vs 57 dB (Hatari)
Blade coverage: Xiaomi has a wider angle than Hatari
Sleep suitability emphasized due to low noise/motor sound
Price concerns: ~2,000–3,000 baht and possibly higher than competitors (including a Hatari under 1,000 baht mentioned)
Overall: Xiaomi is good, but requires careful consideration mainly due to price and distance airflow preference

Speakers / Views Mentioned

A single primary reviewer/narrator throughout (no clearly separate speakers in the subtitles).
The narrator repeatedly compared Xiaomi vs Hatari for:
- Wind speed
- Comfort
- Electricity cost
- Noise
- Adjustability
- Oscillation coverage

พัดลม 2 ชั้น 7 ใบพัด Xiaomi Fan 2 มันเทพและล้ำกว่าปกติยังไง? | ลองให้

Key takeaways