Summary of "Nationalism vs Globalism | Full Debate | Yassmin Abdel-Magied, Homi Bhabha, David Miller"
The debate focuses on the tension between nationalism and globalism, exploring the human inclination towards tribalism and its implications in contemporary society. The discussion begins with the premise that humans have a natural tendency to form strong attachments to their immediate communities or tribes, which raises the question of whether such tribal allegiances are beneficial or detrimental.
David Miller, a political theorist, argues that tribalism is a fundamental aspect of human nature, suggesting that it provides individuals with a larger narrative to contextualize their lives and a sense of recognition from their peers. He acknowledges the potential for inter-tribal conflict, emphasizing the importance of creating inclusive identities that allow diverse groups to coexist peacefully. Miller identifies himself as a "liberal nationalist," advocating for nation-building as a constructive response to the innate human need for belonging.
Homi Bhabha challenges the simplistic view of tribalism, highlighting the complexity of human identities and the emotional ties people have to their nations and communities. He critiques the notion of universal humanity, arguing that it often emerges post-persecution and is insufficient in addressing the nuances of modern identity. Bhabha warns against the rise of "tribal nationalism," drawing parallels to historical moments of mass migration and conflict, and stresses the importance of recognizing how nationalism can manifest through race, gender, and other social divisions.
Bhabha concludes with a poignant reference to W.H. Auden's poem, which reflects on the dynamics of oppression and survival, underscoring the complexities of identity and the dangers of nationalist rhetoric.
Presenters/Contributors:
- Yassmin Abdel-Magied
- Homi Bhabha
- David Miller
Category
News and Commentary
