Video summary

I Built an Indicator That Finds Supply & Demand Zones Automatically (Here's What Happened)

Main summary

Key takeaways

Technology

Summary of the Video (Subtitles-Based)

The creator presents a TradingView indicator designed to automatically find supply & demand zones—including how to trade from them—so traders don’t have to spend a long time drawing zones manually. They claim the indicator identifies zones in seconds and supports a consistent ruleset intended to improve trade outcomes.

Key Problem With Manual Zoning (Their Critique)

  • Manually drawing zones can take 20–30 minutes.
  • It’s “not even right half the time” because it’s unclear which liquidity/supply-demand area to mark.
  • Inconsistency is emphasized: drawing different zones at different times means you can’t reliably reproduce results.
  • They argue that consistent zone rules are what separates profitable trading from non-profitable trading.

Trading Framework They Use (Multi-Timeframe Workflow)

1) Determine Trend and Range on Higher Timeframes

  • For day trading, they prefer 5/10/15-minute charts.
  • For swing trading, they say it can apply similarly to 1H / 4H / Daily.
  • They describe bullish structure as:
    • Higher lows
    • Higher highs
    • Including a protected low and a high

2) Use the Indicator to Identify POI Zones Between the Range

  • The indicator places zones between the low and high boundaries.
  • They recommend enabling settings that control setup direction:
    • Turn off bearish setups in bullish conditions (to avoid “cooked” entries)
    • Use the opposite direction when bearish

3) Six-Tap Model for Zone Quality

  • They claim the best zones follow a “six-tap model” (taps labeled 1–6).
  • They define zones as “unmitigated”:
    • Where 50% has not been traded back into
    • (They reference a 50% dashed line.)
  • They treat POIs as valid when price shows the expected liquidity interaction:
    • Wait for the liquidity sweep (labeled as “number 4”)
    • Then aim for rejection around 50% of the zone (or close to it)

4) Confirm on a Lower Timeframe (Avoid Blind Entries)

After identifying the POI on the higher timeframe:

  • Drop down to a lower timeframe (often 1-minute).
  • Require a shift in structure (confirmation), such as a close above/below a key level.
  • Only enter if the confirmation occurs within the printed zone.
  • If price breaks through the zone without structural confirmation:
    • They don’t take the trade, framing it as avoiding losses from missing confirmation.

Indicator Usage / Configuration Notes

  • In TradingView, they enter the indicator via Indicators.
  • They mention an “AMN model” and instruct toggling:
    • “Bullish only” or “Bearish only” depending on trend
  • They recommend a balanced approach:
    • On 1–5 minute ranges, more zones appear (more setups) but potentially lower quality.
    • They prefer fewer, higher-confidence setups for a higher win rate (they claim a “crazy high” win rate).

Two Real-Trade Examples (What They Demonstrate)

Example 1: Bullish Buy Scenario

  • The indicator marks a demand zone between the higher-timeframe low/high.
  • They wait for a liquidity sweep, then look for price to reach ~50% of the zone.
  • On the lower timeframe, they wait for a structure shift (example: a close above a prior high).
  • Then they set:
    • Entry at the confirmation location
    • Stop loss below the zone low
    • Target at the higher-timeframe higher high
  • They claim the trade hits take profit.

Example 2: Bearish Short Scenario

  • Structure indicates lower highs / lower lows.
  • The indicator provides multiple zones, but they ignore the higher zone if it conflicts with the trend.
  • They use the same six-tap / 50% POI logic:
    • Require a sweep into/near 50%
    • Require a lower-timeframe structure shift confirming downside (e.g., a candle close below a key level)
  • If the shift doesn’t happen before price breaks through the zone, they won’t trade.
  • They place:
    • A stop above the zone
    • A target down to the expected low
  • They claim it also reaches the target.

Purchase / Access Notes

  • The indicator costs money.
  • Access is provided via a link in the video description.
  • After purchase, they ask buyers to send their TradingView username through WhatsApp support chat or Discord, specifically to “the real me” as an anti-scam step.

Main Speakers / Sources

  • Primary speaker: The video’s creator/trader (no named guest in the subtitles).
  • Sources referenced: TradingView, and the creator’s paid supply/demand indicator (including an “AMN model” setting).

Rate this summary

Your feedback will help improve summaries.

Improve this summary

Reprocess with a stronger model when the summary feels incomplete or inaccurate.

Pro

Translate summary in another language

Pro

Ask questions to this video

Chat for follow-up questions, clarifications, and source-backed answers.

Coming soon

Share this summary

Original video