Summary of "I Built an Indicator That Finds Supply & Demand Zones Automatically (Here's What Happened)"

Summary of the Video (Subtitles-Based)

The creator presents a TradingView indicator designed to automatically find supply & demand zones—including how to trade from them—so traders don’t have to spend a long time drawing zones manually. They claim the indicator identifies zones in seconds and supports a consistent ruleset intended to improve trade outcomes.

Key Problem With Manual Zoning (Their Critique)

Manually drawing zones can take 20–30 minutes.
It’s “not even right half the time” because it’s unclear which liquidity/supply-demand area to mark.
Inconsistency is emphasized: drawing different zones at different times means you can’t reliably reproduce results.
They argue that consistent zone rules are what separates profitable trading from non-profitable trading.

Trading Framework They Use (Multi-Timeframe Workflow)

1) Determine Trend and Range on Higher Timeframes

For day trading, they prefer 5/10/15-minute charts.
For swing trading, they say it can apply similarly to 1H / 4H / Daily.
They describe bullish structure as:
- Higher lows
- Higher highs
- Including a protected low and a high

2) Use the Indicator to Identify POI Zones Between the Range

The indicator places zones between the low and high boundaries.
They recommend enabling settings that control setup direction:
- Turn off bearish setups in bullish conditions (to avoid “cooked” entries)
- Use the opposite direction when bearish

3) Six-Tap Model for Zone Quality

They claim the best zones follow a “six-tap model” (taps labeled 1–6).
They define zones as “unmitigated”:
- Where 50% has not been traded back into
- (They reference a 50% dashed line.)
They treat POIs as valid when price shows the expected liquidity interaction:
- Wait for the liquidity sweep (labeled as “number 4”)
- Then aim for rejection around 50% of the zone (or close to it)

4) Confirm on a Lower Timeframe (Avoid Blind Entries)

After identifying the POI on the higher timeframe:

Drop down to a lower timeframe (often 1-minute).
Require a shift in structure (confirmation), such as a close above/below a key level.
Only enter if the confirmation occurs within the printed zone.
If price breaks through the zone without structural confirmation:
- They don’t take the trade, framing it as avoiding losses from missing confirmation.

Indicator Usage / Configuration Notes

In TradingView, they enter the indicator via Indicators.
They mention an “AMN model” and instruct toggling:
- “Bullish only” or “Bearish only” depending on trend
They recommend a balanced approach:
- On 1–5 minute ranges, more zones appear (more setups) but potentially lower quality.
- They prefer fewer, higher-confidence setups for a higher win rate (they claim a “crazy high” win rate).

Two Real-Trade Examples (What They Demonstrate)

Example 1: Bullish Buy Scenario

The indicator marks a demand zone between the higher-timeframe low/high.
They wait for a liquidity sweep, then look for price to reach ~50% of the zone.
On the lower timeframe, they wait for a structure shift (example: a close above a prior high).
Then they set:
- Entry at the confirmation location
- Stop loss below the zone low
- Target at the higher-timeframe higher high
They claim the trade hits take profit.

Example 2: Bearish Short Scenario

Structure indicates lower highs / lower lows.
The indicator provides multiple zones, but they ignore the higher zone if it conflicts with the trend.
They use the same six-tap / 50% POI logic:
- Require a sweep into/near 50%
- Require a lower-timeframe structure shift confirming downside (e.g., a candle close below a key level)
If the shift doesn’t happen before price breaks through the zone, they won’t trade.
They place:
- A stop above the zone
- A target down to the expected low
They claim it also reaches the target.

Purchase / Access Notes

The indicator costs money.
Access is provided via a link in the video description.
After purchase, they ask buyers to send their TradingView username through WhatsApp support chat or Discord, specifically to “the real me” as an anti-scam step.

Main Speakers / Sources

Primary speaker: The video’s creator/trader (no named guest in the subtitles).
Sources referenced: TradingView, and the creator’s paid supply/demand indicator (including an “AMN model” setting).