Summary of "Ни черта не будет! Жизнь без интернета // Злоба Дня"

Summary

A Russian deputy from LDPR, Svintsov, publicly argued that Russia could live without the global internet, claiming social-media blocks protect citizens’ security and that people should communicate more in person. He predicted Telegram and other services would be blocked or throttled and argued VPNs wouldn’t help.
Authorities are moving toward technical autonomy for the Russian internet — a bill supported by the Ministry of Digital Development would allow the Runet to operate disconnected from the global web. The LDPR faction reportedly voted against that bill.
The program criticizes the inconsistency and authoritarian thrust of these moves, and warns of practical and political consequences.

“Not a damn thing will function.” — Deputy chairman of the Information Policy Committee, LDPR member Svintsov (as quoted)

News outlets including Kommersant report Telegram outages and slowed services.
Users have reported problems with SDEK, Yandex, Kinopoisk and even some fixed-line slowdowns.
The presenter warns that such shutoffs would break everyday services (banking, taxis, food delivery) and cripple many businesses and public services.

Moscow Pedagogical University denied forcing students to install the domestic “Max” messenger.
Reports about traffic police checking phones and other coercive measures were called fake by authorities.
The program treats many official denials skeptically, suggesting a potential rapid shift from persuasion to coercion.

The commentary links the internet-control push to possible preparations for large-scale mobilization or martial measures.
It criticizes elite hypocrisy — many Russians and officials live or holiday abroad even as domestic controls tighten.
The piece highlights a contradiction: the state promotes domestic alternatives like Max while remaining dependent on Western technology.
Noted oddity: Max is reportedly installable in many countries but not China.

China’s five-year plan and push for global tech leadership are discussed as a parallel: China operates its own controls and firewall, while Russia’s approach combines censorship with technological dependence and economic contradictions.

The commentary is sharply critical and sarcastic toward officials (including Svintsov and references to Vladimir Zhirinovsky).
The presenter urges viewers to subscribe, mirror content to other platforms, and support the channel via Patreon, PayPal, agitblog.ru, etc., so broadcasting can continue if wider blocks occur.

Svintsov — Deputy chairman of the Information Policy Committee, LDPR member (quoted)
Vladimir Zhirinovsky (referenced)
Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media (Russia)
LDPR faction (reported to have voted against the autonomy bill)
Kommersant (newspaper reporting outages)
Business Newspaper (recounting Svintsov’s remarks)
Moscow Pedagogical University (denial referenced)
Roskomnadzor (mentioned re: blue ticks)
Philosopher Alexander Dugin (ideas referenced)
“Max” messenger (domestic app discussed)
Telegram, WhatsApp, Google, Yandex, Kinopoisk, SDEK, Sberbank (services referenced)
Mr. Dmitriev (mentioned briefly)
agitblog.ru, Patreon, PayPal, Boost (platforms/sites mentioned)