FIR on Aditya Thackeray? Adv Nilesh Ojha reveals explosive details on Disha Salian Murder Case

Overview

Advocate Nilesh Ojha makes claims in the Disha Salian murder case that a court order requires the CBI to take action against a wider set of alleged individuals, including Aditya Thackeray. He argues that there is now sufficient “digital proof” to support a case severe enough to seek the death penalty.

Key Points

• Court-directed CBI action

  • The court ordered the CBI to register an FIR
  • The court ordered recording of the statement of Satish A(yan) Ji
  • The court also directed appointment of a senior officer to proceed

• Names to be made accused

  • Ojha claims the court’s order implies that those with evidence should be formally made accused
  • He adds that the investigation should submit a report to the court
  • He argues that any closure/report filing should not include people against whom there is no evidence

• Request to challenge any “cover-up” by CBI

  • Ojha says that if Satish A(yan) Ji believes the CBI is protecting certain accused, they can file a protest petition against the CBI

• Police records to be handed over

  • Ojha states that Malwani Police has been ordered to immediately hand over records to the CBI

• FIR to include additional alleged perpetrators

  • Ojha reiterates that a petition was filed seeking FIR registration not only related to Aditya Thackeray, but also 15–20 other names
  • He claims the court effectively expects these names to remain part of the list

• Delay vs evidence after six years

  • In response to skepticism, Ojha insists that after six years there is adequate evidence available now, emphasizing digital evidence

• Demand for speed

  • Ojha presses for immediate action, including starting the CBI process and demanding a faster investigation
  • He states that the order will be uploaded now
  • He indicates they plan to take Satish A(yan) Ji to the CBI once he recovers

Presenters / Contributors

• Adv. Nilesh Ojha
• Satish A(yan) Ji