Мне пришла повестка и я пошел в военкомат где узнал что 3 года был в розыске и меня положили в дурку

Overview

The speaker provides a first-person account of being forcibly processed through Russia’s military registration and enlistment system (voenkomat) after receiving an electronic summons. He describes it as a multi-stage escalation that, in his view, can end with detention in psychiatric facilities.

Main Points and Claims

Electronic summons and “restrictions”

• In February (around Defender of the Fatherland Day), he says he received an electronic summons and “restrictions” that prevented him from simply leaving or ignoring the notice.
• He portrays the system as having shifted away from needing to physically locate a person to make them sign.

Claim of being “wanted” for three years

• At the voenkomat, he says officials told him he had been on a wanted list for three years, despite him not noticing prior restrictions.
• He frames this as implying serious administrative oversight—or hidden enforcement.

Fines as an escalating mechanism

• He describes being pressured into paying a fine (10,000–30,000 rubles), which he claims was likely set to the maximum.
• He also claims that separate administrative cases can be opened for each summons, and that continued noncompliance can lead to imprisonment.

Attempt to avoid service via medical grounds (asthma)

• He says he has chronic rhinitis and was advised by his doctor it could develop into asthma.
• He claims he legally requested further evaluation for asthma, assembling documents and planning how to pursue a referral.
• His intention, as he describes it, was to be ruled unfit if asthma was confirmed.

Medical commission portrayed as arbitrary and noncompliant

• He describes the commission as chaotic and disrespectful—for example, being pressured to undress in a hallway.
• He claims doctors repeatedly marked people “fit” even after evidence was presented.
• He argues that the system does not properly consider legal or medical objections.

ENT specialist and psychologist outcomes

• He says the ENT specialist dismissed his documentation and assigned a different suitability category rather than granting the asthma workup he expected.
• When he reached the psychologist, he says he answered plainly (“fit”) and instead received a referral to a mental hospital, which he portrays as surprising.

Psychiatric referral explained as punitive strategy (his interpretation)

• He claims many other men expected to avoid psychiatric evaluation but were sent anyway.
• He interprets delays and bureaucratic stalling (hours of waiting; staff repeatedly “busy”) as tactics to exhaust time and create grounds to label people as draft dodgers—or to fail them administratively.

Mental hospital “paperwork trap”

• He says his hospitalization was delayed due to lab tests (including “smears” from the throat/rectum) that needed submission within a narrow validity period tied to the delivery date, not the collection date.
• He claims public-hospital-only rules forced re-testing, and holiday closures reduced the already small submission window.
• He describes multiple rounds of testing and attempts to resolve the issue, eventually using a private clinic for faster results (at extra cost).

Key warning

• Even if someone believes they have no mental health issues, he argues they can still be committed after bureaucratic and procedural hurdles.
• He frames the process as a “circus” capable of breaking people mentally.

He plans to continue

• He says he will report what happens next after completing the mental-hospital process and returning with updated medical/testing results, including more detailed advice/opinion.

Tone and Persuasion Strategy

• He emphasizes that his account is meant to help others understand what to expect and avoid being unprepared.
• He says the video is not a “how to avoid service” guide, though he still offers practical observations (such as preparedness, legal knowledge, documentation, and using a voice recorder).

Presenters / Contributors

• Single presenter / author: the speaker (first-person narrator) recounting his own experience.