Video summary

Terkena Genjutsu Leteciel, Review IEM Leteciel After Rain (Bonus Leteciel Flower's Poem)

Main summary

Key takeaways

Product Review

Product reviewed

  • IEM: Leteciel / Letesial “After Rain” (IM1 Letesial Afterin)
  • Bonus purchase mentioned: Leteciel “Flower’s Poem” carrying case

Key features mentioned

Packaging / presentation

  • The box is described as solid and nice to display, tempting the reviewer to buy.
  • Includes postcards (the reviewer received 3) for display.
  • Includes a pin (the reviewer notes they got Hoshimi, with a possible Viv/Hoshimi variation for exchanges).

Design & build

  • Shell color described as “masculine pink.”
  • Looks like a resin-molded shell with artwork:
    • One side: “My Viv”
    • Other side: “My Hoshimi”
  • Not metal; described as solid, but plastic/resin-like.
  • Cable uses a two-pin connector for replacement.

Accessories

  • Comes with standard ear tips (3 pairs).
  • Pouch is “okay,” but the reviewer dislikes storing items in it (“rotten pouch” phrasing).
  • Included cable is not bad, but the reviewer wants a cable that matches the IEM theme color.

Optional/bonus accessory: “Flower’s Poem” case

  • Described as quite large: approx. 10.5 cm diameter and 5 cm high.
  • Includes acrylic + a pin (bonus).
  • Packaging marketing is joked about as “multi-use” (the reviewer references “kissing/licking/cuddling all night”).
  • Reviewer notes the case smells (odor/scenting mentioned).
  • Practical caveat: the shell shape can feel bulky on the reviewer’s ears, even if it feels/looks “manlier.”

User experience (fit, comfort, isolation, usage)

Comfort

  • Comfortable for sitting while listening.
  • During jogging, discomfort begins after about 45 minutes.
  • After ~1–2 hours, the IEM can start to feel heavy on the ears.

Isolation

  • Passive isolation depends on ear tips/ear tape, plus cables.
  • The reviewer mentions needing volume around 45 to compete with background noise.
  • They suggest isolation could “reach 7 or 8” with better tip/cable choices (not fully clear if this is a score or relative improvement).

Sound signature (detailed impressions)

Bass

  • Not known for extraordinary/booming bass; bass is more controlled.
  • Compared to the reviewer’s collection:
    • Similar to KZ D1
    • Better than CNGJ
  • Has bass sharpness, but no deep physical sub-bass impact.
  • Bass clarity is described as clearer than some, but not the best overall.
  • Advice given: don’t expect booming bass.

Midrange

  • Warm midrange with textured instruments.
  • Feels more neutral than KZ D1 in the midrange area (reviewer can’t clearly tell the difference, but leans slightly more neutral).
  • Vocals: clearer than before (the reviewer attributes some of this to enjoyment/bias).

Treble / upper range

  • Upper range is detailed with audible micro-details.
  • Male vocals may sound piercing.

Technicalities

  • Separation: described as easy.
  • Imaging: mostly fair.
  • Technical performance is described as not clearly better than some other models, including:
    • Not better than Moondrop Daybreak
    • Compared vs Moondrop Race and others
  • Overall framing: results may be compatibility-dependent, not universally “better.”
  • Technical assessment described as tier/general, not perfect across every micro-metric.

Comparisons made (explicit models)

  • KZ D1: similar comparison for bass/mids; reviewer feels Leteciel is more neutral in mids.
  • Moondrop Race: reviewer says bass/cl extra is not better than Race.
  • Moondrop Daybreak: reviewer says imaging/technicalities are not better than Daybreak.
  • CNGJ: reviewer notes Leteciel bass is better than this one (based on their references).
  • KZ D7 mentioned indirectly (reviewer’s recollection suggests Leteciel’s performance doesn’t surpass top contenders).

Pros

  • Visually appealing; strong packaging/presentation value.
  • Fun extras: postcards and a pin (collectible/art theme).
  • Solid build feel (shell described as resin-like/plastic; cable “not bad”).
  • Detailed upper range with micro-details.
  • Separation described as easy; imaging is fair.
  • Comfort is good for seated listening.

Cons

  • Bass isn’t powerful/boomy; sub-bass impact is limited.
  • Can be piercing in treble/male vocals.
  • Bulky fit for the reviewer; heavier after ~1–2 hours.
  • Isolation can be limited and depends heavily on ear tips/cable/ear tape.
  • Case/shell accessories may be large/bulky (case size noted).
  • Reviewer wants a cable swap for better color matching (though the included cable is acceptable).

Ratings / numerical scores mentioned

  • Target price: Rp. 770,000
  • Tier/score references:
    • Reviewer says it lands close to Tier A.
    • They reference an “high B” score of 6.2 (exact product score is not clearly stated).
    • Mention of adjusting/rebalancing scores in future.

Overall verdict / recommendation (from the video)

Recommended for listeners who want a detailed, generally warm/neutral-leaning sound with good upper-range detail and easy separation—but not for bass-heads (especially those expecting strong sub-bass impact). Comfort is fine for seated use, but may become uncomfortable during longer sessions or active movement like jogging.

Unique points list (all distinct mentions)

  1. Fits the “right person’s hands” (target-audience fit).
  2. Price mentioned: Rp. 770,000.
  3. Solid, display-worthy box.
  4. Includes postcards (3 received).
  5. One postcard/item possibly bent.
  6. Mentions faded writing/art; unclear metaphor involving “tofu-like items.”
  7. Includes a pin; reviewer received Hoshimi and notes potential Viv/Hoshimi exchange.
  8. IEM color described as masculine pink.
  9. Shell described as resin mold look; artwork My Viv / My Hoshimi.
  10. 2-pin cable requiring the correct connector type for replacement.
  11. Included cable is okay, but reviewer wants theme-matching color.
  12. Reviewer replaces cable with a blue cable.
  13. Ear tips included: 3 pairs.
  14. Pouch is better than none, but disliked for storage.
  15. Mentions Flower’s Poem case marketing as “romantic/odd” and multi-use.
  16. Case purchased: Flower’s Poem.
  17. Case dimensions approx. 10.5 cm diameter, 5 cm high (large).
  18. Case has carving, plus acrylic + pin bonuses.
  19. Case can be smelled (odor note).
  20. Sound testing described using a DAC/gear setup and phone references.
  21. Bass is not extraordinary; no booming physical sub-bass.
  22. Bass sharpness exists (mid/low bass and subbass mentioned).
  23. Bass clarity compared to other models; not better than Moondrop Race (as stated).
  24. Warm midrange with textured instruments.
  25. Mids possibly more neutral than KZ D1, though difference is hard to tell.
  26. Vocals clarity described as advanced (possibly influenced by bias/enjoyment).
  27. Upper range detailed with micro-detail; male vocals can be piercing.
  28. Some sounds can feel quiet with certain tips (IBT earbud tips mentioned).
  29. Separation: easy.
  30. Imaging: mostly fair.
  31. Technicalities not better than Moondrop Daybreak.
  32. Overall assessment may be compatibility-dependent.
  33. Comfort: good sitting; jogging discomfort starts after 45 minutes.
  34. After 1–2 hours, IEM can feel heavy.
  35. Passive isolation depends on ear tape, cables, and tips; volume target around 45 to overcome background noise.
  36. Build described as solid (plastic/resin-like, not metal); rated around 7 in build (as mentioned).
  37. Value for money: reaches 7 easily, 8 difficult versus top products.
  38. “Ending” close to Tier A, referencing near high B (6.2).
  39. Concluding encouragement: “worth it” (enthusiastic wrap-up).
  40. Mentions a sample playlist and suggests checking description for tier list/scores; no additional numeric product score clearly provided.

Speaker / contributor views

  • Single primary speaker (“Yoga”) delivers the full review, including impressions, comparisons, comfort testing, and tier/score references.

Original video