2026년 제14회 행정사2차 행정사실무법 기출해설특강 #정진석행정사 #가장빠른해설 #합격의법학원

Summary

The lecture reviews the 14th Administrative Agent second-stage exam, focusing on how to analyze the main case question and prepare for future exams. The instructor emphasizes that a clear answer structure and careful reading can earn marks even when a candidate is unsure of some legal details.

1. General exam strategy

• Do not feel obliged to answer questions in order. Start with the questions you can answer confidently.
• Short-answer questions are largely a memorization task. Accurate recall and writing down the relevant points directly tend to earn marks, but these questions become difficult if the material has not been memorized.
• For case questions, first identify the issue and organize the answer. The recommended sequence is:
  1. Read the question carefully.
  2. Identify the type of administrative appeal and the parties.
  3. Identify the relevant disposition and deadlines.
  4. Divide the issues into clear headings.
  5. Apply the rules to the facts.
  6. Answer the question’s requested conclusion explicitly.
• Follow the wording of the prompt. If it asks about two matters, address both separately. The instructor says some candidates lost marks by answering only one part.
• Build the outline before trying to memorize every detail. For non-contentious proceedings in particular, missing a major heading can cost more than writing a less-than-perfect explanation under it. Repetition is presented as the way to retain the material.

2. A practical method for marking up a case question

The instructor recommends using four highlighters to make important information visible. The precise color assignments are not entirely consistent in the auto-generated subtitles, but the method is to mark:

• The question and requested conclusion.
• The type of appeal or judgment.
• The claimant and respondent administrative agency.
• The relevant dates, deadlines, and other key facts.

Then identify, in order:

1. What disposition was issued.
2. Who received it and who is bringing the appeal.
3. Which administrative agency issued it.
4. Whether the appeal was filed within the applicable period.

The instructor stresses that this is both an exam technique and a useful professional habit for someone handling administrative appeals.

3. Main case: An omitted notice in a refusal-of-reward case

The case concerns a person who reported suspected illegal resale of apartment presale rights and later applied for a reporting reward. The application was refused because the relevant budget had been exhausted. The person argued that the refusal was unlawful because the agency had not provided the required information about appealing.

The instructor’s key points are:

• A refusal disposition generally involves:
  1. An application seeking an act involving the exercise of public authority.
  2. A refusal that affects the applicant’s legal relationship.
  3. An applicant who has a legal right to make the application.
• The instructor says the statutory definition of a disposition should be memorized accurately. A refusal can qualify as a disposition when the relevant requirements are met.
• Failure to provide information about how, where, or by when to appeal does not, by itself, make the disposition invalid. As presented in the lecture, non-notification is relevant mainly to the appeal period.
• The facts raise two distinct matters: whether the correct administrative appeals body was used, and whether the appeal was filed in time. The instructor urges candidates to answer both.
• The instructor treats the governor as the agency that issued the refusal and explains that, for a governor’s disposition, the competent body is the Central Administrative Appeals Commission. Filing with a provincial commission would therefore be the wrong forum.
• The instructor treats the appeal as having been filed within the extended period associated with failure to notify. The subtitles discuss the relevant date as July 2, 2025, and describe the period as 180 days. The transcript’s wording about dates and periods is unclear, so this should be understood as the instructor’s explanation of the exam scenario rather than a definitive statement of the law.
• For the first subquestion, the instructor’s proposed conclusion is that the claimant’s argument—that the refusal itself was unlawful because appeal information was omitted—is not valid.

The instructor also refers to a 1987 precedent for the proposition that failure to provide required notice may affect the appeal period without creating a defect that invalidates the underlying disposition.

4. Other exam topics reviewed

• Business suspension and closure reports: The instructor reviews reporting obligations related to suspending or resuming business, business closure, and re-registration. Candidates should organize the answer around the headings in the prompt and include the relevant time limits and consequences. Some specific figures in the subtitles are unclear.
• Succession of administrative sanctions: The lecture recommends organizing this topic under the succession of status, dispositions, and violations.
• Disqualification and avoidance: The instructor identifies fairness as a central idea and advises learning the relevant categories and answer outline.
• Methods of trial in non-contentious matters: The suggested outline is:
  1. Introduction.
  2. Types of proceedings.
  3. Method of trial.
  4. Notice of the trial.

The instructor emphasizes writing all major headings, even if the details are brief.

5. Preparation for the next exam

• Review past exams, including older questions, because previously tested topics may recur.
• Prioritize topics that have appeared frequently, while still preparing across the syllabus so that an unexpected topic is not entirely unfamiliar.
• The instructor describes the exam as containing a substantial case-based component and several short-answer questions. Candidates should combine memorization with structured application to facts.
• For a lengthy case question, identify a manageable number of main issues, set out the framework, and then reach a direct conclusion.
• The lecture presents studying as a process of repeated review and gradual supplementation, rather than trying to memorize every detail perfectly at the outset.

Speakers and sources featured

• Instructor: An administrative agent whose name is rendered inconsistently in the auto-generated subtitles as Jeong Jin-seok, Jeong Hee-seon, or Jeong Hee-seong. He says he passed the exam with the highest score in 2018 and has taught and practiced for roughly eight years.
• Audience: Brief, unnamed responses from students attending the lecture.
• Sources discussed: The Administrative Appeals Act, the exam questions and fact pattern, and a precedent described in the lecture as dating from 1987.