Sosialisasi Kepmenkes No. 1111 Tahun 2026 tentang Pedoman Pemenuhan Kecukupan SKP bagi Named Nakes

Summary

The webinar introduces Minister of Health Decree (KMK) No. HK.01.07/MENKES/1111/2026, which sets out how medical and health workers can meet their required Satuan Kredit Profesi (SKP), or professional credit units, for license renewal and continuing professional development. The decree took effect on October 1, 2026, replacing earlier guidance.

Purpose and policy principles

The Director General emphasized that SKP is a means, not an end. Its purpose is to maintain and improve professional competence so the public receives safe, high-quality care—not to encourage workers to collect credits for their own sake.

The revised approach is intended to:

• Recognize professional development gained through clinical and other work, not only seminars and formal learning.
• Simplify administration and make the process more transparent and digitally accessible.
• Avoid creating new bureaucracy or repeatedly requesting information already recorded in a system.
• Preserve high competency standards and patient safety while simplifying requirements.
• Align licensing practices across health services, licensing offices, professional organizations, collegiums, and health facilities.
• Treat SKP as part of a broader professional-development ecosystem rather than as the property of a single institution.

The Director General proposed assessing the policy through three questions:

1. Are medical and health workers becoming more competent?
2. Is it becoming easier for them to maintain and develop their professionalism?
3. Are people receiving safer services?

Required SKP and proportions

• Doctors and specialist doctors: The five-year requirement falls from 250 to 160 SKP.
  • Learning: 20–40% of the total, or approximately 32–64 SKP.
  • Professional service: 60–80%, or approximately 96–128 SKP.
  • Community service: 2–10%, or approximately 3.2–16 SKP.
  • The former separate combined domain for learning, service, and professional dedication is removed.
  • Clinical service must account for at least 20% of the service-domain requirement.
• Dentists and specialist dentists, clinical psychologists, and pharmacists: The presentation says the five-year target remains 100 SKP.
• Other health workers: The target remains 50 SKP, with the previous proportions retained.
• Transition: Doctors and specialist doctors whose licenses expire by December 31, 2026, must meet the new 160-SKP requirement. Those who have already accumulated 160 SKP may be treated as having met the requirement under the new rules.

How SKP can be earned

The decree recognizes three broad domains: learning, professional service, and community service.

Learning

SKP values vary according to activity type, scale (local, national, or international), role (participant, moderator, or speaker), and learning hours. International activities generally receive more credit than comparable national or local activities.

Examples discussed in the presentation include:

• Seminars and webinars: For specific professional content, participant or moderator credit is generally higher at national and international levels than at local level. Speakers receive more credit than participants.
• Conferences, symposia, and workshops: Credit depends on scale, role, and hours; international workshop credit can be substantially higher.
• Independent learning and MOOCs: Credit is based on learning hours, with a small maximum for this activity type.
• Training: Credit depends on duration and whether the course is profession-specific technical training, organizational-performance training, or independent learning. Longer and international courses generally receive more credit.

The presentation distinguishes profession-specific material from general health material that can apply across professions. The exact SKP amount depends on the activity’s category and scale, as set out in the decree’s tables.

Professional service

The service domain includes both clinical and managerial or administrative work. Examples include:

• Patient assessment and diagnostic examinations, including certain telemedicine services.
• Laboratory and other supporting examinations.
• Professional interventions, with credit varying by procedure complexity or technology level.
• Other professional services, care activities, and non-care activities.
• Screening, health checks, and supporting examinations.
• Professional case notes or expertise records.
• Medico-legal reports and expert testimony.
• Epidemiological surveillance, outbreak response, and disaster response.
• Intensive assistance or adaptation and clinical supervision.
• Professional administrative services and managerial assignments.
• Case reports, internal case discussions, presentations, and scientific or professional writing.
• Further education, research, scientific publications, and other professional roles.

Credit amounts, evidence requirements, and caps differ by activity. For example, certain managerial assignments receive 10 SKP per year, while intervention credits vary by complexity. Some activities have five-year caps; others do not. Doctors and specialists are not subject to the same overall service-activity cap described for other professions, but they must still meet the minimum clinical-service proportion.

Community service

Recognized activities include:

• Medical services, mass treatment, and social assistance.
• Health education or professional counseling for the public.
• Special national assignments and participation in official teams, such as disaster or Hajj teams.
• Roles in scientific, professional, or relevant community organizations.
• Profession-related outreach through social media or mass media.
• Blood donation.

Credit values vary according to activity, scale, and supporting evidence. The decree newly recognizes blood donation, at 0.5 SKP per donation, according to the presentation.

Evidence and documentation

Depending on the activity, supporting evidence may include:

• Electronic medical records or activity summaries, often covering six months or one year.
• A signed record from the facility or institution, on official letterhead.
• Assignment letters, official decrees, certificates, or letters from the organizing institution.
• Reports, case records, publications, diplomas, competency certificates, or professional certificates.
• Attendance records and activity photographs or other documentation, where relevant.

The presentation stresses using the evidence specified for each activity. For example, an off-track further-education claim should be supported by a diploma or relevant competency or professional certificate, rather than only a recurring attendance certificate.

Verification and platform process

The presenters described two routes: APeL for certain learning activities and the SKP platform for recording and verifying SKP adequacy.

Learning activities submitted through APeL

1. Submit the application within the stated 30-calendar-day limit and on a working day.
2. The administrative check has a stated service target of one working day; the main verification target is two working days.
3. If asked to correct a submission, do so within five working days; otherwise, the application is automatically rejected.
4. The relevant collegium assesses the activity. The presentation gives a target of three working days for the main profession and a further three working days for other professions.
5. The collegium’s assessment determines whether the activity and its SKP value are accepted.

SKP adequacy on the platform

1. Enter or upload activity information and supporting documents.
2. Review the platform’s provisional calculation and confirm that the required domain proportions have been met.
3. When eligible—particularly if the license is due to expire within a year—select “request verification.”
4. The request enters the relevant collegium’s verification queue. The presenter cited a service target of 10 working days after the request is submitted.
5. Monitor the status in the account. If the request is rejected or returned, review the collegium’s explanation, correct or replace the documents, and resubmit where applicable.
6. Check proof of SKP fulfillment through the platform or the stated SKP website.

The presenters said the platform had been updated to reflect the new 160-SKP target for doctors and specialists. Requirements for other professions were described as unchanged.

Issues raised during the Q&A

• Automatically rejected submissions: Applicants were advised to upload or submit them again, while observing the correction deadline.
• Webinar credits rejected for a radiographer: The team said it would coordinate with the relevant radiographer collegium; no definitive resolution was given during the session.
• Service activities not yet verified: Applicants may need to meet their domain targets and select the verification-request button. Uploaded material does not necessarily enter the collegium’s queue automatically.
• Nurse’s service and community-service targets: The response cited a service target of at least 35% and community service of 5%, with the remaining requirements met through the applicable domains.
• Verification delays: The stated service target after requesting verification was 10 working days. Participants were told they could contact the team about unresolved delays.
• Education not aligned with the current profession: Applicants were advised to submit a diploma or appropriate competency or professional certificate.
• Special service claims: Applicants should combine required supporting materials—such as certificates, assignment letters, and activity documentation—into an uploadable file.
• Workers assigned to structural or managerial posts: Such workers may claim eligible managerial service using the official assignment decree. The response cited up to 10 SKP per year for the relevant activity.

The session closed with a commitment to continue socialization and prepare an FAQ for questions not resolved during the allotted time.

Speakers and sources featured

• Opening host/moderator: Laela (name rendered inconsistently in the subtitles).
• Dr. Yuli Varianti: Delivered the Director General of Health Human Resources’ opening remarks.
• Dr. Zubaida Elvia, M.Ph.: Presented the decree’s SKP requirements and activity-credit guidance; identified in the subtitles as a secretary associated with the Indonesian Health Council and related professional bodies.
• Laela: Explained the verification and validation process.
• Audience members in the Q&A: Muliana of Lapkesda Bontang; Muhammad Helmi, a radiographer; Marsuki Bakri, a nurse; Nahrowi of the Nabire Health Office; Romi Setiawan, a nurse from Southeast Sulawesi; and Sony Hendra (name uncertain in the subtitles). Asmanidar was invited to speak but did not ask a question in the captured subtitles.
• Stakeholders discussed: Health councils, collegiums, professional organizations, health services, health facilities, licensing offices, and medical and health workers.