US Full Scale War Plan LEAKED After Yemen's Missiles Burn Riyadh | Mohammad Marandi

Overview

The video is a commentary arguing that the United States may be preparing to restart a wide regional war after leaked (“caught and leaked”) U.S. intelligence details—amid escalating strikes involving Iran and Yemen (Ansar Allah).

Main claims and analysis

US intelligence leak and looming US action

The host claims Iran’s “central military command” detected and leaked details of U.S. intelligence indicating the United States is preparing an attack using regional partners. This is presented as an explanation for:

• Airspace closures
• Flight cancellations
• Increased political and military urgency in the region

Two-front escalation narrative (Iran + Yemen)

The discussion argues the conflict is shifting from one front to two simultaneous threats:

Iran-focused escalation

Possible U.S. options are described as:

• Attacking Iranian military targets
• Targeting Iranian infrastructure

Yemen/Ansar Allah escalation

Because Yemen’s forces recently hit targets in Riyadh (including an international airport), the argument is that the U.S. could also expand involvement in Yemen.

Trump’s rhetoric as evidence of danger

Using excerpts from Fox News, the video claims Trump described options toward Iran as:

• “Wiping Iran out”
• Forcing Iran economically or through a deal

The guest argues this language is unprecedented and suggests escalation is more likely than negotiated restraint.

Iran’s readiness and likely retaliation

The guest claims Iran is on full alert and has improved capabilities over recent months. Likely responses described include:

• Strikes on U.S. military assets (including potentially naval targets)
• Economic and infrastructure retaliation against participating countries
• Severe regional consequences if critical infrastructure is struck (described as long-term weakening of Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states)

Iran’s advantage vs U.S. vulnerability

The guest argues Iran is less vulnerable because its forces and command/control are:

• Widely dispersed
• Underground

Meanwhile, U.S. forces are characterized as more exposed.

Warnings about the Strait of Hormuz / Red Sea

The video emphasizes that Iran could disrupt global energy flows and shipping by:

• Targeting oil and gas facilities to constrain trade routes
• Portraying the Strait of Hormuz as effectively “not necessary” as a single chokepoint if broader energy infrastructure is destroyed
• Suggesting U.S. warships should move farther into the Indian Ocean, implying risks involving missiles or electronic warfare (e.g., jamming)

Yemen’s offensive as strategically important (but not merely a proxy)

The guest insists Yemen’s role is not simply proxy control by Iran, arguing instead that:

• Yemen’s coalition government and armed forces are the primary actors

However, the video also argues Iran benefits indirectly because the Yemen theater:

• Increases pressure on Western posture
• Accelerates economic instability

It highlights the Saudi-led start of Yemen’s conflict as an origin point, with blame directed at Saudi actions and Western support.

Global economic catastrophe framing

A major theme is that escalation would cause global economic pain and potentially trigger a deeper downturn/depression. Expected impacts include:

• Energy and supply-chain shocks across markets (e.g., oil, diesel, LNG, fertilizer, chemicals)
• An argument that the West/US cannot “industrialize out” of the crisis as it did in the past (e.g., World War II), due to modern global complexity

Political timing

The guest suggests escalation may be occurring or intensifying for domestic U.S. reasons, potentially tied to:

• Midterm politics
• The idea that war pressures could damage Trump politically as well as the global economy

Israel/US relationship claim

The video claims Israeli leadership is pushing for approaches that impose costs on Washington if Israel is harmed—described as an “Israel-first” logic.

Palestine as the underlying driver (explicit claim)

In the later portion, the host/guest argue the broader regional wars—and the “global catastrophe” framing—are fundamentally linked to:

• Support or opposition to genocide in Gaza
• A portrayal of Western elites as opposing resistance movements

Overall conclusion of the video

The speakers conclude that the U.S. appears positioned to escalate toward war with Iran and/or Yemen, and that even “limited” conflict would still worsen global energy and financial outcomes, potentially leading to widespread instability.

They portray Iran and Yemen as prepared to endure escalation and counterattack, while describing Western actions as irrational and self-damaging.

Presenters / contributors

• Mohammad Marandi (host)
• Professor S. Muhammad Marandi (guest; repeatedly referred to as “Professor Morandi/Mandi”)