Video summary

NEW 3XO PROS AND CONS🥵| Should you buy ? | Mahindra xuv 3xo 2026

Main summary

Key takeaways

Product Review

Product reviewed

Mahindra XUV 3XO (2026 model) — discussed with a focus on the AX5 variant (driving impressions), alongside comparisons across:

  • Petrol vs diesel
  • Segment rivals, notably Tata Nexon and Maruti Brezza
  • Other torque-converter-equipped setups (e.g., Maruti/related AT options)

Key features mentioned

Engines (3 options total)

  • 1.2L turbo petrol (two variants mentioned)
  • 1.5L diesel

Performance specs (as stated)

  • 1.2 petrol: 109 bhp, 200 Nm
  • 1.5 diesel: 115 bhp, 300 Nm
  • Engine feel: described as powerful and refined, with no sense of lag during driving.

AX5 interior/tech (value-focused)

  • 10-inch screen
  • Dual-zone auto AC
  • Wireless charger
  • Cruise control
  • Digital instrument cluster
  • Auto-fold ORVM
  • Push-button start
  • Rear camera
  • Sunroof (panoramic mentioned)
  • Auto headlamps + rain-sensing wipers
  • Leather/varying seat trims (mentioned)
  • Rear AC vent
  • Rear defogger + rear wiper

Braking & driving dynamics

  • All four disc brakes (highlighted as a strong point for AX5)
  • Steering modes: Comfort / Normal / Sport
    • Sport: heavier feel
    • Comfort: smoother feel
  • Ride/handling: excellent and stable at high speeds
  • Suspension + ground clearance praised

Safety

  • 5-star safety rating mentioned
  • Additional note: door/outer structure feels sturdier than some competitors

Pros (unique positive points)

  1. Strong engine performance & refinement

    • 1.2 petrol (3-cylinder) and 1.5 diesel (4-cylinder) feel powerful with good drivability.
  2. Value pricing

    • Base petrol: ~₹7.80 lakh ex-showroom
    • Top variant: ~₹15.40 lakh ex-showroom
    • AX5 pricing mentioned:
      • Petrol AX5: ~₹13.0 lakh ex-showroom (noted in text as ₹1,30,000, interpreted as ~₹13 lakh based on context)
      • Diesel AX5: ~₹12.19 lakh ex-showroom
    • Rough on-road estimate (AX5 diesel): ₹13.5–₹14 lakh
    • Notes: GST changes reduce prices initially, then gradual increases later.
  3. Good cabin and seating space

    • No complaints about front/back space.
  4. Build quality feel + stronger door/outer structure

    • Compared against Nexon/3XO/Brezza, with “door feel” used as a yardstick.
    • 3XO described as heavier/sturdier.
  5. Feature-rich for the money

    • AX5/RVX A-level variants positioned as especially strong on equipment vs price.
    • Compared with rivals whose similarly priced variants may offer fewer features.
  6. Ride quality, stability, and handling

    • Stable lane changes even around 140 km/h.
    • Steering modes and suspension feel composed and adaptable.

Cons (unique negative points)

  1. Boot space smaller than expected

    • Company claim: 364 litres (measured differently)
    • Practical/general figure mentioned: about 295 litres
    • Likely concern for long trips (owner feedback referenced).
  2. Mileage/Fuel efficiency slightly lower

    • Diesel: “slightly less mileage” attributed to stronger performance.
    • Turbo petrol: warned it typically won’t be great for city use.
    • Rough city figures mentioned:
      • Petrol (turbo): ~10–12 km/l
      • Diesel: ~14–15 km/l (also cited as ~15–16, with max around ~14–15 depending on driving)
    • Implication: choose turbo petrol mainly for highway-heavy driving.
  3. Diesel automatic issue (AMT behavior)

    • Diesel uses AMT, not a true torque-converter automatic.
    • Criticism: AMT jerks, making the diesel experience less smooth than torque-converter competitors.
    • Conclusion from the discussion: a smoother “proper” diesel AT setup isn’t available in the referenced lineup.
  4. Manual driving issues (diesel manual as experienced)

    • Harder gear shifting; described as “no fun in changing gear.”
    • Long clutch travel mentioned.
    • No dead pedal (not included with the mentioned spec).
  5. Driver comfort issue for tall users

    • Thigh support not suitable for a ~6 ft tall driver.
    • Possible workaround: aftermarket seat cover/adjustments.
  6. After-sales/service concerns

    • Service quality varies by dealer/city.
    • Mahindra service described as bad for some users.
    • Cautionary anecdote: sunroof breakage, with allegations of mishandling (car parked outside → water ingress).

Comparisons explicitly mentioned

Against Tata Nexon

  • Build/door feel: Nexon doors felt less heavy; 3XO felt sturdier.
  • Gear shifting feel: Nexon described as more “big car”-like, implying smoother shifting.

Against Maruti Brezza

  • Door feel: Brezza/Nexon perceived as less heavy compared to 3XO.

Against competitors with diesel AT

  • Sonet/Venue (torque converter) vs XUV 3XO diesel AMT (jerky behavior criticized).

Value/feature comparison

  • Rivals like Brezza and Venue “turbo” variants are mentioned as costing similarly but offering fewer features than the XUV 3XO AX5.

Overall user experience (what the video emphasizes)

  • Driving: Powerful engine feel, smooth refinement, excellent ride quality, and strong high-speed stability.
  • Usability: Feature set is strong from mid-variants; AX5 is positioned as the best value.
  • Ownership cautions: Boot size, mileage expectations, diesel AMT smoothness, and potential service reliability issues.

Verdict / recommendation (based on the video)

Recommended if you want a feature-rich, powerful, stable, comfortable SUV at strong value—especially in the AX5 variant.

Be cautious if you prioritize:

  • Large boot space
  • Best-in-class mileage
  • A smooth diesel automatic (video criticizes AMT behavior)
  • Adequate thigh support if you’re ~6 ft tall

Speaker notes (views by contributors)

  • Primary speaker (single viewpoint): Provides most details—engine/drive feel, feature list, value/pricing claims, boot/mileage criticisms, and the after-sales anecdote.
  • Other voices: No clearly separated additional speakers in subtitles; “owners” are referenced only as generalized viewpoints.

Original video