Video summary

TROUVER S70 Roller: 2 РЕКОРДА в одном обзоре🔥ЧТО ЗА ЗВЕРЬ?! ОБЗОР и ТЕСТ✅

Main summary

Key takeaways

Product Review

Product reviewed

Truver (Trouver) S70 Roller — a robotic vacuum/mop with an All-in-One station in the 40–50,000 rubles price range (as stated in the video).

Key features mentioned

Roller washing system (“washing roller”)

  • Retractable roller reaching closer to edges/walls (extends from the body edge).
  • Roller mounted similarly to vertical washing machines, with 12 nozzles for even wetting.
  • Includes a comb to untangle wound hair and wool.
  • Roller can rise ~14 mm on carpets (also referenced for dry cleaning), with carpet-related modes, including:
    • carpet avoidance in wet mode
    • roller lift / “vacuum + wash while leaving carpets drier”
    • transit mode
  • Roller downforce reported as ~4,700 Pa (claimed higher than Truver Z60 Ultra Roller Complete from an earlier review).
  • Cleaning module includes a silicone turbo brush, disassemblable for hair/fur removal.

Suction power

  • 28,000 Pa (manufacturer specification), validated via gap/crack tests.

Side brush behavior

  • Side brush rises straight from the floor during washing (no “dry-only” behavior).
  • Extends into corners.

Navigation

  • No typical tower/LiDAR on top; LiDAR is hidden in the body to keep the height low.
  • Uses “Covered Sense Navigation” with sensors under the LiDAR.
  • Body height: 9 cm (90 mm).
  • Object detection/avoidance exists but is described as weak.

All-in-One station (station features)

  • Robot performs:
    • charging
    • self-cleaning of dustbin
    • roller washing with hot water up to ~80°C
    • roller drying with hot air up to ~70°C
  • Servicing of clean/dirty water tanks inside the robot.
  • Station is NOT connected to sewer/water supply.
  • No automatic detergent mixing feature.
  • Large platform tanks:
    • ~4.5 L dirty
    • ~5 L clean

App / user experience

  • Controlled via a proprietary mobile app:
    • Russian interface
    • voice notifications and commands
    • easy Wi‑Fi connection
    • many cleaning parameter options and customization

Test results & performance highlights

Navigation / mapping

  • In an obstacle test, the robot briefly got stuck (on a dryer), then recovered and continued.
  • Some map issues attributed to a mirror (common for LiDAR-based robots).
  • Cleaning pattern indoors:
    • room-by-room perimeter
    • then serpentine
    • periodically returning to the station (about every ~15 m²) to wash pads/napkins
  • The test claims no uncleaned areas left.

Carpet & obstacle handling

  • Minimum gap problem: robot does not fit a 9 cm gap (even with disabled collision mode).
    • It could enter only at about 93–94 mm clearance (roughly up to 9.3–9.4 cm).
  • Object avoidance:
    • In good lighting: avoided 4/6 objects
    • Poor performance with socks/wires and in “pet surprise” simulations
    • In complete darkness: avoided 3/6, and failed to avoid any “pet surprise” simulations in that test
  • Item identification system described as weak, though cleaning accuracy is said to be better than robots without bumper sensors/cameras.

Battery / autonomy

  • Max-power wet cleaning runtime: 144 minutes
  • Usable cleaned area: ~106 m²
  • Includes a cleaning resume after returning to base, potentially allowing ~double the area coverage if needed.

Real suction power (gap/crack tests)

  • Gap tests on varying crack depths showed:
    • Silent mode: partial cleaning at about ~2 mm
    • Better performance at standard/turbo/max modes, reaching partial cleaning around ~6–6.1 mm
    • “Maximum Plus/Plutover mode” improved deeper gaps, with partial cleaning noted for ~12–18 mm in updated stand results
  • Video claims a “new record” due to design: one turbo brush (instead of two on older models), reducing aerodynamic losses and improving effective suction.

Dry and wet cleaning effectiveness

  • Floor dirt removal: described as excellent—better than alternative modules, with no streaks/smudges.
  • Difficult stain removal (coffee/sauce):
    • 100% stain removal in 3 passes
    • Prior best referenced: 4 passes
    • Typical roller/other robots: often 10–12 passes
    • Also described as better than Z60

Cleaning behind curtains/drapes (noted as a differentiator)

  • Robot can create a special map zone, then push curtains from behind to clean underneath/behind them.

Pros (as listed in the video)

  • Very high-quality wet cleaning over large areas:
    • self-cleaning + uniform roller wetting
    • minimal smearing; good clean surface contact
    • strong edge/wall coverage (roller extends to cabinet edge; wall/furniture cleaning)
  • Top record speed for hard stains: 3 passes
  • Record suction/power performance in tests (described as the most powerful robot vacuum tested in the project)
  • Cleans behind curtains and drapes (map zone + curtain-pushing behavior)
  • All-in-One station:
    • hot-water roller wash + heated drying
    • dustbin self-cleaning
    • larger water tanks
  • Good dry cleaning across surfaces:
    • hard floors: good pickup
    • low-pile carpets: thorough
    • medium-pile: acceptable for household use
  • Corner cleaning advantage from retractable side brush
  • More accurate than “sensor-lite” competitors due to bumper sensor system
  • App quality: Russian localization, voice notifications/commands, many settings
  • Good build quality and warranty/service availability

Cons / downsides (as listed in the video)

  • More blind spots than round pad/cloth robots, especially:
    • worse corner performance
    • blind spot near baseboard due to end clamp
    • larger blind spots around walls and corners vs circular-rotation models
    • reported magnitudes: up to ~2 cm along walls and up to ~7 cm in corners
  • Doesn’t fit 9 cm gaps; needs about 93–94 mm clearance
  • Object detection/avoidance described as weak:
    • especially poor with “pet surprise” simulations
    • degrades further in darkness
  • Station limitations:
    • not connected to sewer/water supply
    • no automatic detergent mixing
  • Higher noise at maximum power:
    • robot ~56–75.5 dB
    • station ~70–72 dB
  • New cleaning module requires periodic manual maintenance:
    • debris can accumulate behind the roller
    • dirty water tank plaque buildup
  • Self-cleaning observation:
    • container cleaned well, but HEPA filter clogged with debris after dirty tests (noted for future models)

Rating / scoring

  • Using the project’s updated scoring system, the robot scored 170 points (“very good result” for its price in the video).

Comparisons explicitly mentioned

  • Versus Truver Z60 Ultra Roller Complete

    • S70 Roller claimed higher downforce (~4,700 Pa vs Z60)
    • S70 stain removal said to be much better than Z60

  • Generally compared to

    • robots without bumper sensors/cameras (S70 cleans more accurately due to sensing)
    • older S70/Truver models with different turbo brush design (one turbo brush vs two)
    • competitors with round rotating cloths (S70 has more blind spots and worse corner cleaning)

Overall verdict / recommendation

Recommended if you prioritize:

  • high-quality large-area floor washing
  • very fast removal of difficult stains

…and you can accept:

  • corner/blind-spot limitations
  • poor “pet object” detection
  • inability to fit under tight 9 cm gaps
  • station setup requirements (no sewer/water connection and no detergent mixing)

The video frames it as one of the best in its price range (40–50k rubles), supported by record suction/downforce test results and 3-pass stain removal, totaling 170 points.

Speakers’/viewpoint breakdown

Only one main speaker is present throughout the review; no distinct multi-speaker opinions are separated in the subtitles.

Original video