$1.8M Total. These 2 Weeks I Took 100 Trades Across 5 Prop Firms. Here's What Worked and What Didn't

Performance / Payouts

Series progress

• Began roughly 2–3 months prior with $1.5M in profit payouts.
• Payouts documented up to $1.7M, and are now at $1.828M, approaching $2M.

Last 2 weeks

• Total payouts: $59,000 over the last 2 weeks (also discussed as $59K for the week).
• Additional breakdown mentioned:
  • Another payout after the 7th: $25,700
  • Multiple live/pending payouts referenced with approximate amounts: $10.3K, $8K, $7.6K, plus several pending (including “E8”).

Win/loss framing

• Outcomes are often measured as “wins/losses” relative to break-even at 1.5R.
• Claims some days run about 10% above break-even.

Assets / Instruments

• No explicit assets/tickers are named (no stocks, ETFs, crypto, commodities, or tickers).
• Trading is described as price action on a prop-firm “index/market” instrument with:
  • session times (e.g., Asia / NY / 6PM)
  • targets/stops expressed in points

Core Methodology (Fair Price → Mean Reversion)

The approach is presented as a repeatable framework using prop-firm evaluation rules plus consistent profit/stop templates.

Key concepts

Fair price / reference levels

• Uses the 6:00 PM open as a common “fair price” anchor for reversion trades.
• On some days, the fair reference shifts to one of the following:
  • Asian session open (especially when the 6PM open is not representative due to immediate direction/structure)
  • Pre-news price (notably after skipping CPI-related trades)
  • A post-tweet/news consolidation level as the new fair value
  • A weekend gap concept, treating weekend price changes as a “fair value” signal

Bias + mean reversion

• A higher timeframe bias determines whether he looks for longs or shorts.
• Trades are generally structured to revert back toward the chosen fair price level.

Entry triggers

• Displacement candle entries
  • Used when price moves strongly away from fair price and/or after a large wick/rejection.
• Break of structure entries
  • Preferred confirmation entries.
  • Emphasis: avoid entering with displacement when it’s “too early” and structure confirmation is available.

Profit target / risk templates (prop-firm rules)

Common TP/SL pairs (points)

• 38 points TP / 25 points SL (described as 1 to 1.5 RR)
• 19 points TP / 12.5 points SL (used when edge is smaller, often when there’s only ~15 points advantage)
• Mentions scaled sizing logic such as:
  • 25/38
  • 50/76 style regimes

Size adjustment rule (threshold near 25 points)

• If the opening candle size is > 25 points:
  • scale to a larger target/stop regime (e.g., “50/76” mentioned).
• If opening candle size is < 25 points:
  • use the smaller regime (e.g., 38/25 or 19/12.5).

Evaluation vs funded consistency caveat

• Notes that evaluation accounts have consistency rules, so he avoids overshooting or taking too much profit too quickly on evals.
• Implies different optimization depending on whether it’s evals vs funded vs live.

Daily / Session Execution Logic

Avoidance rules (events)

• Explicitly: “I’m not taking any trades of the CPI.”

CPI/news handling

• Uses reversion toward the pre-news price as the reference fair level.

Session-based approach

• 6 PM open
  • Often tied to a gap + reversion framework:
    • If opening candle indicates direction and there’s a gap, he may take continuation early, then revert back toward the open.
• Asian open
  • Often becomes the new fair value when 6PM is offset by immediate movement.
• NY open (9:30)
  • Treated as a cutoff/time boundary:
    • He frequently says he is “done after 9:30” (or “technically done at 9:30”).

Framework distilled (step-by-step)

1. Identify fair price anchor (6PM / Asian open / pre-news / post-news consolidation / weekend gap reference).
2. Determine bias (long/short) from higher timeframe direction.
3. Wait for entry confirmation:
   • Prefer break of structure over early displacement when structure confirmation exists.
   • Use displacement when structure is absent or already aligned with reversion potential.
4. Choose target/stop sizing:
   • If edge is small (~15 points): 19 TP / 12.5 SL
   • If edge is sufficient in a ~38 environment: 38 TP / 25 SL (1 to 1.5 RR)
   • If opening impulse is large (>25 points): scale up (e.g., 50/76 concept while maintaining ~1.5 RR logic)
5. Manage eval/funded differences:
   • Avoid eval patterns that violate consistency constraints (he repeatedly references not wanting to “win too much” too quickly on evals).
6. Time discipline:
   • Often stops entering around 11:00 for many accounts.
   • Some session logic ends the day around 9:30.

Key Numbers & Thresholds

Targets (TP) and stops (SL)

• 38 TP / 25 SL (1–1.5R template)
• 19 TP / 12.5 SL (for ~15 points edge conditions)
• Larger scaled variants mentioned: 50/76 and 76.50/50

Edge threshold

• If price moves more than ~15 points away from fair price, he sends a reversion trade.

Trade frequency

• Mentions aiming for ~10 trades in the AM, and possibly 20 trades across a day.
• Also critiques others for being too aggressive.

Explicit Recommendations / Cautions

• Do not trade CPI
  • Skip entries during CPI; use mean reversion to pre-news price instead.
• Avoid early displacement entries when break-of-structure is available
  • Argument: entering a few points early is unnecessary if waiting for stronger confirmation still captures sufficient points.
• Do not break sizing rules
  • If there isn’t enough edge (e.g., not ~15 points), don’t take the trade with the smaller template.
• Avoid discretionary profit targets on prop firms
  • Profit rules require optimized profit targets for EV, not discretionary market-based targets.

Disclosures / Disclaimers

• The provided subtitles do not explicitly include a “not financial advice” statement.
• Mentorship-related disclosure/conditions:
  • Mentions a link in the description indicates mentorship is “open”; if there is no link, it’s not open.
  • Emphasizes viewers should use their own discretion.
  • Mentions aggressive behavior is driven by his own multi-account scaling.

Presenters / Sources

• No external sources or other presenters are mentioned in the subtitles.
• The speaker is the sole presenter.