Video summary
2022 ICT Mentorship Episode 12
Main summary
Key takeaways
Main Ideas / Lessons Conveyed
- The “market structure for precision technicians” is framed as an advanced, repeatable price-action system, not something you can learn in one viewing.
- It requires study, homework, and backtesting on historical price data.
- The speaker emphasizes context over retail-style trend labeling (e.g., “higher high / higher low” by itself).
- The key question is:
- Is price likely to move up to take liquidity (buy stops / buy-side liquidity) or down to take liquidity (sell stops / sell-side liquidity)?
- Is it likely to rebalance an imbalance (e.g., fair value gap / FVG) by moving up or by moving down?
- The key question is:
- He teaches a top-down workflow:
- Daily = defines the parent narrative (bias/likelihood)
- Hourly → 50-min → 15-min → 5-min/4-min/1-min = used to find entries and manage risk, not to invent bias independently
- Institutional behavior is described using two core concepts:
- Imbalance → Rebalance (often discussed via Fair Value Gaps / imbalances)
- Liquidity runs (prices move where stops are)
- He argues that market algorithms/logic explain consistent level respect more than:
- harmonics
- Elliot Waves
- indicator-based approaches
- Fibonacci used as standalone “signals”
- He explicitly states he abandoned indicators for this reason.
Methodology / “Instruction Set” (Step-by-Step)
A) Define the Key Market Question (Bias/Likelihood)
Before trading, ask only:
- Will price go up to take buy-side liquidity (buy stops)?
- Will price go down to take sell-side liquidity (sell stops)?
- Is price more likely to rebalance upward (fill an imbalance / FVG) or downward?
Avoid relying primarily on:
- harmonic patterns
- Elliot Waves
- Fibonacci ratios as standalone signals
- simplistic retail trend patterns (like only HH/HL)
B) Identify Higher-Time-Frame Structure (the “Parent”)
On the daily chart, identify labeled swing types:
- Long-term High / Long-term Low
- Short-term High / Short-term Low
- Intermediate-term High / Intermediate-term Low between those swing points
Use the daily chart to set the expectation for where price is likely to move next (the “narrative”).
- Example described:
- price trades up into the high end of a daily FVG
- then breaks lower and revisits lower zones (discount levels)
C) Use “Imbalance Rebalancing” to Drive Intermediate Swing Labels
Principle:
- When an imbalance is rebalanced, the swing formed at that moment becomes an:
- intermediate-term high or intermediate-term low
Practical marking logic (conceptual):
- A large imbalance candle move (up or down) that later becomes rebalanced creates a key intermediate swing label.
- That label should generally act as a decision level later—price should not violate it in a way that invalidates the setup.
D) Intermediate-Term Structure Validity Checks (Don’t Force Trades)
He introduces rule-like expectations:
- An intermediate-term high may be expected to have short-term highs around it that it does not “overtake” cleanly (in his model, this helps infer weakness).
If the intermediate-term high/low is violated after the trade idea is formed:
- the idea is considered flawed
- the trader should cancel
- wait for new alignment
- do not “force it” or overtrade
E) Entry Logic via Order Blocks + FVG
(Higher timeframe sets expectation; lower timeframe triggers)
After the hourly/daily narrative suggests a move toward imbalance/liquidity, look for:
- fair value gap formation
- followed by displacement/disruption consistent with a structure shift
Hourly → lower timeframe confirmation
He often uses:
- 50-minute and 15-minute as intermediate steps
- 5-minute and 4-minute for more precise execution
Order block framing (his stricter interpretation)
Instead of defining an order block as only:
- “the last up candle before the move”
…he treats an order block as:
- a consecutive series of up-closed candles (in bearish cases, these are described as bullish candles that should cap price)
- located within a larger bearish market-structure context
Entry archetypes described
- Aggressive entry: short at/near a bearish order block zone, expecting price won’t break above the intermediate-term high
- Typically involves:
- price trading into the imbalance / FVG
- then rejecting in line with the order block logic
Risk placement
- Stop is typically above the relevant order-block high (or above the bullish candles acting as resistance)
- Target aligns with higher-time-frame objectives (e.g., lower liquidity / discount targets)
F) Targeting / Measurement Rules (Two Approaches)
1) Primary directional framework targeting
- Use the range between the long-term high and long-term low as the measurement basis for projections.
2) Fibonacci alternative
- Anchor Fibonacci to specific swings (the speaker stresses that changing the anchor changes projections).
- Example described:
- anchor Fibonacci from intermediate-term high to long-term low
- use projections like “standard deviation / -1.5 SD” (as described in the lecture)
G) “Institutional Order Flow” Validation (Behavior Inside/Around Order Blocks)
In practical terms (bearish scenario):
- Up-closed candles act like speed bumps/resistance
- When price returns into these up-closed candles:
- it should not overtake them
- otherwise, it undermines the bearish thesis
He reiterates:
- Intermediate-term high/low is the key invalidation level
- multiple violations imply the model is wrong
H) Trading Management Stance: When to Be Neutral
He ends with a “no forced bias” rule:
- He is not trading when he cannot justify one-sided bias
- If he can’t confidently frame both:
- a high-probability bullish case, and
- a high-probability bearish case,
- then he recommends:
- do nothing / stay neutral
Emphasis:
- avoid regret-driven trades
- don’t trade simply because “it could go either way”
Concrete Concepts Repeatedly Emphasized
- Fair Value Gap (FVG) / Imbalance as the movement engine
- Liquidity runs as the “why” behind direction:
- buy stops above old highs
- sell stops below old lows
- Imbalance rebalancing creates intermediate-term highs/lows
- Intermediate-term highs/lows as invalidation points
- Order blocks as zones of expected rejection, defined with his stricter logic:
- consecutive candle series within structure
- Top-down hierarchy:
- daily defines narrative
- hourly builds the setup
- 15-min/5-min/4-min supports execution
- Refusal to rely on “pattern astrology” and indicators as primary logic:
- harmonics, Elliot Waves, etc.
Speakers / Sources Featured
Speakers
- ICT (lecturer; referenced as “ICT” throughout)
Sources / Authors Mentioned
- Larry Williams (market structure ideas; via books/courses)
- John Murphy (Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets)
- Community/retail traders / educators (general, unnamed references)
Rate this summary
Your feedback will help improve summaries.
Improve this summary
Reprocess with a stronger model when the summary feels incomplete or inaccurate.
Translate summary in another language
Ask questions to this video
Chat for follow-up questions, clarifications, and source-backed answers.