Video summary

Studying With Extra Time Accommodations | Demon Daily, Ep. 1495

Main summary

Key takeaways

Educational

Main ideas & lessons

  • Accommodation (100% extra time) changes pacing, but not the underlying skill. The goal of LSAT/ELSAT prep is still the same: fully understand what you read and then answer questions based on that understanding. Extra time mainly means you must spend more time practicing those same skills.

  • Reading difficulty often comes from not “thinking while reading,” not only from ADHD. The hosts argue that even without ADHD, many students:

    • read too passively,
    • don’t stop to process meaning at sentence/punctuation boundaries,
    • and lose earlier meaning because they never synthesize what they’re reading.
  • A core reading strategy: stop at punctuation and build meaning incrementally.

    • Stop at every period and every comma
    • Think about how the current portion connects to the passage meaning you’ve built so far
    • Synthesize “core ideas” as you go (rather than only relating new text to the literal earlier words)
    • “Good readers” effectively assemble a puzzle progressively; that prevents losing the beginning.
  • Logical reasoning vs reading comprehension confusion.

    • One caller claims they do better on logical reasoning because ADHD causes them to “lose the beginning.”
    • The hosts counter that long sentences on both sections require the same kind of processing pauses (often at internal structure), and that the real issue is engagement/synthesis, not solely ADHD.
  • Using section practice scores to estimate full-test performance.

    • The caller avoided full practice tests due to time cost.
    • The hosts say doing multiple sections and combining results can still predict full-test outcomes:
      • You can merge 3–4 section results into an estimate of a full test score.
      • Section timing still predicts well.
  • With double time, expect more work and possibly longer timelines.

    • If a student effectively covers half as much content per day, improvement may be about half as fast unless they compensate.
    • Two compensation options are discussed:
      • Increase daily study time
      • Study over more weeks/months
    • They suggest an approach like “optimal is probably half and half” (some increase in daily time and some longer duration).
  • Practice full tests frequency.

    • For most students: no more than one full test per month.
    • For a double-time student: about one full test per month is still recommended, but it’s a larger time commitment:
      • the “test day,” and
      • the separate review day.
  • Practical note about finishing early on official accommodations.

    • The hosts advise that even if extra time is granted, official test software likely won’t let you move on early / it isn’t designed for finishing early.
    • Therefore, students should practice under realistic accommodation timing and expectations.
    • There’s also a cautionary example: some people have found certain large accommodations (e.g., 70 minutes) hurt them and may wish they had requested less than double time; however, for this caller’s profile, double time seems necessary.
  • Realistic expectation of finishing sections at current score level.

    • Based on the caller’s diagnostic (~146) and current score (~155), the hosts imply:
      • it’s unlikely they’ll finish sections even with double time,
      • and finishing is not the primary focus anyway.
    • They offer an approximate “path to the 150s”:
      • about 2 strong reading comprehension passages, and
      • about 15 logical reasoning questions correct.

Methodology / instruction list (detailed)

Reading comprehension / reading skill routine

  • At minimum, for each sentence:

    • Stop at every period
    • Stop at every comma
  • At each stop:

    • Ask: What is this saying right now?
    • Connect it to the meaning you’ve already built earlier in the passage (the “puzzle pieces” approach).
    • Integrate the new information into your synthesized/core-idea framework, not only by matching the literal previous wording.
  • Goal of the strategy:

    • Continuously build meaning “as you go,” so you don’t lose earlier parts of the passage.

Study planning with 100% extra time (double time)

  • Accept the constraint:

    • Reading assignments take about twice as long, so you must spend more total time learning/processing.
  • Choose one or both compensation strategies:

    • Increase study time per day, or
    • Increase the number of study weeks/months
  • Practical scheduling guideline proposed by the hosts:

    • Keep a similar structure (mix of drilling + timed sections), but:
      • because a timed section already takes ~70 minutes, you must account for that plus review,
      • you can either:
        • do fewer sections per week but extend the timeline, or
        • do the same number of sections by increasing total weekly time.
  • Full practice test recommendation:

    • Aim for ~one full practice test per month.
    • Plan review time as well (review effectively takes another half-day block similar to testing time).
  • Section practice alternative for estimating performance:

    • If full tests are too time-consuming, do multiple individual sections and then combine results to estimate full-test performance.

Practice accommodations realistically

  • Practice using your accommodation timing, because:

    • you may not be able to end early and automatically advance in the official software environment.
  • Caution about accommodation size:

    • some students may find certain large accommodations counterproductive, so consider that if relevant (though the hosts think the caller’s double time seems justified by the reading time described).

Speakers / sources featured

  • Ben Olsson (co-founder of elsademon.com; host)
  • Nathan Fox (co-founder of elsademon.com; host)
  • Gigi / GG (the email writer/student asking for advice; implied speaker/source via the correspondence)

Original video