Video summary
Studying With Extra Time Accommodations | Demon Daily, Ep. 1495
Main summary
Key takeaways
Main ideas & lessons
-
Accommodation (100% extra time) changes pacing, but not the underlying skill. The goal of LSAT/ELSAT prep is still the same: fully understand what you read and then answer questions based on that understanding. Extra time mainly means you must spend more time practicing those same skills.
-
Reading difficulty often comes from not “thinking while reading,” not only from ADHD. The hosts argue that even without ADHD, many students:
- read too passively,
- don’t stop to process meaning at sentence/punctuation boundaries,
- and lose earlier meaning because they never synthesize what they’re reading.
-
A core reading strategy: stop at punctuation and build meaning incrementally.
- Stop at every period and every comma
- Think about how the current portion connects to the passage meaning you’ve built so far
- Synthesize “core ideas” as you go (rather than only relating new text to the literal earlier words)
- “Good readers” effectively assemble a puzzle progressively; that prevents losing the beginning.
-
Logical reasoning vs reading comprehension confusion.
- One caller claims they do better on logical reasoning because ADHD causes them to “lose the beginning.”
- The hosts counter that long sentences on both sections require the same kind of processing pauses (often at internal structure), and that the real issue is engagement/synthesis, not solely ADHD.
-
Using section practice scores to estimate full-test performance.
- The caller avoided full practice tests due to time cost.
- The hosts say doing multiple sections and combining results can still predict full-test outcomes:
- You can merge 3–4 section results into an estimate of a full test score.
- Section timing still predicts well.
-
With double time, expect more work and possibly longer timelines.
- If a student effectively covers half as much content per day, improvement may be about half as fast unless they compensate.
- Two compensation options are discussed:
- Increase daily study time
- Study over more weeks/months
- They suggest an approach like “optimal is probably half and half” (some increase in daily time and some longer duration).
-
Practice full tests frequency.
- For most students: no more than one full test per month.
- For a double-time student: about one full test per month is still recommended, but it’s a larger time commitment:
- the “test day,” and
- the separate review day.
-
Practical note about finishing early on official accommodations.
- The hosts advise that even if extra time is granted, official test software likely won’t let you move on early / it isn’t designed for finishing early.
- Therefore, students should practice under realistic accommodation timing and expectations.
- There’s also a cautionary example: some people have found certain large accommodations (e.g., 70 minutes) hurt them and may wish they had requested less than double time; however, for this caller’s profile, double time seems necessary.
-
Realistic expectation of finishing sections at current score level.
- Based on the caller’s diagnostic (~146) and current score (~155), the hosts imply:
- it’s unlikely they’ll finish sections even with double time,
- and finishing is not the primary focus anyway.
- They offer an approximate “path to the 150s”:
- about 2 strong reading comprehension passages, and
- about 15 logical reasoning questions correct.
- Based on the caller’s diagnostic (~146) and current score (~155), the hosts imply:
Methodology / instruction list (detailed)
Reading comprehension / reading skill routine
-
At minimum, for each sentence:
- Stop at every period
- Stop at every comma
-
At each stop:
- Ask: What is this saying right now?
- Connect it to the meaning you’ve already built earlier in the passage (the “puzzle pieces” approach).
- Integrate the new information into your synthesized/core-idea framework, not only by matching the literal previous wording.
-
Goal of the strategy:
- Continuously build meaning “as you go,” so you don’t lose earlier parts of the passage.
Study planning with 100% extra time (double time)
-
Accept the constraint:
- Reading assignments take about twice as long, so you must spend more total time learning/processing.
-
Choose one or both compensation strategies:
- Increase study time per day, or
- Increase the number of study weeks/months
-
Practical scheduling guideline proposed by the hosts:
- Keep a similar structure (mix of drilling + timed sections), but:
- because a timed section already takes ~70 minutes, you must account for that plus review,
- you can either:
- do fewer sections per week but extend the timeline, or
- do the same number of sections by increasing total weekly time.
- Keep a similar structure (mix of drilling + timed sections), but:
-
Full practice test recommendation:
- Aim for ~one full practice test per month.
- Plan review time as well (review effectively takes another half-day block similar to testing time).
-
Section practice alternative for estimating performance:
- If full tests are too time-consuming, do multiple individual sections and then combine results to estimate full-test performance.
Practice accommodations realistically
-
Practice using your accommodation timing, because:
- you may not be able to end early and automatically advance in the official software environment.
-
Caution about accommodation size:
- some students may find certain large accommodations counterproductive, so consider that if relevant (though the hosts think the caller’s double time seems justified by the reading time described).
Speakers / sources featured
- Ben Olsson (co-founder of elsademon.com; host)
- Nathan Fox (co-founder of elsademon.com; host)
- Gigi / GG (the email writer/student asking for advice; implied speaker/source via the correspondence)