НОРВЕГИЯ ДАНИЯ ПРОГНОЗ ПОРТУГАЛИЯ УЭЛЬС ПРОГНОЗ ОБЗОР МАТЧА

Overview

The speaker records football forecasts late at night (around 2:00 a.m., Thursday, September 24) and encourages viewers to like the video and subscribe, while promoting Telegram channels for football predictions.

---

Norway vs Denmark (match analysis)

• Norway is described as strong and improving, particularly in attacking play. The speaker claims Norway advanced further than expected, reaching the quarter-finals and only being eliminated after extra time by England.
• Denmark is discussed mainly through friendly matches, with the speaker claiming Denmark did not participate in the World Championship due to qualification issues.

Goal/score expectation

• The speaker suggests that in Norway’s home matches, teams often exchange goals.

Betting-style predictions mentioned

• Possible Norway-favoring scorelines:
  • 2–1
  • 3–1
• A less likely scenario mentioned:
  • Denmark may fail to score, which would imply something like a 3–0 type result.
• The “both teams to score” market is initially dismissed, but later reconsidered as a potential safe bet.
• A referenced goals market:
  • TB 2.5, interpreted as Over/Under 2.5 goals
• Odds mentioned:
  • Approximately 1.75 for the suggested option

---

Portugal vs Wales (match analysis)

Team outlook and Ronaldo

• The speaker expects Portugal to manage Wales at home, with attention on whether Cristiano Ronaldo starts (estimated at ~85%).
• The speaker criticizes Ronaldo, saying he is not performing like before and has declined.

Head-to-head reference

• Portugal and Wales previously met about 10 years ago at the European Championship, where Portugal won 2–0.

Tournament/qualification context (as claimed)

• Portugal reached the Round of 16 at the World Cup (as stated).
• Wales allegedly missed the World Cup and lost in qualifiers to Bosnia.

Betting-style predictions mentioned

• Portugal win at home with over 2 total goals
• Odds mentioned:
  • 1.75 (again)

---

Presenters / sources

• No specific presenter name is provided.
• No external sources are cited; the only “sources” referenced are the speaker’s claimed historical observations and the promoted channels (Telegram/YouTube).