Video summary

आपके सभी सवालो के ज़वाब 👍Tata Nexon CNG Pure S Review - SalahCar

Main summary

Key takeaways

Product Review

Product reviewed

Tata Nexon CNG (Pure S variant) — ownership/drive experience shared by the owner Nikunj Garg and his mother (“Aunty ji”).

Key features mentioned

CNG engine experience

  • Power delivery feels smooth
  • No noticeable power loss when switching to CNG

Gearbox

  • 6 gears available from the base variant
    • Owner notes Pure/Smart variants have 6
    • Petrol is mentioned as having 5

Safety

  • Mentions 6 airbags in the base model
  • References a new safety rating that came out recently (no numeric score quoted)

Sunroof

  • Pure S has a very small sunroof, compared unfavorably to panoramic sunroof on higher variants

Comfort / ride

  • Comfortable seats
  • Good suspension for Indian potholes
  • Rear-seat comfort appreciated

Boot space / practicality (major highlight)

  • When the rear seat is folded, the boot provides a completely flat loading experience
  • Capacity comparison quoted:
    • ~321 L (CNG) vs ~388 L (petrol)
    • Claimed difference: ~60 L

Ownership & user experience (what they liked)

Build quality

  • Owner strongly praises Tata’s build quality as a key reason for choosing Nexon

Service / sales experience during purchase

  • Staff behavior was good
  • Any issues (if any) were resolved “hand to hand”
  • Discounts provided (insurance discount mentioned)
  • No waiting period pressure
  • No accessory pressure

Driving feel

  • No significant difference in power vs petrol (as per owner’s feel/“on paper” expectations)
  • Switching to CNG feels smooth because the engine starts in CNG
  • High pulling power attributed to torque being the same as petrol
    • 170 Nm mentioned for both

Mileage (reported during use)

  • City: around 18 km/l (varies with traffic: 18–17)
  • Highway: around 22 km/l
  • Company claim referenced: 24
    • Owner thinks real-life may be lower early on
  • A later trip suggests mileage improved, but no exact updated figure is provided

CNG filling

  • 8 kg CNG capacity quoted (during filling/at purchase state)
  • Claims fast filling compared with other CNG cars they’ve seen
  • They emphasize refill speed and capacity more than exact “per tank km” numbers

Pros (unique positive points)

  1. Excellent build quality (top reason for trust in Tata)
  2. Smooth CNG power delivery with no noticeable jerk/loss during transition
  3. Good suspension / ride comfort, especially on potholes
  4. Strong practicality: large boot and flat loading area
  5. Comfortable seats for long drives (they cite Vrindavan/Hisar trips; feeling not tired)
  6. 6 airbags and confidence in Tata’s safety reputation
  7. Purchase experience: discounts, no accessory pressure, cooperative staff

Cons / drawbacks mentioned

  1. Reverse gear issue: reverse “gets stuck” / doesn’t engage properly
    • Mentioned twice; may be car-specific
  2. Touchscreen / AC control annoyance
    • While driving, touch buttons can be pressed accidentally
    • Feels risky and requires careful attention
  3. Disappointing sunroof
    • Pure S has a tiny sunroof, not like a proper/panoramic unit
  4. Braking upgrade expectation
    • Owner felt brakes could be better with disc brakes on all four wheels
    • Notes rear discs as missing
  5. Vibration / initial NVH
    • Vibration on pedals (especially the clutch pedal) and some steering vibration
    • Some engine noise noticeable; higher-speed vibration may depend on road conditions (Yamuna Expressway mentioned)
  6. Fog lights not available in this variant (aftermarket needed if desired)
  7. Light response not great
    • Fog-light specific comment; “response is not that great” is mentioned
  8. Rear-seat / feature perception vs alternatives
    • Mentions Maruti Brezza as a comparison—claims Brezza lacked boot space/comfort and some features (qualitative, without detailed specs)

Comparisons made

  • Versus Maruti Suzuki Brezza
    • Brezza was considered initially, but Nexon was chosen for boot space, rear comfort, and features
    • Mentions confusion/waiting delays that pushed them toward Nexon
  • Versus Hyundai i10
    • Nexon felt better for reliability/long-term comfort and CNG filling/pack practicality
    • They compare noise and clutch/steering feel, plus boot practicality
  • Versus other Tata / segment models (general)
    • References Tata’s build safety reputation (and Tig/Tigor as examples)
  • CNG filling speed comparisons
    • Claims Nexon’s filling speed is faster than other CNG cars they’ve compared

Verdict / recommendation (based on the video content)

Recommended for buyers prioritizing comfort, build quality, safety (6 airbags), and especially boot practicality with CNG, along with smooth CNG driving.

However, buyers should be cautious about:

  • the mentioned reverse engagement issue
  • touchscreen/AC button safety (accidental presses)
  • missing fog lights
  • vibration/noise in certain conditions

A test drive is strongly advised, especially to verify reverse behavior and the touchscreen controls.

Speakers’ distinct points

Nikunj Garg (owner)

Main claims on:

  • build quality
  • smooth CNG power/transition
  • mileage (18 city / 22 highway)
  • boot space numbers (321L CNG / 388L petrol)
  • 6 airbags & safety confidence
  • purchase/service experience
  • reverse stuck issue
  • touchscreen/AC accidental presses
  • vibration/clutch pedal feedback
  • fog lights / lighting concerns
  • disc brake expectation

Aunty ji (mother)

Focused mainly on:

  • seat comfort
  • ride comfort (not tiring on trips)
  • overall happiness with Nexon
  • experience with cooperative staff

Original video