Simple MA rules for Determining Which Timeframe to Trade

Disclaimer / Source

• Educational purposes only. “Please do your own due diligence before making any investment decisions.”
• Presenter: Joe Raibel (channel speaker).

---

Finance-Specific Content (What the Video Teaches)

The video presents a moving-average based framework for deciding which timeframe model to trade (monthly vs. weekly). It uses an 18-day / 18-week / 18-month “18” moving average concept as a reference for pullbacks and setups.

Instruments / Tickers Mentioned

• Wayfair: W
• Signet Jewelers: SIG
• Energy stock: WKC (ticker as given; may be ambiguous without context)
• V (unspecified; referenced as “V”)
• VRTX (no full ticker stated beyond “VRTX”)
• PCRX
• COPE
• “DI” referenced as part of indicators (no ticker)
• Indicators/concepts mentioned:
  • MACD
  • ADX
  • RSI
  • Bollinger Bands (conceptual indicator framework; not a ticker)

---

Key Methodology / Step-by-Step Framework

Core Idea

Use:

• a higher-timeframe setup, plus
• a lower-timeframe trigger, only if price action is “near” the appropriate 18 moving-average area.

---

Timeframe Framework (Setup vs. Trigger)

• Monthly setup + Weekly trigger
• Weekly setup + Daily trigger

The video emphasizes you should choose one timeframe plan and stick to it (not optional).

---

“Two Criteria” for a Timeframe to Be Tradeable

1. The “18” moving average is rising on that timeframe
   • Example phrasing: “a rising 18… growing 18”
2. Price is close to that “18” (a pullback into its area)
   • Described as a region, not necessarily an exact touch.
   • Framing includes the idea that if price moves too far away (or does not show the needed proximity during the setup window), it may no longer qualify.

---

Additional Confirmation / Filters (Indicators)

The video prefers/looks for confirmations such as:

• MACD and ADX confirmation near a new high before the pullback/turn
• DI confirmation with MACD if the reversal appears early (described as additional)

Entry timing refinement

• RSI may be used for entry timing, explicitly suggested later for a breakout-style entry.

---

Operational Rule (When to Wait)

• If you can’t get the weekly setup with a daily trigger, then:
  • Wait for a better setup in the monthly market.
• If price is too far from the 18-month line:
  • Don’t force a monthly model; move to the next timeframe plan.

---

Examples / Application to Specific Tickers (Qualitative Calls)

Wayfair (W)

• Monthly vs. weekly distance is highlighted:
  • After a “reversal from the 18-month line,” price later moves too far out to play monthly.
• Weekly chart:
  • Shows a turn up + higher low acting like a trigger concept.
  • Daily may be used only for entry refinement if needed.
• Mentions a resistance area around “110” and waiting for strength through/near that level.

Signet Jewelers (SIG)

• Described as tied to the 18-month line for “3 or 4 months.”
• Suggested behavior:
  • If it forms a small pullback and higher low near that line → monthly setup + weekly trigger.

WKC (Energy Stock)

• Described as having strong earlier movement, then a retreat.
• Rising ADX is cited as a reason you might not need to wait for the 18-month level.
• Implies a shift toward a weekly/daily style plan based on support.
• Suggests a possible weekly trade on strong upside breakout, where a daily trigger might be unnecessary depending on strength.

V

• Example where price moves strongly upward, then returns to the week 18 / 18-week area.
• Reiterates the rising 18 + retreat into that region criteria.

VRTX

• Framed as a “breakout deal,” but the issue is distance from 18 (too far for a clean connection).
• Emphasizes:
  • a pullback to the rising 18
  • plus confirmation → weekly setup with daily trigger
• Entry may be refined using:
  • higher low
  • possibly RSI

PCRX

• Positioned on/near the 18-month line, characterized as low ADX.
• Suggests a trend line breakthrough approach for the monthly/weekly model.
• Quality/caution note:
  • Says it “hasn’t spent enough time building a large enough base,” implying potential problems later.
• Still suggests there may be enough room to attempt a monthly weekly play.

COPE

• Said to have strayed too far from the 18-month line, so it cannot be played as monthly.
• But it’s retreating to a growing 18-week with confirmation, making it a weekly-based plan.
• Reinforces need for 18 to be rising and near price; contrasts with cases where ADX/risk might change timeframe decisions.

---

Key Recommendations / Cautions Explicitly Stated

• Do not force the wrong timeframe model.
  • “Stick to the plan”: buy on pullbacks near 18 consistent with the chosen setup timeframe.
• If weekly setup + daily trigger doesn’t form, wait for a better monthly setup.
• Exception / flexibility:
  • With rising ADX and the stock near price support, you may trade without waiting for a full return to the 18-month level.
• Base-building caution (PCRX example):
  • Low ADX + not enough base time may lead to problems later.

---

Key Numbers / Levels Mentioned

• The recurring “18” moving average concept across timeframes (18-day / 18-week / 18-month).
• “110 area” mentioned as a resistance level on Wayfair (W) (no exact price beyond that level).
• “Week 40” and “month/18” mentioned in the V example context (qualitative timeline references).

---

Presenters / Sources

• Joe Raibel (only named source/presenter in the subtitles).