Video summary
Thematic literature review – how to write one without getting overwhelmed!
Main summary
Key takeaways
Main ideas / concepts / lessons
-
What a thematic literature review is
- A literature review whose structure is organized around themes.
- Themes can be ideas, concepts, events, or topics that relate to the research title and research questions.
- The structure is not fixed—you can tailor it to your topic, but that freedom can also feel overwhelming because you must generate the themes.
-
How many themes to use (in the final write-up)
- The final written-up thematic literature review should have between 3 and 5 themes.
- Fewer than 3 likely means you omitted important material or forced things into headings that don’t fit.
- More than 5 likely makes the review feel fragmented and may reduce how well the review connects across bodies of literature.
-
Why examples help
- Reviewing a sample structure helps you see:
- how many themes are used,
- what the headings look like,
- and how themes can cover the elements of a research title while staying coherent.
- Reviewing a sample structure helps you see:
-
The process to get to a good thematic structure
- The process is iterative and often messy—you start with provisional themes and refine them as you learn more from the literature.
- You should anticipate that:
- some provisional themes will be removed,
- new themes will be added,
- themes may be consolidated or split.
Method / step-by-step instructions
1) Identify provisional themes (start with your research title)
- Emphasize provisional: these may change before the final version.
- Use your research title as a “roadmap” to anticipate themes and concepts.
- Do an exercise:
- Write down your title.
- Spend ~30 minutes brainstorming around it.
- Ask what concepts behind the words might shape your literature structure.
- Produce early theme drafts by:
- picking keywords / key phrases from the title,
- writing a short description of what each theme would include.
- Example pattern (from the subtitles):
- Theme 1 could cover the population/context (e.g., where people are from, identity, belonging).
- Theme 2 could cover the phenomenon (e.g., discrimination).
- Theme 3 could cover the lens (e.g., experiences/narratives and impacts).
2) Do a theme-by-theme literature search (stay focused)
- Search using keywords and key phrases derived from one theme at a time.
- Recommended approach:
- Use Google Scholar (or your platform of choice).
- Handle only one theme at the start to avoid overwhelm.
- For each theme:
- Scan results.
- Select 5 to 10 items of literature relevant to that theme.
- Read critically and take notes.
- Strong caution:
- Don’t search across multiple themes simultaneously early on, because it dilutes attention and slows progress.
3) Accept and manage messiness while developing the review
- The thematic structure will not stay neat while you read and develop it.
- You should allow changes, including:
- adding new headings/themes you discover in the literature,
- removing provisional themes that prove irrelevant,
- consolidating overlapping topics,
- splitting overly broad topics into two or three themes.
- Guidance/lesson:
- Don’t try to constrain the work too early into exactly 3–5 themes.
- Treat mess as normal and productive—described as “mess equals progress.”
4) Regularly revisit the developing draft
- Don’t leave the messy, developing literature review alone for long.
- Recommended habit:
- Revisit frequently, even if only briefly each week.
- Why:
- You may forget your decisions (what to include, how you organized it).
- You avoid having to “backtrack” and re-orient yourself.
5) Get feedback early
- Don’t wait to share until the review is “finished.”
- Share early drafts/ideas to:
- write faster,
- reduce pain/friction,
- get fresh perspectives,
- receive suggestions for improvement,
- clarify what needs explanation.
Sources / speakers featured
- Dr. Elizabeth Yardley (speaker; author/creator of a step-by-step PDF guide and related video content referenced in the subtitles)