How to do consensus decision making

Key consensus decision-making process (wellness-adjacent: reduces friction, improves inclusion)

Stage 1: Introduce the issue + relevant context

• Start the meeting by clearly stating the problem and sharing necessary information so everyone is aligned on what’s being discussed.

Stage 2: “Voice” needs, hopes, concerns

• Invite everyone to share what they want/need and any hopes or concerns.
• This helps make later proposals more acceptable and reduces surprises.

Stage 3: Broad discussion of ideas (including disagreement)

• Explore ideas openly, including pros and cons.
• Actively encourage people to speak up if they disagree—even if it feels hard or frustrating.

Stage 4: Find common ground and form an initial proposal

• Combine ideas that overlap into a proposal that could be acceptable to everyone.

Stage 5: Discuss and adjust the proposal

• Review the proposal, address concerns, and refine it until it better fits the group.

Stage 6: Clearly state the proposal + check for agreement

• Restate the proposal clearly.
• Silence is not consent—use explicit agreement checking.

---

Agreement-check methods (how to handle blocks/concerns)

Use these signals to determine whether you truly have consensus:

• Block: “I have a fundamental disagreement with the core of the proposal… I won’t implement it.”
• Stand aside: “I can’t support it, but I don’t want to stop you.”
• Reservations: “I have problems with it, but I’ll go along with it.”
• Agreement: “I support the proposal and am willing to implement it.”
• No blocks/too many stand-asides + visible agreement → indicates consensus.

If consensus isn’t clear

• Go back to the reasons behind blocks or stand-asides.
• Sometimes fix with an amendment.
• Other times return to earlier discussion stages to build a new proposal.

---

Productivity / group effectiveness takeaway

This structured approach improves outcomes by:

• ensuring shared understanding early,
• surfacing concerns before proposals harden,
• treating disagreement as necessary input,
• and requiring explicit consensus signals rather than assuming.

---

Presenters / sources

• Seeds for Change (seedsforchange.org) (source for related written resources / next video link)