Salon Crébillon - Eugene Green présente "Les atticistes" - Qobuz.com

Summary of the video (artistic/cultural focus)

The video is a salon-style discussion welcoming Eugène Green to present and contextualize his forthcoming novel Les Atticistes (released the next day). Green explains how the book uses historical rhetorical categories—“Atticism” vs “Asianism”—as competing philosophies of language, thought, and cultural “taste,” and then satirizes how both positions ultimately enforce social power through words.

He connects these ideas to his broader artistic practice: decades of work reviving Baroque theatre (acting, staging, gesture, lighting) alongside parallel work in cinema and writing. Green also links past artistic controversies—especially opposition to his Baroque approach—to deeper ideological conflicts in France (tradition vs. progress; reason vs. the sacred/intelligence; transmission vs. “awakening”).

A major narrative device discussed is that the novel follows characters across a long timeline and culminates in a symbolic “common ground” via Baroque theatre. Yet the argument is that the true conflict is not merely political: it is between “intelligence” (organic, sacred-rooted understanding) and “reason” (abstract, vacuum-like rationality).

He further describes an invented youth group in a housing-project setting. They create an “Academy of the Sensitive” and perform a baroque pastoral improvisation using localized dialect and linguistic creativity (Frenchifying/inflecting borrowed words) to model how language can evolve.

Green expands from the novel’s themes to wider cultural commentary: the enduring influence of Voltaire’s cultural ideology and Jesuit intellectual methods; the French habit of ideological “party wars” within salon culture; and the role of language in shaping open (or closed) collective identity. He also discusses “grace” through a Pascalian lens and frames Baroque as an “oxymoron”: holding two “contradictory” truths together.

---

Artistic techniques, concepts, and creative processes shown/discussed

1) Using rhetorical doctrine as a narrative engine

• The novel’s central antagonism is built from classical rhetorical terms:
  • Atticism: restrained, concise expression; refusal of elaborate metaphors.
  • Asianism: ornate, embellished, image-rich style.
• Green reinterprets these as living ideological attitudes (not just writing style), making them characters’ worldviews about how language should function and who has authority to define it.

2) Satire built on character opposition that ultimately converges

• Two main characters:
  • One aligned with Atticism (portrayed as traditional/conservative).
  • One aligned with Asianism (portrayed as progressive/revolutionary).
• Despite the opposition, Green argues their foundations are similar: both are rooted in reason rather than intelligence, so they agree more than they appear to.

3) Theatre revival as a living artistic method (Baroque staging)

Green emphasizes his long-term Baroque theatre practice as an artistic approach, including work on:

• staging
• gesture
• text
• lighting

He frames Baroque theatre as not merely historical reconstruction, but as an “opening” into theatre’s deeper nature—capable of resisting contemporary expectations.

4) Integrating cinema and theatre into the same aesthetic worldview

• Green describes his films as extensions of his theatrical work—continuing the same research into how performance, language, and presentation create meaning.

5) Linguistic creativity as performance (baroque pastoral improvisation)

In the novel’s youth subplot:

• Young people form an “academy” and practice an improvisation shaped as a heroic pastoral.
• They:
  • Use specific local dialect words (from the Montreuil/Sub-Saharan Roma-related linguistic layer described).
  • Perform using baroque pastoral conventions.

Green contrasts two attitudes to language:

• Regulation/hostage (preventing evolution).
• Naturalizing (adapting words to grammar so they become living verbs, allowing the language to “breathe”).

6) “Baroque oxymoron” as a worldview for art

Green presents a theory of Baroque:

• Baroque is an oxymoron: it holds two truths together that reason deems contradictory.
• Art becomes a way to sustain that contradiction rather than resolve it into one “absolute” rational truth.

7) Cultural critique through historical analogy

• Green uses France’s ideological climate (Voltaire vs. “foreign bad taste,” and reactions around Baroque) as a satirical scaffold.
• He argues that ideologies persist through time via education, institutions, and control of language.

---

Featured creators / contributors (mentioned)

• Eugène Green (speaker/author; referenced alongside his film and theatre work)
• Voltaire
• Quintilian (referenced via continuity with Latin rhetoric; mentioned as “Quillian/Quintilian”)
• Corneille, Racine
• Aristotle
• Pascal
• Simon Caractofel (fictional/semiological mentor character in the novel’s described plot)
• Jean d’Arc
• Hugo Ren (announced for the next salon event; flautist and oboist)
• La Salon Crébillon / Paris Baroque Festival (institutions/events mentioned)
• Laurence Plasenet (novelist; specialist on Port-Royal mentioned as an external authority)

(No other real-world film/cast/crew credits are provided in the subtitles beyond Green and Hugo Ren.)