The Only Trading Strategy You Need To Be Profitable | Swing Trading

What the speaker claims swing trading is / how it differs

• Swing trading is trading held past one day, typically around a week.
• The speaker frames it as using higher timeframes (weekly/daily) to capture larger price moves.
• The process is described as “set and forget”:
  1. Identify trade levels (higher-timeframe zones),
  2. Set stop-loss (SL) and take-profit (TP),
  3. Monitor occasionally until TP or SL is hit.

Comparison to other styles

• Scalping

  • Entries/exits within minutes to a couple hours (often 1–3 hours).
  • Described as more likely to result in traders being stopped out due to aggressiveness.

• Day trading

  • In/out within the same day.
  • Often uses 4-hour to daily structure.
  • Profits are taken within the day.

• Swing trading (speaker’s preferred approach)

  • Identify trend on weekly/daily.
  • Use lower intraday timeframes (4H/2H/1H) for entry precision.
  • Use higher timeframe structure for larger TP targets.

---

Speaker’s framework / step-by-step

1. Trend alignment across timeframes

   • Determine trend direction on:
     • Weekly (bearish/bullish)
     • Daily
     • 4-hour
   • Recommendation: trade only in the direction of the majority trend.
     • Example rule stated: if weekly/daily/4H are bearish, then only look to sell, and avoid buying on lower timeframes (e.g., 1H/15min/38min).

2. Choose an “Area of Interest” (supply/demand zone)

   • Must have a minimum of 3 touches to be considered a solid zone.
   • Rule stated:
     • Above the zone → buy (general logic)
     • Under the zone → sell

3. Grade the setup (confidence scoring)

   • Assign 10% grade per timeframe when aligned.
   • Example:
     • If weekly/daily/4H align for a sell/buy at a daily/weekly area of interest → 30%.
     • Adding confluence can bring it to 40% (described as adding “a 10 to my grade”).
   • Stated preference:
     • Avoid trades below A–C; “C plus anything makes no sense” (their phrasing).

4. Entry confluence on lower timeframes

   • When price reaches the area of interest, wait for confirmation such as:
     • EMA rejection
     • Structure rejection
     • Bearish engulfing (entry example on 1H, with mention of 30-minute bearish engulfing)
     • Head and Shoulders pattern (example referenced)

5. Stop-loss placement

   • Often placed above the right shoulder for a left-head-right-shoulders structure.
   • Example notes a tighter stop-loss due to strong confirmation and timing around London/New York.

6. Take-profit placement

   • TP is based on the next daily structure point / daily zone, not on lower intraday targets.
   • Avoid “wrong psychological levels” where price may react differently (example references a specific level that was tapped).

7. Time window / session note

   • Wait for London or New York session momentum.
   • Example entry timed around 8:00 AM (described as tied to New York momentum).

---

Key numbers / explicit performance claims & risk framing

• Performance claim

  • Speaker says they made $85,000 in under 24 hours in a demonstrated trade.

• Example trade time to play out

  • “Six to eight hours” (described as relatively fast).

• Risk/reward expectations

  • Requires at least “1 to 3 risk to reward.”
  • Strategy described as positive if trades achieve 1:1+ / 1–3 R:R (their phrasing: “positive all day” when it’s one to three risk to reward).
  • Mentions the need for minimum upside; “anything more would be great.”

• Psychological level mentioned

  • Target near 8,900 (described as a psychological level).

• Take-profit execution detail

  • The trade was reportedly closed not exactly at the precise TP due to execution/spread, ending up profitably “somewhere around here” (TP distance not precisely stated).

• Position monitoring

  • Claims you can work/leave the screen and just check occasionally because SL/TP will trigger.

---

Markets / tickers / instruments

• No specific tickers, ETFs, stocks, bonds, commodities, forex pairs, or crypto assets are named in the provided subtitles.
• The example references:
  • price action,
  • EMAs,
  • structure,
  • and a psychological level around 8,900,
  • but the underlying instrument is not identified.

---

Disclosures / disclaimers

• No explicit “not financial advice” disclaimer appears in the provided subtitles.

---

Presenters / sources mentioned

• No named presenters are identified.
• The only source referenced is a “Google definition” of trading (used to contrast trade duration).