Жириновский предсказал ТРЕТЬЮ МИРОВУЮ на 2027 год. Вот что он говорил

Overview

The video discusses how Vladimir Zhirinovsky’s older statements are being rewatched and reinterpreted online—especially his claim that a “third world war” could unfold around 2027. While the subtitles note that the exact chronology may not match, the video argues that the conflict “pattern” he described resembles later developments: a strike on Iran, a counterattack, NATO/alliance involvement, and an economic shock.

Core predictions and reasoning highlighted

• Diplomacy gives way to force (2027 target): Zhirinovsky allegedly said diplomacy would fail and unresolved contradictions would be handled through military power.
• A new type of weapon, not “just nukes”: He supposedly rejected the idea of a straightforward nuclear exchange as the defining outcome. Instead, he described a “superweapon” concept—intended to surpass existing nuclear charges—and emphasized civilization’s fragility due to reliance on energy, logistics, and communications.
• Civilizational collapse via infrastructure and speed: The video recounts his claim that parts of the planet could be destroyed quickly and “quietly,” suggesting mass destruction would come through systemic disruption rather than dramatic battlefield exchanges.
• Small states as likely casualties: He reportedly warned that small European countries in southern Europe could effectively “disappear” after attacks—framed as especially concerning given Middle East-related escalation.

• Middle East mechanism (2013–2017 speeches):

  • Israel initiates by striking Iran’s nuclear facilities
  • Iran responds
  • After the first exchange, the United States mobilizes NATO and escalates with major bombing against Iran The video emphasizes a cynical rationale: not “democracy,” but control of energy and weakening rivals, particularly China, via an oil-price shock.

• Economic logic aimed at China and Europe: The chain-of-events claim includes oil prices rising to $200/barrel, harming both China and the EU and weakening China without direct war.

• Power vacuum and Europe/US weakness:

  • The US is portrayed as losing hegemonic strength
  • Europe is described as “aging” and running out of time to act
  • China is presented as avoiding hegemonic responsibility to avoid becoming trapped in others’ conflicts Together, these factors allegedly create conditions for a major war.

• Consequences for Russia—especially migration: The video focuses on an alleged forecast that bombing Iran triggers large-scale displacement northward through the Caucasus, destabilizing Russia’s southern borders, with potential collapse spreading toward the North Caucasus and up to the Rostov-on-Don region.

• 2027–2030 as a global “turning point”: The video adds that Zhirinovsky described 2027–2030 as a period of redistributed global influence, with Russia positioned to gain advantages.
• Nuclear use allegedly not required: It states Zhirinovsky claimed nuclear weapons would not be used; decisive factors would be strikes on enemy infrastructure and weapon systems sufficient to dismantle a state without nuclear escalation.
• Geopolitical end state: He allegedly predicted a world where Russia and the US dominate, while Europe becomes dependent on both centers of power.

“Third World War” trigger: cyber/satellite disruption

The video highlights a separate circulating quote: the war begins not with artillery, but with an attack on satellite infrastructure, causing loss of navigation, troop awareness, and communication. This is framed as a modern, “communications-first” style of conflict. It notes that military analysts discuss similar ideas even without relying on specific dates.

How the “2027” date spreads beyond politics

The subtitles claim 2027 became a broader cultural focus through unrelated events:

• Alla Pugacheva: reportedly said, “Let’s live until 2027.”
• Stephen Baldwin / Jim Carrey viral video: “Now I have your attention” followed by 2027 on screen.

The video interprets these unrelated references as contributing to a collective sense of convergence around the year.

Context and skepticism included

• The video explicitly says there is no credible basis to claim a world war will definitely begin in 2027—no one can accurately date a global conflict from trends alone.
• It argues Zhirinovsky’s value lies less in acting as a “schedule” and more as a prompt to examine systemic risks: alliances, regional crises, resource competition, and unmanned technologies.
• It also claims some predictions may have been rhetorical, with only the “matching” fragments spreading after his death in 2022.

Additional archival claim (Ukraine “special military operation” timeline)

The video mentions a less-discussed forecast: Zhirinovsky suggested the “special military operation” could end as early as 2026, preceding his broader “turning point” timeframe for a major global conflict.

Present-day relevance framing

Finally, the video argues that even if the timing is uncertain, current developments—especially Israel striking targets in Iran and Syria, persistent regional tension, and NATO strengthening its eastern flank—make the scenario feel “frighteningly relevant” due to structural similarities.

Presenters or contributors (as mentioned)

• Dmitry Smirnov (Kremlin pool journalist; mentioned for reposting archived Zhirinovsky content on Telegram)
• Alla Pugacheva (mentioned via a reported “2027” remark)
• Jim Carrey (mentioned through the viral Baldwin video)
• Stephen Baldwin (mentioned through the viral video)
• Jeffrey Epstein (referenced only indirectly through US DOJ document mentions involving Zhirinovsky’s name)
• US Department of Justice (referenced as releasing documents where his name appears)
• Moskovsky Komsomolets (mentioned as having republished a quote)
• Iria News (mentioned as having republished a quote)
• Jeffrey Epstein documents and associated court material (indirect source, not a presenter)