Video summary
Best & Worst Freelancing Platforms of 2024 (upwork, fiverr, peopleperhour, toptal, guru, etc)
Main summary
Key takeaways
Product(s) reviewed
Freelancing platforms (multiple): Upwork, PeoplePerHour, (BRB / “Bribes” — unclear spelling), Fiverr, Toptal, Freelancer.com, Guru, Ripple, Contra, FlexJobs.
The video is a “best & worst” roundup rather than a review of a single product.
Key points by platform (unique features, pros/cons, UX, comparisons, verdict)
1) Upwork
Pros
- Lots of active clients (about 150,000 active core clients mentioned).
- Huge job diversity (from design gigs to legal-type work).
- Good for finding work when you have a relevant skill.
Cons
- Extremely competitive (18 million other freelancers mentioned).
- Confusing/expensive bidding system; requires buying “connects” to apply.
- Platform takes a flat 10% fee on earnings (described as “too high” by the reviewer).
- Feels cramped/overcrowded—“musical chairs”-like.
User experience
- Reviewer refreshed job posts every ~10 minutes and applied quickly to win early clients.
Overall recommendation (in-video)
- Tier placement: tier three
- Best framed as useful early on, less useful once you’re no longer a beginner.
2) PeoplePerHour
Pros
- Very large market (“over a million clients”).
- Long-running platform (since ~2007).
Cons
- Heavy fees and complex fee rules.
- High competition (approx 3 million freelancers mentioned).
- Customer service contact described as a “huge headache.”
Fees mentioned (confusing / variable)
- 20% on amounts below £250
- 7.5% on £250–£5,000
- 3.5% on amounts above £5,000
- Fees described as per buyer, meaning new clients start with the higher fee band.
Verdict
- Tier: tier five
- Likely to leave freelancers unhappy due to heavy fees + competition.
3) BRB / “Bribes” (new influencer marketplace; spelling unclear)
Pros
- Niche market for influencers; marketplace resembles Fiverr (set price, clients browse).
- Nice UI / easy navigation.
Cons
- Lack of clients: reviewer couldn’t find hard numbers, but saw many profiles with zero reviews.
- Weird/variable fees:
- No fees for first three (?) listings/projects
- No fees for projects under $30
- After that: fees range down from 25% to ~8% depending on volume (“beers sold”—unclear wording)
Verdict
- Tier: tier four
- Recommended for influencers, but not for general freelancers.
4) Fiverr
Pros
- Large buyer base (“more than 5 million yearly buyers”).
- Easy to browse services (simple discovery for clients).
- Strong structure for beginners: packages (not just hourly), clarifying deliverables.
- Reviewer prefers this over hourly/retainer uncertainty for first hires.
Cons
- Competitive; tends to push lower rates.
- “Name-brand expectation” problem: clients may assume very low pricing (“Picasso for five dollars”).
- Very high fees: 20% of everything you make including tips.
Verdict
- Tier: tier three
- Good to get started or for occasional work, but reviewer expects most freelancers to move on as they level up.
5) Toptal
Pros
- High average rates cited: about $80/hour.
- Client seriousness signal: requires a $500 deposit.
- “High quality clients” and acceptance of only a small portion of applicants.
Cons
- Exclusive acceptance: only ~3% accepted (reviewer frames it as great if you get accepted; otherwise not).
- Job types are limited, focused mainly on business/design/tech.
- No fees for freelancers mentioned (called out as a pro).
Verdict
- Tier: tier two
- Strong for qualified/semi-elite freelancers who can get accepted.
6) Freelancer.com
Pros
- Enormous supply/demand: 67 million users and 22 million jobs.
- Diverse job types.
Cons
- Heavy competition.
- Notable unusual feature: contest-style jobs where only one person gets paid, while others submit finished work without guaranteed payment.
- Fees are 10% but variable by job type; reviewer couldn’t easily parse the fee logic.
User experience
- Reviewer suggests reading guidelines carefully due to complexity.
Verdict
- Tier: tier three
- Suggested for beginners practicing via contests; not recommended for established freelancers who require paid work 100% of the time.
7) Guru
Pros
- Better freelancer-to-job ratio than some other platforms.
Cons
- Subscription model + commission (reviewer calls it gatekeeping/predatory).
- Gatekeeping simple features: asking clients questions before taking a job is restricted unless you pay.
- Bad UI / aesthetics.
- Fees: start at 9%, drop to 5% with the most expensive subscription.
- Reviewer says it’s subscription OR commission, but also implies both are involved (“why not both”).
Verdict
- Tier: tier five
- “Worst aesthetics” and “don’t use this” overall.
8) Ripple
Pros
- No fees for freelancers.
- Vetted/exclusive marketplace: positioned as qualified opportunities sourced by the platform.
- Less competition because you must apply to get access.
Cons
- Fewer clients/opportunities due to exclusivity.
- Must be accepted into the platform (may not happen).
Verdict
- Tier: tier four
- Niche recommendation for semi-experienced marketing freelancers; otherwise questionable value.
9) Contra
Pros
- No fees and no commissions for freelancers.
- Freelancer protections:
- Dispute system with human oversight (not auto-sided with clients).
- Community benefits (Slack), including portfolio reviews mentioned.
- Minimum pricing:
- Requires at least $25/hour (and flat rates minimum $250).
- Reviewer believes this reduces “bargain hunting” clients.
Cons
- Newer platform → fewer numbers/less volume than big incumbents.
- Some functionality requires subscription only for an optional fancy portfolio site (free membership still provides a personal page and projects).
Verdict
- Tier: tier one
- Reviewer is extremely positive (“everyone sign up immediately”) with “no downsides” sentiment in the video.
10) FlexJobs
Pros
- Job diversity and human-vetted job postings (reviewer likes the curation).
Cons
- Not as many freelance jobs.
- No free version.
- Subscription cost starts at $10/week.
- Reviewer argues general freelancers may not get enough value if they’re constantly searching for clients.
Verdict
- Tier: tier five
- Possible value only if you’re hunting for remote/part-time positions more intensively.
Overall comparisons / recurring themes across platforms
- Big marketplaces (Upwork/Fiverr/Freelancer.com): lots of jobs, but high competition and/or fee burden.
- Fee-heavy / confusing fee systems (PeoplePerHour, Guru, Fiverr): repeatedly criticized for complexity or large take rates.
- Exclusive/vetted marketplaces (Toptal, Ripple, Contra): fewer clients/opportunities but better client seriousness and/or better freelancer economics.
Main pros & cons (cross-platform)
Most praised
- Low/no fees (Contra, Ripple; Toptal described as fee-free).
- Quality controls / vetting / seriousness signals
- Toptal’s $500 deposit
- Ripple vetted opportunities
- Contra protections and pricing floors
Most criticized
- Fee magnitude and/or complexity
- Fiverr 20% incl. tips
- PeoplePerHour variable confusing fees
- Guru subscription + commission
- Upwork connects
- Gatekeeping / UX friction
- Guru subscription gates features
- Upwork bidding applies friction
- reviewer calls some sites cramped or confusing
- Incentive mismatch
- contests where only one winner gets paid (Freelancer.com)
- avoiding bargain clients via Contra’s pricing minimums
Overall recommendations (concise verdict)
- Top pick: Contra (Tier 1) — best balance of no fees, protections, and minimum pricing to avoid bargain clients.
- Strong alternative (if you can get in): Toptal (Tier 2) — high rates + client deposits + very selective acceptance.
- If you’re new / testing: Upwork / Fiverr / Freelancer.com (Tier 3) — good volume but expect competition and fees; Freelancer.com contests are mainly for practice.
- Avoid (Tier 5): Guru, PeoplePerHour, FlexJobs — due to subscription/fee issues and poor value (per reviewer).
- Niche options (Tier 4): Ripple (marketing-focused, vetted) and the BRB/“Bribes” influencer marketplace (best for influencers, not general freelancers).
Reviewer’s strategy for using platforms (from the video)
- Choose max 2 platforms
- Apply/outreach using a weekly system for 2–3 months
- Don’t use them randomly—otherwise you’ll get overwhelmed and see no results.
Speakers / perspectives
- Single primary narrator/reviewer throughout; no distinct multiple speakers clearly identified in subtitles.
- Occasional self-contrast statements provide “different views” (e.g., Upwork being great for beginners but not after; FlexJobs possibly being worth it for specific remote job seekers).