Aula com o Professor - Estrat�gias de Negocia��o - FLD6819756CSA

Business / Strategy Takeaways (Negotiation Strategies Course)

Core concept: negotiation is a communication process to reach mutual agreement

• Negotiation is defined as a two-way communication process to reach mutual agreement on divergent interests.
• Persuasion without force: true negotiation seeks consent (e.g., “sign spontaneously”), not coercion.

“Conflict → negotiation” and why it matters operationally

• Conflict is natural; negotiation is the mechanism to resolve it with:
  • Lower costs
  • Greater speed
• Negotiation appears across real-world settings such as politics, unions, banking, corporate life, and even everyday personal scenarios.

---

Frameworks / Playbooks Mentioned

Negotiation Triad (Power, Time, Information)

A strong negotiation requires mastering at least two of the following three variables:

• Power: ability to make one’s will prevail through arguments, conditions, etc.
• Time: deadlines/limits that create pressure and often lead to worse concessions under time pressure.
• Information: never negotiate without knowing:
  • who you’re negotiating with
  • what (product/contract/issues)
  • enough facts to challenge and justify your choices

5 Bases of Power (França & Raven)

Leverage in negotiation can come from:

• Reward power: exchanging something valued for desired behavior.
• Coercive power: negative consequences for non-compliance.
• Legitimate power: formal authority recognized by an institution.
• Referent power: influence through admiration/identification (social influence).
• Expert power: credibility based on technical knowledge/experience.

Types of negotiation + expected outcomes

• Integrative negotiation (win-win): both parties create and share value.
  • Example logic: exchanging land for an apartment where each side values different assets.
• Distributive negotiation: “one wins, the other loses,” often leaving the other with “crumbs.”

Four possible outcomes

• Win-win
• Win-lose
• Lose-lose (everyone loses)
• No agreement (negotiation fails/stops)

Creative negotiation

• Happens when parties reveal interests early and develop innovative solutions beyond conventional “win-win.”
• Example mentioned: coordinated negotiation for exporting açaí, requiring cooperation among government and stakeholders to enable the deal.

Negotiator styles (diagnostic / self-awareness)

Four styles are introduced—there’s no universally “best” style:

• Catalyst: creative, sensitive to praise; can become superficial.
• Controller: task/result-focused; people come second.
• Supportive: relationship-oriented; avoids conflict; prioritizes group well-being.
• Analytical: detail/security-focused; seeks necessary information before committing.

Action emphasis: build self-awareness by reviewing past negotiations to identify your dominant style and adapt it to the context.

---

Concrete Business Examples / Cases Used

• Union salary negotiation

  • Baseline salary: R$ 3,200
  • Adjustment rate decided in a general assembly

• Health insurance reimbursement dispute (stent procedure)

  • Illustrates bargaining vs. negotiation when one side holds critical leverage (e.g., urgency + authorization + payment requirements).

• Market competition example (açaí shops / pharmacies)

  • Customers can easily compare prices; differentiation shifts to service, quality, and delivery.
  • Reinforces the value of negotiation and relationship maintenance in crowded markets.

• Export deal example (açaí to Dubai)

  • Demonstrates creative negotiation requiring stakeholder alignment (exporter + government bodies + inter-ministry coordination).

---

Actionable Recommendations (Behavioral / Operational)

• Prepare before the table
  • Make sure you have information about the counterpart and the contract/product.
• Avoid time-pressure traps
  • Negotiating under heavy deadlines tends to produce unfavorable concessions.
• Shift from bargaining to negotiation
  • If parties are interdependent → negotiation.
  • If only one side depends on the other → more like “bargaining” (with pejorative implications).
• Aim for shared value
  • If you try to “win alone,” the broader chain (supplier–client–collaborators) weakens and can backfire.
• Use the power toolkit
  • Identify which base of power you can legitimately leverage:
    • reward / coercive / legitimate / referent / expert

---

Course Operations (How the Learning Is Structured)

No business KPIs (revenue/CAC/LTV/churn) were provided in this segment, but the video includes an execution model for students:

• 4 classes total, all Mondays:
  • Sep 14 (today)
  • Sep 21
  • Sep 28
  • Oct 5
• Flipped classroom approach
  • Read/watch materials at home
  • Use class time for discussion, debates, and Q&A
• Professional challenge broken into three reading stages:
  1. General overview (understand what the challenge addresses)
  2. Analytical reading (extract main points; create a checklist)
  3. More organized/refined reading after key topics are shared
• Assessment calendar mentioned
  • AV1 first assessment exam on Aug 21 (as referenced in subtitle context)

---

Presenters / Sources

• Professor Aline: facilitator (course logistics + announcements)
• Professor Angélica Carina: teaches Negotiation Strategies (main instructional content)
• Professor Aline / Professor Angélica reference authors:
  • França & Raven (for the “5 bases of power”)

Mentioned external sources (as examples/news context)

• Federal Police (investigation context)
• Estadão (contacting lawyers)
• Globo Rural (açaí export negotiation example)
• Public Prosecutor’s Office (reference via influencer example: Virginia Fonseca)