Delete Voter নিয়ে চরম হেনস্তা করল জীবন বরবাদ Adv.Firdous Shamin বিস্তারিত|Sir Delete Voter Tribunal

Main points / arguments in the video

• NEET-related nationwide unrest and court intervention: The speaker refers to the release of NEET results and the widespread protests/unrest that followed allegations around the exam. They claim the Union Education Minister resigned due to the protests. The speaker also says the Supreme Court issued interim orders, including:

  • Bail for students with no criminal antecedents
  • Preservation of CCTV/body-cam footage for investigation

• Central allegation: mass voter-name deletions affecting NEET admissions: The video focuses on a case where a student’s voter list entry was deleted shortly after being added. The speaker argues this deletion is wrong, systematic, and effectively blocks benefits, especially domicile-related documents required for admissions/counselling in medical colleges.

Case description (as narrated)

• A student named Mahabul Mollah (the speaker uses this name while addressing the affected person) says his name was added to the voter list in 2026, but deleted within 5–6 days.
• The reason given (as reflected in the subtitles) is that the deletion was based on suspicion about family/parentage records—i.e., that multiple claims appear connected to the father/grandfather, creating a “false connection” impression.
• The speaker claims the student is eligible for NEET admission and that the deletion was done without valid legal basis, causing stress and delays around counselling.

Extent of the alleged problem

• The speaker claims very high deletion rates in certain booths, citing figures like 90% and in some places 100%.
• They state that names (including BLO-related entries, as referenced by the subtitles) were removed in large numbers.
• They also claim these deletions prevent issuance/renewal of key civic/identity documents such as domicile.

Appeal to officials and legal stance

• The speaker urges authorities to ensure that students are not deprived of civic privileges and admission-related rights due to these errors.
• They argue that if the voter-list deletion occurred by mistake, it should not result in loss of benefits.
• The speaker insists that such deletion/denial is illegal, and that documents (domicile/civic facilities/admission eligibility) must be granted or corrected.
• They particularly tell affected people to push for domicile certificates and ensure their documents are not withheld due to the voter-list error.

Direct takeaway for affected students

NEET counselling/admission cannot be legitimately stopped due to an incorrect voter-list deletion, and domicile certificate issues should be resolved for eligible students.

Presenters / contributors

• Adv. Firdous Shamin (speaker/host)