Video summary
Дизайнеры ВАМ ВРУТ. 10 трендов ремонта, которые НЕЛЬЗЯ делать у себя дома
Main summary
Key takeaways
Overview
Designers note that many renovation “looks expensive and modern” in photos, but in real apartments they avoid options that are either hard to maintain, overly costly, or inconvenient day-to-day. Below are key “do not do” renovation/trend points.
Avoid / Don’t Choose These Renovation Ideas
1) Faucets in black / chrome / white finishes
Problem: water stains, rust marks, and fingerprints are difficult to keep clean. Even “matte chrome” and “blued steel” are discussed as more stain-resistant, but glossy high-maintenance variants are strongly avoided.
2) Colored toilets
Main issue: if a part breaks (e.g., lid), matching the exact color later becomes difficult. Preferred:
- White toilet + white lid, or
- All-black (described as more “for amateurs”).
3) Freestanding bathtubs (especially in small bathrooms)
Problem: the shower setup becomes awkward—there’s often no convenient place for the shower head, everything gets wet, and cleaning is inconvenient. Better alternatives:
- Built-in bathtub with tiled partitions on three sides, or
- Bathtubs placed against one wall with a closed enclosure to prevent water/dirt spread.
4) A separate bidet / “separate bowl”
Seen as irrational because it:
- takes up bathroom space, and
- requires extra plumbing (sewer + hot/cold water + installation).
Preferred:
- a toilet with bidet function, or
- a hygienic shower, unless someone is already used to a separate device.
5) Hidden flush / frameless mounting “door” systems (“doors without trims”)
Downsides:
- Very expensive: door structure + installation; said to be about 1.5× regular doors.
- Extra cost for movers/builders (~15,000 per design, mentioned).
- Wear issue: quickly degrades around the handle area.
6) Very tall interior doors (~2m or higher)
Designers generally avoid this (the speaker says they don’t know the reason). Even for high-ceiling apartments, designers wouldn’t use this height for interiors—though the speaker personally thinks it’s mostly taste.
7) Push-to-open mechanisms on most furniture
Problems:
- hard to remember which side to press (“hell/quest”),
- fast showing of fingerprints/smudges/dirt,
- possible false alarms/noisy triggering over time,
- can start working poorly.
Preferred alternatives:
- external handles, head profiles, milled handles. For upper drawers: slightly larger/elongated fronts as a grip instead of push-to-open.
8) Very large floor tile formats
Defined as anything larger than ~160 cm on the long side. Criticism: major overpayment for an “imaginary result.” Logistics/installation/cutting: complicated, and then fixtures force everything to be segmented.
More practical large formats suggested:
- 120×60 or 160×80 porcelain stoneware (speaker says these cover most needs).
9) Plasterboard ceilings
Presented as the “most expensive” option with no real advantage besides “strength.” Also very time-consuming: for a larger apartment (~100 m²), the speaker claims it can take around 4 months.
10) Quartz-vinyl flooring (SPC or LVT), especially floating installation
Strongly discouraged:
- material described as too thin,
- speaker says SPC should never be laid on locks or on backing; suggests gluing would be the only acceptable approach (if choosing it at all).
Preferred alternatives:
- laminate, parquet, or engineered board (and if budget allows, parquet/engineered installed on glue). Otherwise: tiles.
11) Plastic window sills
Strongly avoided. Alternatives listed:
- porcelain stoneware (large-format or regular),
- acrylic stone/artificial stone,
- expensive quartz agglomerates,
- various complex stone designs.
12) “Paintable walls” approach
The speaker initially assumes designers like paintable walls, but the practical guidance is mainly about cost, durability, and prep. Options mentioned:
- paintable wallpaper, or
- wallpaper + high-quality decorative panels, or
- decorate zones using durable materials (e.g., large-format porcelain tiles in the TV area).
Decorative plaster is also mentioned as even more wear-resistant.
13) Micro/baseboard skirting that only fits glued-floor coverings
Downsides:
- works only with glued floor installation (not laminate floating),
- complex/expensive installation and joint sealing,
- doesn’t protect the lower wall from mechanical damage.
Suggested alternatives:
- classic rigid skirting: ready-made MDF, paintable MDF, or paintable duropolymer.
Shadow skirting skepticism: The speaker argues it mainly hides the expansion gap, but doesn’t truly protect. Since walls are never perfectly straight, rigid profiles can make waviness/cracks more visible after gluing.
14) Overhead (top-mounted) sink on the countertop
Hard to clean due to cleaning-unfriendly geometry:
- small angle (<90°) between sink and countertop makes grime hard to reach,
- even at 90°, strong bends underneath are inconvenient.
Better solutions:
- rounded/integrated podium-style sinks (one-piece look),
- built-in sinks (many varieties).
15) White built-in kitchen appliances
Why avoided:
- limited availability of white; black equipment is widely available,
- color matching problems: different manufacturers (and even different factories within one brand) vary shades of “white,” causing mismatched tones,
- even within the same brand, white parts may differ slightly.
Preferred:
- black equipment, ideally from one brand so indicator/backlight colors match (e.g., oven timer lights vs stove/microwave).
Notable Mentions
- The speaker promotes a Telegram channel for design/renovation information.
- The text mentions hiring/doing renovations via Ontario for high-quality design projects and apartment renovations.
- “Market leaders” for tiles are referenced as covering most needs (brands not named in subtitles).
Rate this summary
Your feedback will help improve summaries.
Improve this summary
Reprocess with a stronger model when the summary feels incomplete or inaccurate.
Translate summary in another language
Ask questions to this video
Chat for follow-up questions, clarifications, and source-backed answers.