Pisah Dengan Gibran, Prabowo Akan Tunjuk Siapa? ft Burhanuddin Muhtadi

Summary

The discussion considers who Prabowo might choose as vice president if Gibran were no longer in the role. Burhanuddin Muhtadi argues that an ideal replacement would need more than political credentials: they should be competent, trusted by Prabowo, and willing to give candid advice—even when it is uncomfortable—without being seen as a rival or a threat.

Muhtadi says Gibran had functioned as a political “bumper,” absorbing some public criticism that might otherwise have landed directly on Prabowo. Without that buffer, dissatisfaction with the government is more likely to be directed at the president. The new vice president should therefore help Prabowo understand public concerns and improve his standing, rather than simply echo his existing views. This would require Prabowo to listen to criticism and reassess policies that are not working.

Muhtadi cites Prabowo’s large electoral and parliamentary support, alongside an exceptionally high early approval rating, which he attributes largely to public expectations rather than a track record in office. He says later declines in approval, reported by several polling organizations, suggest that the public is now judging the government more on performance. Unlike earlier approval-rating recoveries under SBY and Jokowi, he argues, the current decline cannot readily be explained by fuel-price increases and resulting inflation; its causes need to be investigated directly.

The speakers suggest that someone from Gerindra or Prabowo’s inner circle may be more politically feasible than a nominee from another coalition party, who could prompt jealousy or be viewed as a future rival. But proximity alone is not enough: the inner circle must demonstrate the courage to report realities frankly to the president. Names such as Hasyim Djojohadikusumo, Syafrie, Sudaryono, and other Gerindra figures come up as examples in the discussion, not as confirmed choices or endorsements.

The speakers also draw historical and international comparisons. Bobby Kennedy is presented as an example of a trusted adviser who could challenge a president, while the Philippines is discussed as a case where a vice president can have an independent political base and become a source of conflict. This leads to a broader debate about how vice presidents are selected and whether election arrangements encourage useful partnership or political rivalry.

Presenters and contributors: Arie Putra (host); Burhanuddin Muhtadi (guest).