Video summary
TEDxLondon - Ewan McIntosh
Main summary
Key takeaways
Main ideas, concepts, and lessons
-
Problem-solving skills in schools are being built on the wrong assumption
- Many education systems promote problem-based learning, but the speaker argues they often focus on pseudo problems—problems created by teachers or assigned by the curriculum.
- This approach can produce students who solve fake or irrelevant problems instead of becoming people who can find real problems in the world.
-
The missing educational goal: “problem-finders”
- The core claim is that society needs a generation of problem finders—young people who:
- Identify problems that actually matter,
- Work with peers to tackle them,
- Develop the motivation and capability to start solving problems found in their communities and world.
- The core claim is that society needs a generation of problem finders—young people who:
-
Evidence/observations from the speaker’s experiences
- From work in media, venture capitalism, and digital companies:
- The speaker saw ~3,000 ideas/pitches, with only ~30 succeeding, suggesting a very low success rate (~1%) even among highly creative people.
- From teaching and advising perspectives:
- The speaker observed that education systems repeatedly emphasize the wrong part of problem-based learning—focusing on receiving problems rather than finding them.
- From work in media, venture capitalism, and digital companies:
-
Why pseudo-problems are harmful
- Students’ and teachers’ expectations reinforce a model where:
- Teachers provide problems,
- Students respond with work designed to satisfy school tasks,
- The result can be impressive but not meaningful—“ingenious answers to stupid problems that don’t matter.”
- Students’ and teachers’ expectations reinforce a model where:
-
Reframing learning: more learner-driven work
- The speaker advocates:
- Divergent thinking (generating many possible directions/ideas),
- Plus some convergent thinking at the end to refine ideas into real outcomes.
- The learning structure is described as design-thinking-like, with teachers reducing micromanagement so students do more of the intellectual work.
- The speaker advocates:
Methodology / instructional approach (as described)
-
Use a design-thinking-inspired learning flow
-
Teacher immersion phase (before students get a problem)
- The teacher explores and narrows down possible areas of study.
- The teacher selects a set of real problems students could investigate (instead of handing students one pre-made pseudo problem).
-
Student problem acquisition phase
- Students take ownership of the problem (with emphasis on enabling students to find or choose problems).
- Students generate ideas for solutions.
-
Prototyping phase
- Students build or test solutions, such as:
- Writing essays,
- Making films,
- Creating podcasts,
- Publishing blogs.
- Students build or test solutions, such as:
-
Feedback phase
- The teacher provides feedback near the end.
- The speaker criticizes feedback being delayed until exams or being overly dependent on test outcomes.
-
-
Shift responsibility
- The speaker explicitly wants:
- Children doing the hard work of learning, not teachers.
- More divergent thinking in the curriculum, enabled by letting students perform the intellectual labor teachers typically do.
- The speaker explicitly wants:
Example used to illustrate the approach (TEDx with children)
-
A practical implementation with young students
- The speaker shared TED Talks with children in Sunderland (UK).
- The children responded immediately: “We’re doing that.”
-
Key implementation rule
- Teachers were not allowed to “spoon-feed” problems.
- The children created their own TEDx talks by deciding what to focus on.
-
Outcomes / topics
- Children proposed and investigated questions such as:
- Do animals talk?
- Do babies have a secret language?
- Which cancer should be cured first?
- Why do people need to get sick?
- Children proposed and investigated questions such as:
-
What the speaker highlights
- Visible enthusiasm and peer encouragement are presented as evidence of stronger engagement.
Call to action / pledge
- Create a “problem-finding curriculum” at scale
- The speaker proposes a pledge starting this week and before Christmas:
- Engage 10,000 learners in a problem-finding curriculum.
- Support is requested from:
- Teachers,
- School district leaders,
- Politicians.
- The speaker proposes a pledge starting this week and before Christmas:
Closing anecdote (what problem-finding does to people)
- A summer incident illustrates deep ownership
- Inspired by the idea “You give us the problems, and we’ll solve them,” students:
- Began creating and finding problems throughout the school year and into summer vacation.
- When they received a computer to solve problems:
- A child broke into the school during summer to reprogram the computer so it could solve the problems the child had found.
- The speaker interprets this as proof that problem-finding changes people—toward ownership, agency, and persistence.
- Inspired by the idea “You give us the problems, and we’ll solve them,” students:
Speakers / sources featured (explicitly mentioned)
- Ewan McIntosh (TEDx speaker)
- Simon Breakspear (mentioned; referenced as working on finding unsolved problems; also doing a PhD)
- Alan November (educator; described running a community problem-solving class)
- D school (source of the “design thinking kind of structure” reference; i.e., Stanford d.school)