Video summary

DIBOHONGI HONDA..!!! MENGUAK FAKTA KELEBIHAN dan KEKURANGAN NEW HONDA VARIO EVO 160 | Otomotif TV

Main summary

Key takeaways

Product Review

Product reviewed

New Honda Vario Evo 160 (latest Vario 160 generation; tested in Jakarta; ABS highest variant)

Key features mentioned

  • Design changes

    • More sporty/aggressive look.
    • Deck/wing area redesigned to be thinner, which changes rider legroom.

  • Engine / torque tuning

    • SCM mapping increases torque by about 0.2 Nm at lower RPM (13.8 → 14 Nm).
    • Peak power remains 15.2 hp.
    • Weight is listed as +1 kg, with 118 kg mentioned.

  • Daily riding character

    • Strong in stop-and-go traffic.
    • Easy overtakes and easy uphill performance.
    • Power delivery described as: bottom responsive → middle calm → top sharply pulls.

  • Fuel tank & consumption

    • 5.5 L tank
    • Test average: 45.3 km/L, even with aggressive riding.
    • Estimated range: ~250 km.

  • Comfort & smoothness

    • Claimed smooth engine vibration around cruising speeds.
    • Seat/ergonomics still feel very “Vario-like” (young forward lean), but knees/legroom are improved.

  • Suspension setup

    • Front
      • Soft/comfortable at low speeds.
      • Can feel floaty when ridden faster.
      • Not easy to bottom out, but may still thump on sharp impacts.
    • Rear
      • Harsh on bigger speed bumps and deep holes.
      • Comfort-focused tuning; tends to feel worse when riding fast solo.

  • Brakes (ABS variant)

    • Single-channel ABS (front only).
    • Discs: 220 mm front & rear, with a single-piston caliper.
    • ABS has a characteristic snort sound when active.
    • No ABS on the rear.
    • For high-speed riding (>100 km/h), reviewer suggests upgrading to:
      • 260 mm front disc and/or
      • a better caliper for responsiveness.

  • Lighting

    • LEDs, but low beam is very dim (said to be an issue present since earlier Vario generations).
    • High beam helps, but can’t be used constantly.
    • DRL/turn signals/brake lights are fine.
    • Rear light durability concerns → suggested protective accessories.

  • Instrument / speedometer

    • Same basic design as older Vario 160.
    • Small “calculator-like” screen with difficult daytime readability, especially under trees.

  • Smart key & security

    • Even the cheapest and highest variants include smart key + two remotes.
    • Includes alarm (noted as a point versus Yamaha).
    • Potential drawback: if ignition isn’t turned off and you walk away, the bike can stay silent (possible battery drain risk).
    • Theft protection: when the remote is far, the bike can’t be started (remote recognition prevents bypass).

  • Storage / practicality

    • 18 L trunk, with a new cable/holder shape.
    • Helmet fit depends on size/spoiler:
      • Some helmets fit (e.g., KYT closed).
      • An XL full-face with a rear spoiler gets stuck and doesn’t fit.
    • Under-handlebar features: bag hanger, bottle holder, small drawer (fits 600 ml bottle), Type-C outlet.
    • Flat deck storage can carry gallons but only about 2/3 depth, limiting central placement; less spacious than competitors.

  • Build quality & materials

    • Black PP plastic scratches easily; plastics seem thin with uneven gaps.
    • Paint/ABS parts hold up better (a nail scratch test showed no marks).
    • “Carbon motif” (VCH) durability not confirmed yet—long-term assessment needed later.

Performance / measurable points & ratings

  • Top speed claim vs reality

    • Claimed by Honda/AHM: 109 km/h
    • Reviewer results:
      • 127 km/h (digital/speed test)
      • Old Vario 160 tested: 128 km/h
      • GPS/device: 117.5 km/h
    • Conclusion: AHM’s 109 km/h figure is described as misleading, and the Vario 160 is among the fastest in class.

  • Acceleration (class comparison)

    • 0–60 km/h: both under 5 seconds.
      • Vario 160 is slightly behind Yamaha Aerox Alpha Turbo.
    • 0–100 km/h: under 15 seconds
    • 0–402 m: under 19 seconds

  • Fuel consumption

    • Average 45.3 km/L over ~200 km
    • Even with aggressive throttle; calmer riding likely improves further.

  • Seat height

    • 778 mm (stated as unchanged).

Pros (unique strengths mentioned)

  • Strong performance: high top speed (127 km/h test) and fast acceleration; strong daily ride feel.
  • Good fuel economy: 45.3 km/L and about ~250 km range.
  • Improved legroom: thinner wing/deck area improves knee clearance (especially for taller riders).
  • Smart key security with alarm (extra security advantage noted vs Yamaha).
  • Smooth vibration and relaxed cruising feel.

Cons (main drawbacks mentioned)

  • Misleading marketing top speed claim (109 km/h disputed by test results).
  • Rear suspension comfort: harsh on high speed bumps/deep potholes; comfort seekers may want aftermarket.
  • Brakes: for spirited/high-speed riding, stock setup may be barely enough → suggests 260 mm disc / better caliper.
  • Very dim low beam headlight (apparently unchanged from earlier generations) → touring users advised to add lights.
  • Speedometer display: too small/old-fashioned, poor readability in daylight and under trees.
  • Build/material concerns: thin PP plastics, easy scratching, uneven panel gaps → risk of “patchy” look over time.
  • Smart key annoyance: if you forget to turn ignition off and walk away, the bike may remain silent (possible battery drain risk).

Comparisons made with competitors

  • Price comparison

    • ABS top variant price: Rp 31,406,000 OTR Jakarta.
    • Positioned against rivals such as:
      • Yamaha Aerox Alpha (standard variant)
      • “Cyber City” (difference described as slight)
    • Vario 160 is mentioned as more expensive than CBS / CBS Nitro variants.
    • Vario 160 vs Yamaha Lexi is highlighted for being both flat-deck scooters.

  • Performance comparison

    • Acceleration slightly behind Yamaha Aerox Alpha Turbo on 0–60 km/h, though overall still very fast.

  • Technology / security comparison

    • Vario’s alarm is highlighted as not available on Yamaha models (per reviewer).

User experience summary (daily use impression)

  • In Jakarta stop-and-go traffic, it feels powerful and easy to maneuver.
  • Comfort is mixed:
    • Front suspension and engine character are smooth and relaxed.
    • Rear suspension can feel bouncy/harsh over bigger impacts, especially when riding fast or solo.
  • Practicality is strong for daily tasks (Type-C, holders, trunk), but storage depends on:
    • helmet size/spoiler, and
    • the deck being less spacious for large items centered.

Overall verdict / recommendation

Recommended if you prioritize performance + fuel economy + improved knee legroom, but expect compromises in:

  • Lighting (very dim low beam)
  • Rear suspension comfort (likely needs aftermarket for comfort-focused riders)
  • Display/readability (small screen)
  • Materials/build trim (thin plastics and easy scratching)

Best fit: riders who want a fast, economical scooter and don’t mind upgrading lighting and/or suspension for touring comfort.

Speakers / views

  • Single main reviewer voice (no clear separate speakers mentioned in subtitles).

Original video