Video summary

I traded this strategy every day for 3 months and didn't lose once... (full strategy breakdown)

Main summary

Key takeaways

Finance

Claimed performance / proof

  • The speaker claims a 100% win rate and “no losing day in over 3 months,” trading “practically every day.”
  • Timeline referenced:
    • Started count: July 22, 2026
    • August: “no day of losses”
    • As of September 15: still “completely flawless”
  • Withdrawal/payment claims:
    • “Payments from Lucid”
    • “Earned around $40,000 in withdrawals with them alone in the last 30 days”
  • Mentions a funded-account student (“Alan”) with payment history:
    • Apex: first payment $1,500 on 8/4
    • By ~2 weeks later: totals $10,000 from Apex and Blue Sky
    • “Just a couple of days ago”: $5,400 from Lucid plus nine more payments from Apex
    • Total claimed: “over $20,000 in payments in just under 3 weeks”

“Power of Three (PO3)” methodology (framework)

The strategy is described as an institutional liquidity/stop-hunt sequence across timeframes:

  • Power of Three concept
    1. Accumulation: price moves sideways within a range (no clear uptrend/downtrend).
    2. Manipulation: a false institutional breakdown / false break that triggers stop losses (creates liquidity).
    3. Distribution: after stops are hit, price reverses and creates the strongest fastest movement (where trades are taken).

Core trade trigger (when to enter)

Wait for:

  • Sideways accumulation on the higher timeframe
  • A false breakout/manipulation
  • Order-flow confirmation via Fair Value Gaps (FVGs) on lower timeframe(s)

Then trade direction-specific (example given):

  • Go long
  • Stop loss: at the low (specifically aligned to the 4-hour manipulation minimum)
  • Take profit: tuned to funding rules/account size

Timeframe alignment

  • Emphasizes pairing:
    • HTF candle: 4-hour
    • LTF execution / PO3: 1-minute
  • Also uses:
    • 15-minute FVG to locate the “nearest void” / liquidity point
    • Optionally 5-minute / 1-hour / 1-minute if 15-minute gaps are unavailable

Checklist / step-by-step procedure (as given)

  1. Indicators setup
    • Use an indicator for “HTF power 3” (stated as free, “not my indicator”)
    • Configure it to show the 4-hour timeframe alongside execution charts
  2. Time gating
    • Mark/operate starting at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time
    • Reason: 30 minutes after market opens, coinciding with a new 4-hour candle open
  3. Identify accumulation
    • Confirm price is moving laterally/ranging when the new 4H candle opens
    • Speaker marks accumulation with a green box
  4. Find the closest 15-minute FVG
    • Locate the nearest 15-minute “void” (liquidity zone)
    • Manipulation narrative requirement: justify why price would reverse at that liquidity point
    • If no 15m void exists / “fuse” is wrong, drop to 5m, occasionally 1h/1m
  5. Lower-timeframe “touch + alignment”
    • Price must touch the 15-minute gap
    • It must also form the low of the new 4-hour candle
    • If too high and it does not establish the 4H low: becomes “only one trade per pattern”
  6. Order flow confirmation using FVGs
    • Look for:
      • Bearish side ignored (for longs)
      • A new bullish 1-minute FVG respected after price hits the 15m void
    • Entry avoidance rule:
      • Don’t enter just because the chart “turns green”
      • Require the 1-minute gap to be respected (price should not close below it)
  7. Risk management (SL/TP)
    • Stop loss: at the 4-hour manipulation minimum (or aligned to the 4H low)
    • Take profit: optimized based on funding account balance and firm rules
    • Risk-reward targets stated:
      • Generally between 1:1 and 1:2
  8. Extra example rule
    • Wait until a 1-minute FVG is respected; otherwise skip the setup even if the 15-minute gap was hit.

Risk/position sizing and “funded account” payoff math

The speaker provides a statistical/risk-reward framework tied to funding payouts.

Success rate requirement depends on risk-reward

Examples from the “cheat sheet”:

  • 1:4 R:R → needs >20% success rate
  • 1:5 R:R → could lose 80% of trades and still be profitable (per speaker)
  • 1:1 R:R → requires a much higher success rate

Aim: maximize payout while managing risk dynamically

  • Funding company approach:
    • “Reach the maximum balance to be able to request a payment”
  • Example numbers:
    • Earn $3,400 if payout target is $4,000
    • Then only $150 more days are needed to reach target

Dynamic R:R reduction (in winning streak / margin buildup)

  • When margin is built up (example: “like $8,000 of margin”):
    • Speaker reduces R:R to increase probability of the next winning day
    • Claims “negative risk-benefit ratio” can occur to target $150 winning days
  • Stated negative/low R:R values:
    • Can be as negative as 0.5
    • Often between half an R and 1R
    • Sometimes as low as 0.3 (rare)

Account management

  • Doesn’t “copy operations everywhere”
  • “Consolidate accounts” and treats funding accounts like a diversified portfolio (analogy: don’t put all money into one low-cost stock)

Instruments / tickers / markets referenced

  • Tickers/asset symbols: none mentioned in the subtitles
  • Instruments: implied trading charts (likely FX/crypto/indices/CFDs), but not specified
  • Funding firms referenced:
    • Apex
    • Blue Sky
    • Lucid

Explicit recommendations / cautions

  • Entry caution: do not enter solely when candles “turn green” after hitting FVG; require 1-minute FVG respect (no bearish close through the gap)
  • Time-based execution: focus around 10:00 a.m. ET due to 4-hour candle open timing
  • Alignment caution: the 15m void must form the 4H candle low; otherwise setup quality/rules change

Disclosures

  • No explicit “not financial advice” or regulatory disclaimer was included in the provided subtitles.

Presenters / sources mentioned

  • Jack (speaker; referenced as “Okay, Jack…”)
  • Alan (mentoring student used as a payment-history example)
  • Funding firms referenced as payment sources: Apex, Blue Sky, Lucid

Rate this summary

Your feedback will help improve summaries.

Improve this summary

Reprocess with a stronger model when the summary feels incomplete or inaccurate.

Pro

Translate summary in another language

Pro

Ask questions to this video

Chat for follow-up questions, clarifications, and source-backed answers.

Coming soon

Share this summary

Original video