₹ 53 Ardee Recycling Company IPO: Apply or Avoid?

Finance-focused summary (IPO review: “Money Pass”)

• The channel reviews the IPO of RD Industries (a battery recycling company) and discusses key positives and negatives around the listing.
• Coverage includes: the business model, client concentration risks, margin/growth claims, valuation versus peers, and a warning that IPO figures may be “squeezed,” with potential post-listing correction risk.

---

Company / business model & key operating claims

• Business: Recycle old batteries to extract lead and also recover plastic.
• Purity claim: Extracted lead purity cited around 98%–99.98%.
• Revenue driver: Extracted lead is sold to battery makers.
  • Major buyer mentioned as linked to the Amarraja Group (Amarraja lead battery business referenced).
• Location: Single-factory operations in Tirupati.
• Installed capacity: 156,950 metric tons.
• Lead sale channels: Sold via commodity trading platforms:
  • MCX
  • London Exchange
• Process/technology: Uses a traditional furnace oil method (subtitle wording mentions “latest oxygen”).

---

Client concentration & revenue mix (explicit risk)

• Historical concentration: Previously up to ~70% of revenues from Amarraja (with a claim that concentration was reducing via new clients).
• Current concentration risk:
  • Largest client (Amarraja) contributes ~40% of revenues
  • Top 10 clients = ~91% of revenues
• Customer repetition:
  • 50 clients total
  • 36 repeat clients
• Explicit risk warning:
  • If the largest client reduces/stops procurement, it could be a “very big risk.”

---

Revenue, geography, and international exposure (numbers)

Revenue split

• India: 55.47% of revenue
• International: 39.83% of revenue

Export mix highlights

• Singapore: 42.48% of export revenue
• Switzerland: 40.49%–49%
  • (Subtitle ranges/wording appears inconsistent.)

Import dependence / raw-material sourcing

• Inputs/batteries sourced from 58 countries.
• Import country shares cited:
  • India: 13.06%
  • UAE: 25.23%
  • Singapore: 16.53%
  • US: 11.47%
  • Kuwait: 5.09%
  • Malaysia: 3.15%
  • (Subtitle repeats “5% from India” later—likely an artifact.)
• Takeaway: The business is import-dependent for raw materials/scrap supply, creating supply/geopolitical/cost risks.

---

Promoter group structure & IPO-related caution

• A promoter-linked unlisted company Pilot Industries is said to be in the same line of business.
• Management/disclosure claim: Plan to merge Pilot Industries into RD Industries after listing (merger ratios to be considered).
• Key caution logic:
  • If the listed entity benefits more from the merger → may be positive for stock.
  • If the unlisted entity benefits more → existing shareholders could lose value.
• Recommendation: Track merger-related developments closely.

---

Management / people mentioned

• Sandeep Agarwal: Chairman & MD
• Arun Kumar: CFO
• Ashish Kacholia: Mentioned (subtitle suggests his firm participated / appears in the anchor list)

---

IPO details & subscription math (explicit numbers)

• Issue size: ₹426 crore total
  • Fresh issue: ₹320 crore
  • OFS (offer for sale): ₹106 crore
• Face value: ₹2
• Price band: ₹50 to ₹53
• Valuation (described at upper band): about ₹1,670 crore
• Minimum participation mentioned: Apply for 281 shares (subtitle wording suggests a “multiple” condition)
• Allotment priority / quota (bucket labels partially unclear):
  • 50% to HNI? (subtitle shows “quota of 50% for S” — exact label unclear due to subtitle errors)
  • 15% to retail
  • 35% to government

Note: Some subtitle phrasing appears garbled (e.g., “Cuba…” and bucket label text). Retail and government buckets are clearly stated.

---

Financial snapshot & growth/margin claims (numbers)

Balance sheet / leverage

• Debt: ₹182 crore
• Equity: ₹147 crore
• Debt-equity: 1.2x
• Planned use of IPO proceeds: clear ₹20 crore debt using IPO funds
• Remaining debt: working-capital debt identified as the “most” among remaining debt.

Growth / profitability claims (as stated)

• Revenue growth (last 3 years): 58.81% / “or 81% growth” (subtitle inconsistent)
• Operating EBITDA growth: ~128% YoY (expected)
• Operating margins: improved from 6% → 12%
  • Stated improvement: +654 bps
• PAT growth: ~207% scissor growth (implies very strong YoY rise)
• “Even-Pot margin”: 1.93% → 7.25%
  • Subtitle suggests “or 25%,” but it’s unclear.

---

IPO “squeezed numbers” risk & valuation risk framing (explicit caution)

• Presenter cautions IPO financials may appear unusually strong because:
  • Pre-IPO “squeezed” margins can reverse after listing.
  • Even if initial performance looks good, negative surprises can lead to sharp stock corrections.
• Valuation caution:
  • If post-listing margins revert downward, PE may look expensive → risk of correction.

---

Peer comparison & valuation multiples (numbers)

• Peers referenced in subtitle include: Gravita, Pandi Oxide, and Zain Resources (names partially garbled).
• Margin sustainability question:
  • Peer context: existing player Pandi Oxide cited around ~7% margin
  • IPO company claimed ~12.6% margin
  • Doubt raised: whether 12.6% is sustainable.
• Valuation cited:
  • IPO quoted valuation: 15.96x P/E (presenter phrasing)
  • Listed peers reportedly trading at roughly double that valuation (per presenter)
• Performance/return ratios mentioned: “57%” and “44.26%” (metric unclear due to subtitle errors)
• Core idea: Sustained outperformance may support a re-rating; otherwise, valuation risk remains.

---

Explicit instruments / markets mentioned

• MCX (platform for lead sale)
• London Exchange (platform for lead sale)

---

Disclosures / disclaimers

• No explicit “not financial advice” disclaimer appears in the provided subtitle text.

---

Presenters / sources (as mentioned)

• Presenter: Sai Krishna Patri (stated at the end)
• Company referenced: RD Industries (battery recycling) via IPO context
• Investor mentioned: Ashish Kacholia (anchor participation implied)
• Peer companies mentioned: Gravita, Pandi Oxide, Zain Resources (per subtitle)