Video summary
Explaining the Cost of Quality, the 4 Cost Categories and Juran’s Quality Cost Curve
Main summary
Key takeaways
Main ideas / lessons conveyed
- The “cost of quality” is the total cost associated with achieving quality (both doing it right and failing to do it right).
-
A framework (credited to Armand V. Feigenbaum, based on his 1956 Harvard Business Review work) divides costs into four categories:
- Prevention and Appraisal → Cost of Good Quality
- Internal Failures and External Failures → Cost of Poor Quality
-
Most business activities can be classified into one of these four buckets using a key question:
- If you built a 100% conforming product, would that cost still exist?
- If yes, it’s typically cost of good quality (prevention/appraisal).
- If no (it arises from nonconformance), it’s cost of poor quality (internal/external failures).
- If you built a 100% conforming product, would that cost still exist?
-
The speaker emphasizes a bias toward prevention over inspection:
- Prevention focuses on ensuring quality happens upstream, rather than relying on detection at the end.
Methodology / instructions
How to categorize a cost/activity into the four buckets (Feigenbaum-style logic)
- Ask yourself:
- If we built a 100% conforming product, would this cost still be there?
- Interpret the answer:
- If the cost would still be required at 100% conformance
- classify as Good Quality cost
- specifically Prevention or Appraisal depending on the activity type
- If the cost occurs because nonconforming product was produced
- classify as Poor Quality cost
- it will fall into:
- Internal failures if detected before shipment
- External failures if detected after shipment
- If the cost would still be required at 100% conformance
Decision principle: prevention vs. appraisal
- When deciding between preventing issues vs. detecting them:
- Prefer prevention—aim to prevent nonconformance rather than “inspect quality in.”
The four cost categories (with examples of activities)
1) Prevention cost (cost of good quality)
Definition: Activities/costs designed to prevent poor quality / nonconformance from occurring.
Examples mentioned:
- Design / engineering
- Market research and voice of the customer
- Design inputs
- Robust design / Design for Six Sigma
- Risk management tools such as fault tree analysis and DFMEA
- Design prototype testing
- Design outputs
- Design reviews
- Design V&V (verification & validation)
- Process validation
- Equipment fixture / defect-proofing
- Vendor / supplier prevention
- Supplier quality approaches
- Supplier evaluation and capability assessment
- Supplier qualification
- Supplier scorecards, supplier ratings
- Supplier quality agreements
- Production / operations prevention
- New employee screening and training
- Controlled storage of raw material
- Quality planning activities
- Quality system audits
- Writing procedures
- Predictive equipment maintenance
- Continuing education
- Quality system data activities
- Quality improvement projects
2) Appraisal cost (cost of good quality)
Definition: Activities/costs designed to measure, inspect, evaluate, or audit to ensure products meet requirements.
Examples mentioned:
- Supplier/appraisal
- Receiving inspection
- Source inspection
- Supplier audits
- Supplier surveys
- Operational/appraisal
- In-process testing (measurements, functional testing)
- Finished goods inspection
- Equipment setup/testing to confirm process parameters are validated
- Destructive testing
- Costs of measurement/inspection equipment (explicitly included)
- Laboratory testing
- Testing and measurement/inspection used to control the process
- Quality management/appraisal
- Product audits
- Control charts and SPC
- Review of inspection data
- Periodic review of documentation
- Maintenance and calibration of test equipment
- Process control and monitoring activities
3) Internal failure cost (cost of poor quality)
Definition: Costs from nonconformance detected before shipment to the customer.
Examples mentioned:
- Scrap and sorting
- Rework and reprocessing
- Reinspection
- Root cause investigation (including the idea that it consumes time/resources that could be used for improvement)
- Extra material handling (segregating nonconforming material into hold areas)
- Extra capacity needs (e.g., yield loss requiring additional capacity)
- Lost labor due to equipment downtime
- Excess inventory (described as a “hidden cost,” used to mitigate risk from downtime/yield loss)
- Scrap or rework due to design changes
- Employee turnover due to repeated unresolved issues
Underlying theme: Internal failures create waste and opportunity cost before products reach customers.
4) External failure cost (cost of poor quality)
Definition: Costs from nonconformance detected after shipment to the customer.
Examples mentioned:
- Warranty costs
- Repair costs
- Customer complaints
- Product liability and legal fees
- Overhead costs of field service teams
- Recalls and market actions
- Lost sales and lost customers
- Lost reputation and goodwill
Underlying theme: External failures are the most devastating and expensive because they imply prevention/appraisal didn’t catch problems beforehand.
Juran’s quality cost curve (conceptual model)
Axes and meaning
- Y-axis: Cost of quality activities
- X-axis: Quality level, from 0% conforming to 100% conforming
How the curve behaves
-
Cost of good quality (Prevention + Appraisal):
- Increases linearly as quality improves
- At 100% conformance, prevention/appraisal are at their “most expensive” (per the model)
-
Cost of poor quality (Internal + External failures):
- Is near zero at 100% conformance
- Increases exponentially as quality decreases
- Rationale given: more nonconforming product reaches customers over time, driving penalties and dissatisfaction
Conclusion from the model
- The lowest total cost of quality occurs at 100% conformance
- The key message: fewer defects → minimized total cost, even if prevention/appraisal costs are higher
Speakers / sources featured (identified in the subtitles)
- Andy Robertson (host/presenter; “Andy Robertson here with CQE Academy”)
- Armand V. Feigenbaum (credited with introducing the cost of quality idea; referenced via his 1956 Harvard Business Review paper)
-
Benjamin Franklin
“An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”
-
W. Edwards Deming
“Quality comes not from inspection, but from improvement of the process”